- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
- Rep. Henry Cuellar on border crisis: ‘Playing defense on the one-yard line’
- Activists vow to occupy fast-food restaurants to get higher pay
- Rep. Luis Gutierrez: Senate Dems wary of immigration politics
- Summer camp for 1 percenters: Sushi, limos and shopping at FAO Schwarz
- Colorado gun crackdown law found to be built on faulty data
- Hank Aaron steps to fundraising plate for Democrat Michelle Nunn
- ISIL terrorists blow up burial site of Jonah, vow more of same
- Impeach Obama, say 35 percent in new poll
- Taliban yank 14 Shiites off bus, bind and shoot them on Afghan road
Panel sticks with Gehry’s memorial to Ike
Eisenhower family sought new design
Question of the Day
The commission handling the design and construction of the Dwight D. Eisenhower Memorial on Wednesday largely ignored recent criticism of the memorial design, choosing instead to unanimously approve the plan despite concerns over cost and concept.
Speaking before a Russell Senate Office Building room crowded with supporters and design samples, memorial commission chairman Rocco Siciliano defended his board’s actions as well as the design of renowned contemporary architect Frank Gehry.
“No intent was made here to railroad or walk over outside opinions, especially the family’s,” Mr. Siciliano said, referencing the mounting criticism from Eisenhower’s relatives and the House committee tasked with overseeing the memorial. “The family deserves to be heard. The family does not deserve to be obeyed.”
Mr. Gehry unveiled modest design changes to the memorial, including a bas relief — a type of sculpture that is built into a wall of stone — along with freestanding figures on one block of the memorial. He also changed the statue of a childlike Eisenhower to a teenage version sitting casually along the memorial’s edge, looking out to his future accomplishments depicted in the park.
“It’s still very similar to the competition model in principle,” Mr. Gehry said.
Since it was approved by President Clinton in 1999, the proposed Eisenhower memorial has invited both critique and commendations.
During Wednesday’s hearing, Rep. Michael K. Simpson, Idaho Republican, read a letter from Susan and Anne Eisenhower, granddaughters of the World War II general and 34th president, which stated that the family “will not support the current Gehry design” and urged a new design competition.
The concern, Mr. Simpson related, was that mounting disagreement on the final design could stall the memorial and even derail it.
Sen. Pat Roberts, Kansas Republican, responded that while not everyone could agree on the design, “I also know we have to move forward.”
“I’m sorry we haven’t been able to accommodate a difference of opinions,” Mr. Roberts said. “Sometimes you can work things out, sometimes you can’t.”
Last week, the House Committee on Natural Resources, which is overseeing the memorial, approved legislation that would term-limit commission members to four years and offer a chance for new people to serve on the commission or for former members to serve again if they are chosen.
The memorial honoring the 34th president is planned for a 4-acre plot of land between the National Air and Space Museum and the U.S. Department of Education in Southwest. The design features a park area and stone panels engraved with portraits from Eisenhower’s military and political careers set off by 80-foot columns supporting woven metal tapestries depicting scenes from his Kansas upbringing.
Mr. Gehry explained that the design was meant to capture the arc of Eisenhower’s life, from his humble beginnings in Abilene, Kan. Eisenhower graduated from West Point and served in World War I before becoming the commander of the Allied Expeditionary Forces during World War II. He was elected president of the United States and was in office from 1953 to 1961.
More than $60 million has been appropriated for the memorial since it was approved by Mr. Clinton in 1999, and the Dwight D. Eisenhower Memorial Commission has requested an additional $51 million for construction costs for its fiscal 2014 budget.
Rep. Rob Bishop, Utah Republican who sits on the Natural Resources Committee and drafted the bill, said his committee found “some very significant flaws” with the memorial commission’s process, notably the way in which the architect and design were chosen.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Meredith Somers is a Metro reporter for The Washington Times. She can be reached at email@example.com.
- Higher Ground: War no deterrent
- Marco Rubio: U.S. at social, moral crossroads
- Humanists hit the Hill to press for 'nontheistic' chaplains
- Humanist services lacking in the military, advocates tell Congress
- Humanists seek support from Congress on military chaplains
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- Presidents of Honduras, Guatemala blame U.S. for border children crisis
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- PRUDEN: The Democratic-wannabe mice under Hillary Clinton's feet
- Obama takes aim at 'corporate deserters'
- Crime-ridden U.S. cities differ on ways to fight gun violence
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq