- Obama downplays IRS scandal, blames Obamacare rollout on ‘outdated’ agencies
- Pregnancies decline overall, up among older women
- Pentagon plans to destroy Syrian chemical arms on ship at sea
- Paris Metro issues ‘politeness manual’ to improve passengers’ behavior
- Justin Bieber, crew detained at Australian airport in drug search
- Lee Rigby trial: Muslim who machete-hacked soldier calls it ‘humane’ kill
- GM ending Chevy sales in Europe to focus on Opel and Vauxhall
- Putin’s diplomats to U.S. busted for living high life off $1.5M bilked from Medicaid
- Happy Meal: Couple goes to McDonald’s, leaves with bag packed with cash
- Boehner: It took me 3 to 4 hours to sign up for Obamacare
FEULNER: No reason for a victory lap over the debt
Entitlements are still racing toward a crash
“After two years of harrowing confrontations in Washington,” begins a recent article in the Washington Post, “the national debt is no longer growing out of control and policymakers from President Barack Obama to House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, have rushed to take credit.”
Credit? Considering how so much government spending is funded these days, that’s an ironic word to use.
To say that it’s way too early to take a victory lap on the national debt is an understatement. Sure, the deficit picture has improved somewhat because of the “fiscal cliff” tax hikes and cuts in discretionary spending under the Budget Control Act. But our government still carries a huge load of debt, and this latest improvement certainly won’t last. In fact, absent real reform, it’s set to get much worse.
How much worse? If no other changes are made, national debt will increase from $11 trillion in 2012 to $19 trillion in 2023. Debt subject to the legal limit — which includes money owed to federal trust funds such as Social Security’s — will swell by $9 trillion, reaching $25 trillion after a decade, notes budget analyst Alison Fraser.
When the debt rises like that, government has no choice but to pay more and more of our tax dollars just to cover the interest on it.
We throw around these terms so much, it’s easy to lose sight of how much $1 trillion is. That’s 12 zeroes. If you paid $1 a second, with no interest, it would take about 32,000 years to pay down just $1 trillion of our national debt. Yet the total amount is much, much higher than that — and primed to climb even more.
It’s easy to shrug off such giant numbers, but we shouldn’t. Such massive deficits have real-world consequences that can prove harmful. For now, the economy is enjoying low interest rates, but we can’t expect that to remain the case under a sharply increased national debt. Interest rates likely would spike, slowing the economy.
That means some families won’t be able to borrow money to get mortgages and car loans. It could place the dream of starting a business out of reach for many Americans.
That’s only the beginning. There are other ways that a soaring national debt can affect all of us adversely.
Personal income would suffer, for example. A study by the International Monetary Fund shows that the drag on the economy the debt creates could cause families to lose up to $11,000 every year.
Another danger as debt soars: higher inflation. The government, through the Federal Reserve, could to try to reduce the debt by creating more currency. But inflating the money supply can’t help but weaken economic growth.
Inflation has been low for so long that most Americans forget how costly it is to live in a high-inflation economy. A rapidly escalating debt could remind them quickly.
It also can mean bad news for Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security. These massive programs are the main reasons that debt is growing by leaps and bounds. Yet Congress still hasn’t taken the steps necessary to make these programs affordable and sustainable. Such a head-in-the-sand mentality can only jeopardize benefits for those who need them the most.
The level of spending increases is unsustainable. In 2012, the Treasury collected $2.4 trillion in taxes, more than $20,000 per household. Sounds like a lot, and it is. But it wasn’t enough. The federal government spent $3.5 trillion.
“Lord, the money we do spend on government,” Will Rogers once quipped. “And it’s not one bit better than the government we got for one-third the money 20 years ago.”
More than 80 years after he said that, the problem has only worsened. Too much drag makes it impossible for an airplane to fly. The same is true for economies. Lawmakers need to get serious about taming the debt, not take bows for fleeting improvements.
Ed Feulner is founder of the Heritage Foundation (heritage.org).
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Why such hatred toward America's freedom of religion?
Get Breaking Alerts
- 'Hunger Games' delivers Obama's message on income inequality: liberal group
- Activists urge Obama to go rogue, sidestep Congress
- PRUDEN: British press horrified as London's new mayor dares to proclaim the truth
- Hack attack: 2 million Facebook, Twitter passwords stolen
- Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.
- NAPOLITANO: Pope Francis should be saving souls, not pocketbooks
- Blast of winter weather heads to D.C. area
- GOP launches candidate training: How to talk to women
- Russian diplomats busted bilking $1.5 million from Medicaid
- CARSON: Getting to the top by starting at the bottom