- House passes VA reform compromise
- Obama admin to blame for HealthCare.gov woes, $840M cost: GAO
- Al Gore’s climate-changers at EPA hearings foiled by cool temperatures
- Army’s 3-D printed bombs will create ‘a whole new universe’ of deadly capabilities
- Hamas calls on Hezbollah to join in fight against Israel
- Senators to FIFA, others: Don’t reward Putin with the World Cup in 2018
- U.S. condemns Israeli shelling of shelter in Gaza
- Obamacare shoots premiums up by 88 percent in California
- Chicken pox outbreak puts illegal immigrant facility on lockdown
- Obama to Republicans: ‘Stop just hatin’ all the time’
Parents plea with FCC to keep TV’s decency rules
Question of the Day
Thousands of people — often describing themselves as parents and grandparents — passionately urged the FCC not to change policy and allow "fleeting" or "isolated" instances of nudity and cursing on public airwaves.
More than 101,000 comments were filed just hours before the Wednesday evening deadline to the Federal Communications Commission on its possible policy change for programming airing before 10 p.m.
Just how much impact these comments will have on the agency's final decision remains unclear.
"It is the voice of the American people," said Tim Winter, president of the Parents Television Council, which tracks indecency in the media. "Is the public-comment period important? Or is the industry's voice more important? We'll see."
The FCC is not compelled to do anything in its decency enforcement. Several of its enforcement decisions were thrown out in a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court ruling.
In April, the agency asked for comment on a proposal to penalize radio and television broadcast companies for egregious instances of obscenity, but not "isolated" ones. The change presumably would accommodate occasions where people curse during live broadcasts or when there is a "wardrobe malfunction," as happened to singer Janet Jackson during the 2004 Super Bowl.
"Don't allow trashier trash to be aired. Please," wrote a Utah woman.
"Please set a higher [decency] standard. We have compromised far too much already," said a woman from Fairfax.
Traditional-values groups also weighed in, asking the FCC to keep its current standard and penalize both isolated and egregious instances of obscenity.
Networks have pledged to act in the public interest and they "have a moral duty to the American public to responsibly provide content that is acceptable for all viewers," said Concerned Women for America.
If obscenity is OK if it's isolated, "my concern is that ... every show in prime time will likely have some incident of profanity or indecency, like nudity. And the networks will be jumping over each other to top each other," said Patrick Trueman, president and chief executive of Morality in Media. "The language they are proposing is ambiguous and ambivalent.
Ted Baehr, chairman of the Christian Film and Television Commission, said the proposed language is too ambiguous and "doesn't help the situation at all."
However, industry representatives said current decency rules are confused relics of a bygone era.
The National Association of Broadcasters did refer to the "regulatory vagueness," but recommended the FCC clearly state that it "will no longer treat fleeting or isolated expletives and images as actionably indecent."
Others see it as just a waiting game.
"We believe that it is simply a matter of time before the Supreme Court strikes down indecency regulation once and for all," wrote TechFreedom, Public Knowledge, Electronic Frontier Foundation, and the Center for Democracy & Technology.
"Broadcasters take seriously their obligations as stewards of the public airwaves," said the network affiliates' association for CBS and NBC. Imposing costly fines for fleeting expletives or brief nudity "would unnecessarily chill speech, discourage broadcasters from airing live events and deprive the public of valuable programming."
At a minimum, the FCC should "exempt news and public-affairs programming from indecency regulation," said the Radio Television Digital News Association.
If the public is offended by sights and sounds in such programming, there are any number of means for it to "voice its discontent," such as "hitting the 'off' button, turning the dial, or changing the channel," the association added.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Cheryl Wetzstein covers family and social issues as a national reporter for The Washington Times. She has been a reporter for three decades, working in New York City and Washington, D.C. Since joining The Washington Times in 1985, she has been a features writer, environmental and consumer affairs reporter, and assistant business editor.
Beginning in 1994, Mrs. Wetzstein worked exclusively ...
- Mississippi abortion law can't be enforced
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia's gay marriage ban
- Events honoring 20th National Parents' Day reaffirm family
- '50 Shades' movie trailer outrages anti-porn groups
- Tougher clinic rules lead to drop in Texas abortions
Latest Blog Entries
- Gay therapy ban author seeks Calif. House seat
- Transgender 'bathroom law' gets 5,000 more signatures
- Pro-life, stem-cell bill signed into law by Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback
- N. Dakota lawmakers approve tough abortion bill
- Pope Benedict XVI's successor should allow priests to get a new title: Husband, poll finds
TWT Video Picks
- Geraldo Rivera: Matt Drudge 'doing his best to stir up a civil war'
- Al Gore's climate-changers at EPA hearings foiled by cool temperatures
- Catholic League slams Obama: 'Do Christian lives mean so little to you?'
- Lois Lerner hated conservatives, new emails show
- HURT: Impeaching Obama is a losing strategy for the GOP
- House unveils bill to speed deportations of illegal immigrant children
- Obama thanks Muslims for 'building the very fabric of our nation'
- CARSON: Rudderless U.S. foreign policy
- Federal judge grants 90-day stay in D.C. gun case
- 'Big Bang' star Mayim Bialik helps send bulletproof vests to IDF
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world