- Anthony Weiner on his current sexting habits: ‘None of your business’
- Producers eye Capitol Hill for latest reality TV hit
- No selfie awareness: Obama, Biden mug for Instagram as Ukraine implodes
- Putin to Snowden: We don’t collect droves of data on everyone like the U.S.
- Clemson football’s new opponent: Atheists upset with player prayer, Bible study
- Toronto Mayor Rob Ford’s re-election launch party will be ‘history in the making,’ brother says
- Louisiana group hits back at Sen. Mary Landrieu campaign ad with ‘Actress Mary’ spot
- Brain surgery victim struggles with Obamacare: ‘It’s scary’
- Pro-Russian forces storm Ukrainian national guard base; 3 killed
- Joe Biden’s first Instagram pic mocked as shill for sunglass ad
FEULNER: No reason for a victory lap over the debt
Entitlements are still racing toward a crash
“After two years of harrowing confrontations in Washington,” begins a recent article in the Washington Post, “the national debt is no longer growing out of control and policymakers from President Barack Obama to House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, have rushed to take credit.”
Credit? Considering how so much government spending is funded these days, that’s an ironic word to use.
To say that it’s way too early to take a victory lap on the national debt is an understatement. Sure, the deficit picture has improved somewhat because of the “fiscal cliff” tax hikes and cuts in discretionary spending under the Budget Control Act. But our government still carries a huge load of debt, and this latest improvement certainly won’t last. In fact, absent real reform, it’s set to get much worse.
How much worse? If no other changes are made, national debt will increase from $11 trillion in 2012 to $19 trillion in 2023. Debt subject to the legal limit — which includes money owed to federal trust funds such as Social Security’s — will swell by $9 trillion, reaching $25 trillion after a decade, notes budget analyst Alison Fraser.
When the debt rises like that, government has no choice but to pay more and more of our tax dollars just to cover the interest on it.
We throw around these terms so much, it’s easy to lose sight of how much $1 trillion is. That’s 12 zeroes. If you paid $1 a second, with no interest, it would take about 32,000 years to pay down just $1 trillion of our national debt. Yet the total amount is much, much higher than that — and primed to climb even more.
It’s easy to shrug off such giant numbers, but we shouldn’t. Such massive deficits have real-world consequences that can prove harmful. For now, the economy is enjoying low interest rates, but we can’t expect that to remain the case under a sharply increased national debt. Interest rates likely would spike, slowing the economy.
That means some families won’t be able to borrow money to get mortgages and car loans. It could place the dream of starting a business out of reach for many Americans.
That’s only the beginning. There are other ways that a soaring national debt can affect all of us adversely.
Personal income would suffer, for example. A study by the International Monetary Fund shows that the drag on the economy the debt creates could cause families to lose up to $11,000 every year.
Another danger as debt soars: higher inflation. The government, through the Federal Reserve, could to try to reduce the debt by creating more currency. But inflating the money supply can’t help but weaken economic growth.
Inflation has been low for so long that most Americans forget how costly it is to live in a high-inflation economy. A rapidly escalating debt could remind them quickly.
It also can mean bad news for Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security. These massive programs are the main reasons that debt is growing by leaps and bounds. Yet Congress still hasn’t taken the steps necessary to make these programs affordable and sustainable. Such a head-in-the-sand mentality can only jeopardize benefits for those who need them the most.
The level of spending increases is unsustainable. In 2012, the Treasury collected $2.4 trillion in taxes, more than $20,000 per household. Sounds like a lot, and it is. But it wasn’t enough. The federal government spent $3.5 trillion.
“Lord, the money we do spend on government,” Will Rogers once quipped. “And it’s not one bit better than the government we got for one-third the money 20 years ago.”
More than 80 years after he said that, the problem has only worsened. Too much drag makes it impossible for an airplane to fly. The same is true for economies. Lawmakers need to get serious about taming the debt, not take bows for fleeting improvements.
Ed Feulner is founder of the Heritage Foundation (heritage.org).
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
TWT Video Picks
By John R. Bolton
Reality calls for attaching Gaza to Egypt and the West Bank to Jordan
Get Breaking Alerts
- 'Culture of intimidation' seen in Nevada ranch standoff
- Removal of military gear limits options for U.S., NATO in Ukraine
- IRS emails reveal discussion with Justice about suing nonprofits for election activities
- Rand and Ron Paul ride to the rescue for Bundy in Nevada standoff with feds
- NAPOLITANO: Hope for the dead and freedom for the living
- CURL: The state of the Union worse than you thought
- PETA officials collide with deer
- CNN op-ed claims right-wingers 'more deadly than jihadists'
- BOLTON: A 'three-state solution' for Middle East peace
- U.S. Navy to turn seawater into jet fuel
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Bundy support demonstrates voters' distrust
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obamacare disasters were avoidable
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Muhammad wouldn't condone Boston bombing
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: High heels: Hazardous to one's health?
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Marshall's comments hurt GOP, pro-lifers