- Mandela service sign language interpreter: ‘He made up his own signs’
- Pope Francis named Time’s ‘Person of the Year’
- Ben Affleck: Fundraising for Democrats started to ‘feel gross’
- Vladimir Putin orders military to boost presence in Arctic
- Brooklyn, N.Y.: ‘Lesbian capital’ of the Northeast
- Elian Gonzalez: It’s America’s fault that my mother died
- India top court rules homosexuality is illegal
- Aaron Hernandez, ex-Patriot, on prison life: ‘I’m way less stressed in jail’
- Man pulled from water believed to be disgraced D.C. cop
- Kabul airport hit by suicide bomber who targeted NATO gate
Democrats say they didn’t concede on immigration bill
Democrats who wrote the immigration bill insisted they didn't give up any core principles in agreeing to more fencing and adding 20,000 Border Patrol agents to the southwest border, telling Univision that illegal immigrants will still get legal status well before the new security kicks in.
In an interview on the Spanish-language network's Al Punto political talk show Sunday, the four Democrats among the "Gang of Eight" that crafted the bill said the people currently in the U.S. illegally will have a definite pathway to eventual citizenship because the "triggers" in the bill can all be readily met.
"There are triggers but they're the same triggers we've had in the bill before, the same exact type which are specific and attainable. These are triggers that we all feel comfortable with will be achieved and have to be achieved," said Sen. Charles E. Schumer, New York Democrat.
The four Democrats have faced criticism from immigrant-rights groups who said the lawmakers conceded too much to Republicans in a search for votes.
One Maryland group derided the new security provisions as a "backroom deal" while Pablo Alvarado, director of the National Day Laborer Organizing Network, said Democrats were wasting their election mandate and caving to "xenophobes" in the GOP.
"It is time for senators and the president to take a stand and to start defending immigrants and our cherished national values, rather than pre-emptively conceding to nativists," he said.
Late last week the four agreed to the boost in fencing and Border Patrol agents as a way of bringing about a half-dozen more Republicans onboard, and said they hope to sway others when the time comes for a final vote.
"It's a significant commitment and it really says to our friends on the Republican side who have insisted on this, this is how serious we are," said Sen. Richard J. Durbin, Illinois Democrat. "We're willing to put that massive number on the border, even though some of us may question it, to show our commitment and good faith to border security."
The senators disputed part of the new Congressional Budget Office report saying that 75 percent of illegal immigration will continue even after the bill is passed. The CBO said much of that will come from people who enter as guest workers or on other temporary visas and refuse to go home when their time is up.
But the senators did tout the CBO's finding that the legislation will reduce federal deficits by adding more taxpaying workers to the labor force.
The senators defended some of the compromises they had to make, including setting a cutoff date for legalization to apply to those who came before 2012.
Mr. Schumer raised the possibility of revisiting that in the future, particularly to legalize children who may have arrived after the Dec. 31, 2011, deadline.
"My hope is, you know, that we look at that in future years," Mr. Schumer told host Jorge Ramos, "but right now, no, and we would not advise people to come now in hopes that they would be legalized because that's not going to happen."
Mr. Schumer also had harsh words for fellow Sen. Ted Cruz, a Texas Republican and son of a Cuban immigrant, who has called the Senate bill an amnesty because it grants legal status in the short term and doesn't require results.
"All I can tell you is when he argues, he is so filled with anger and he doesn't look at the facts," Mr. Schumer, the bill's chief author, said. "Here's what I'd like to ask Sen. Cruz. Isn't the real reason that you object to our bill is you are against the path to citizenship? Why don't you just come out and say that?"
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Stephen Dinan can be reached at email@example.com.
- Federal deficit shrinks 20 percent in fiscal 2014
- Wind farms: Interior Department sacrifices eagle protection for alternative energy
- Activists urge Obama to go rogue, sidestep Congress
- Bipartisan House votes against 'patent trolls' who file lawsuits against innovators
- Bipartisan House votes to stop patent 'trolls'
Latest Blog Entries
By Donald Lambro
Growth spikes are little more than trend-free anomalies
- Teen thugs in DC run wild -- even while wearing GPS ankle bracelets
- New budget accord saves $23 billion -- after $65 billion spending spree
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
- VEGAS RULES: Harry Reid pushed feds to change ruling for casino's big-money foreigners
- CARSON: Why did the founders give us the Second Amendment?
- Gov't Motors: Obama fudges math on auto bailout, $15 billion loss for taxpayers
- Somber duty: U.S. presidents in hot demand at Mandela's memorial
- FITTON: A closer look at the Benghazi lie
- American bourbon now better than Scottish whiskey: U.K.-born expert
- LAMBRO: The dark lining to the silver cloud of Obamanomics
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Helping the YOUniverse conspire on your behalf.
A column dedicated to discussing politics, national security, civil liberties, and education.
Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things.
The “Silver Tsunami” created by aging Baby Boomers is hitting America. Let’s explore how we adjust to it, enjoy it and defy negative expectations about age.
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow