- Egypt rights center raided, 2 Mubaraks acquitted
- New Mexico Supreme Court rules same-sex marriage constitutional
- Blame Bush: 5 years later, that’s still the mantra, pollsters find
- Dutch prostitutes demand same retirement benefits as soccer stars
- John McCain to Harry Reid: I’ll ‘kick the crap’ out of you
- Dogs that talk: Researchers seek $10K for ‘No More Woof’ technology
- 1,000 firefighters called to battle stubborn Big Sur wildfire
- Black Friday brouhaha: Millions of Target shoppers hit by credit card theft
- Britain orders airplane to rescue citizens from violent South Sudan
- Mega Millions winner emerges as Georgia mom, in ‘disbelief’
Army lays out plans to remove 80,000 soldiers; base communities brace for impacts
Question of the Day
The Army announced a massive restructuring of its force Tuesday, slashing 12 combat brigades and affecting military communities from Georgia to Washington state, as it prepares to cut 80,000 active-duty soldiers from its ranks over the next four years.
Ten of those brigades are within the United States, and two are stationed in Germany. An additional brigade will be cut, although Army officials said they have not decided which one. Brigades are usually about 3,500 troops each, but they can run as high as 5,000 soldiers.
The move will reduce the number of brigades from 45 to 33 and cut about 17,300 active-duty personnel in the United States and roughly 11,700 from Germany. Thousands of other jobs across the service in units that support the brigades also will be cut. Most soldiers in deactivated brigades will be transferred to other units.
Members of Congress whose districts will feel the impact from the reductions expressed disappointment.
Rep. Adam Smith, Washington Democrat and a member of the House Armed Services Committee, said the cuts to Joint Base Lewis-McChord will result in a loss of 4,500 soldiers. He called the Army’s decision a “major loss to the Puget Sound community.” He also blamed the House Republican majority for refusing to stop mandatory budget cuts, called sequestration, that will slash the military budget by nearly $500 billion over the next decade.
Rep. Doug Lamborn, Colorado Republican and also an Armed Services Committee member, said he is “very disappointed” that Fort Carson in his district is on the Army’s list. But he added that the impact will be “considerably softened” because only 750 soldiers will be affected in a reduction of the brigade stationed there.
“We will carefully examine the implications of this initial restructuring, but we all must understand that this is only the tip of the iceberg. Much deeper cuts are still to come,” he said.
“I know in the local communities it will have its impact,” he said. “But we’ve done our best to reach out to them so they understand what the impacts are. We’ve tried to make it as small an impact as possible for as many communities as we could.”
He said the Army is “undergoing one of the largest organizational changes probably since World War II.”
Before selecting the bases for troop reductions, Army officials conducted 6,500 hours of simulated combat in 34 scenarios. Officials interviewed commanders, assessed environmental and socio-economic impact and met with soldiers, their families and local leaders, Gen. Odierno said.
In addition to the bases in Colorado and Washington state, brigades will be cut at Fort Bliss and Fort Hood in Texas, Fort Bragg in North Carolina, Fort Drum in New York, Fort Campbell and Fort Knox in Kentucky, Fort Riley in Kansas and Fort Stewart in Georgia.
“We’ve spread it out quite good. And one of the reasons we did that was first, it allows us to have diversity across the United States and the way we took the brigades out limits the amount of impact,” Gen. Odierno said.
About $400 million in military construction projects also will be canceled, Gen. Odierno said.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Kristina Wong is a national security reporter for The Washington Times, covering defense, foreign policy and intelligence affairs. She can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Despite Pentagon cuts and eye on Pacific, Air Force implored to save the 'Warthog'
- Pentagon welcomes budget deal but says more defense spending needed
- Rep. Hunter to Pentagon: Don't lower combat standards for women
- Scientists raise alarm over plan to destroy Syria's chemical weapons at sea
- Hagel renews Qatar defense pact despite differences over Iran, Syria
By Andrew P. Napolitano
Fourth Amendment says Obama is not at liberty to collect metadata
- Calling prison term disparities unfair, Obama commutes sentences for 8 crack offenders
- Homeland Security helps smuggle illegal immigrant children into the U.S.
- Gov't wasted $30 billion on 'pillownauts,' crystal goblets -- buying human urine!
- Armed response, not restrictive gun laws, brought swift end to school shooting
- Bill Gates: The Secret Santa disguised as a 'friendly fellow' on Reddit
- Obamacare 'pajamas boy' gets roundly mocked
- Duck Dynasty Phil Robertson suspended indefinitely for gay quip
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- U.S. Army mulls wiping out memory of Robert E. Lee, 'Stonewall' Jackson
- BOLTON: Nero in the White House
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow