- Obama not worried about Ebola at upcoming African summit in D.C.
- Obama: ‘We tortured some folks’ after 9/11
- Obama administration asked whole D.C. Circuit to take on major Obamacare case
- Mark Levin: Topple GOP leadership or country will ‘unravel’
- Massachusetts to let police chief deny gun buys to those deemed unfit
- John Kerry condemns attack on Israeli soldiers, kidnapping
- U.S. starts to evacuate American Ebola patients from West Africa: Report
- Geraldo slammed as ‘dummy’ for backing Clinton’s bin Laden claim
- Israeli spokesman: No need to debate who broke the cease-fire
- 35 Palestinians killed; Israeli officer missing
TYRRELL: Throw the book at Snowden
Shocking folks is one thing; endangering them is quite another
Question of the Day
I depart America for two blissful weeks in Italy and return to find that my country has been transformed, rather rudely, into a totalitarian state on the order of Iran, possibly even North Korea. My telephone is directly plugged into something called "Prism." Big Brother hounds my email even when I am only viewing the weather.
Soon, I shall be wearing a Mao jacket — or perhaps not. Possibly, my fears are overheated. Yet, President Obama got us into this mess, and it is unlikely that he will get us out. He seems smugly unconcerned about the fears of almost 50 percent of the American people who, I adjudge, are almost as worried as I am.
Consider recent news stories that have nothing to do with "Prism," the National Security Agency or my fears. Consider the claim that the Internal Revenue Service has been molesting people of faith, members of the conservative movement, and stalwarts of the Tea Party movement. Consider that the Justice Department has been subpoenaing journalists' work. Countless news stories on these matters have made many Americans a little edgy. Then came this thunderbolt. Some dimwit associated with the NSA project or the CIA has leaked to the Guardian and to the Washington Post evidence that the government of the United States has been eavesdropping on the Internet communications and the telephone calls of all Americans and especially of foreigners for evidence of terrorist plots.
Mr. Obama could not have orchestrated an outbreak of paranoia on a national scale any more effectively. First, came the stories about the IRS and the subpoenaing of journalists. Then came this NSA story. Barack, you have only yourself to blame on this one, not George W.; not even Richard Nixon. This wave of suspicion that has swept the country was achieved only by you and your maladroit administration, assisted by a thousand or so loyal facilitators in the relevant government departments and agencies.
Fortunately, before I gave up my citizenship and returned to Italy, I picked up the indispensable Wall Street Journal, and there on the op-ed page was an illuminating essay by one of my favorite civil libertarians, Michael Mukasey, Eric H. Holder Jr.'s predecessor as U.S. attorney general as well as a former U.S. district judge for the Southern District of New York. Mr. Mukasey has reassured me that the NSA's actions have merit, though they could still go too far. Since the ghastly attack of Sept. 11, 2001, there are real threats to our freedoms and our safety. Government has thwarted further attacks and has led to the arrest of others, for instance, Najibullah Zazi, the would-be New York City subway bomber.
The government eavesdropping is conducted according to the law. Nothing that has been done thus far is illegal. The rights of the citizenry have been protected. "Given the nature of the data being collected," writes Mr. Mukasey, "and the relatively small number and awful responsibility of those who do the collecting, the claims of pervasive spying, even if sincere, appear not merely exaggerated, but downright irrational." Well, I part company with Mr. Mukasey here. Given the nature of the IRS scandal and of the Justice Department's hassling of journalists, there are grounds for our suspicion.
Yet Mr. Mukasey is convincing, though I wish he had taken up the question of the dimwit who was the Guardian's and the Post's source. His name is Edward J. Snowden, and today he is trying to pass himself off as a modern-day Daniel Ellsberg. I say of him as I said years ago of Mr. Ellsberg: Throw the book at him. He has endangered the security of the country.
R. Emmett Tyrrell Jr. is founder and editor in chief of the American Spectator and an adjunct scholar at the Hudson Institute.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
TWT Video Picks
By Orrin G. Hatch
Procedural changes impede the chamber's traditional deliberative function
Get Breaking Alerts
- Border agents cleared of civil rights complaints from illegal immigrant children
- U.N. condemns Israel, U.S. for not sharing Iron Dome with Hamas
- Obama military strategy too weak for future security, panel reports
- Porn-surfing feds blame boredom, lack of work for misbehavior
- Ben Carson takes major step toward presidential campaign
- Feds raid S.C. home to seize Land Rover in EPA emission-control crackdown
- Ted Nugent slams 'lying freaks' at liberal media: I'm 'doing God's work'
- CRUZ: A tale of two hospitals: One in Israel, one in Gaza
- Report: 40% of weapons sent to Afghanistan are unaccounted for
- House backs faster deportations, cancels 'Dreamer' policy