- Survivors recall chaos, fear in Everest avalanche
- General Mills apologizes for ‘right to sue’ confusion, reverses policy
- Dealer wanted in U.S. for art fraud nabbed in Spain
- Easter morning delivery for space station
- Boxer Rubin ‘Hurricane’ Carter dies at 76
- Probe could complicate Rick Perry’s prospects
- Ukraine, Russia trade blame for eastern shootout
- Obamas head to church on Easter morning
- In Colorado, a pot holiday tries to go mainstream
- Ukraine PM vows to find ‘bastards’ behind anti-Semitic fliers
Flour power isn’t sweet on gay marriage; bakeries snub same-sex couples’ weddings
DENVER — Supporters of same-sex marriage are taking their fight to new venues daily — first to the courts, then to state legislatures, and now to bakeries.
The owner of a Colorado bakery who refused to bake a wedding cake for a gay couple is fighting a civil-rights complaint filed May 31 by the attorney general's office. A hearing is scheduled for Sept. 23 before an administrative-law judge in Denver.
The case comes as the latest wrinkle in the legal struggle between gay rights and religious freedom as same-sex marriages and commitment ceremonies become more commonplace. On the front lines are those in wedding-related business, including cake shop employees, photographers and caterers.
Charlie Craig and Dave Mullins filed a complaint after Jack Phillips, owner of the Masterpiece Cakeshop in Lakewood, Colo., declined in July 2012 to bake a cake for their wedding reception because he said it conflicts with his religious beliefs.
Mr. Craig and Mr. Mullins were planning to marry in Massachusetts, where two men can legally marry, and hold a reception afterward in Denver.
"I'm a follower of Jesus Christ, so you could say this is a religious belief," Mr. Phillips told Denver Fox affiliate KDVR-TV. "I believe the Bible teaches that this is not an OK thing."
The American Civil Liberties Union of Colorado, which represents the couple, says Mr. Phillips' stance conflicts with Colorado civil-rights law, which bans retail businesses from discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation.
"The Masterpiece owners have claimed their policy is based on their 'reading of the Word of God.' But their business is not a house of worship," the ACLU said Thursday in a press release. "While bakery owners are free to practice their faith and to personally oppose same-sex marriage, they cannot use those beliefs as an excuse to disrespect and discriminate against customers."
The Colorado case is one of a half-dozen wedding-related clashes nationwide. A lesbian couple in Oregon is exploring legal action after being turned down earlier this year for a wedding cake by two bakeries, according to the Willamette Week.
The Baltimore Sun reported that the owner of an Annapolis trolley company decided to stop providing rides for all just-married couples rather than do so for gay couples under the state's recently passed same-sex marriage law.
Thomas Peters, spokesman for the National Organization for Marriage, said retailers have a First Amendment right to follow their religious convictions against same-sex marriage. He also argued that business owners are not discriminating because they're willing to provide services for gay individuals, just not those related to gay marriages.
"This begs the question of whether marriage itself somehow represents sexual-orientation discrimination," Mr. Peters said.
Same-sex couples say they're being singled out, arguing that the same bakeries are willing to provide cakes for other events that flout Christian principles, such as divorce celebrations, weddings involving divorced people and baby showers for unmarried couples.
In Colorado, a second same-sex pair called Masterpiece Cakeshop and asked for a cake for a dog wedding. The bakery agreed to provide the cake, according to the ACLU.
"Imagine being told that the love between you and your partner is less legitimate than a dog wedding," the ACLU press release said.
Critics dismiss those examples as publicity stunts. Nicolle Martin, an attorney representing Mr. Phillips, said a court ruling against her client would "force him to choose between his conscience and a paycheck."
"We don't believe that this is a case about commerce," Ms. Martin told The Associated Press. "At its heart, this is a case about conscience."
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Valerie Richardson covers politics and the West from Denver. She can be reached at email@example.com.
- Critics rail against liberal bias for commencement speakers
- Harry Reid blasts Bundy ranch supporters as 'domestic terrorists'
- 'Culture of intimidation' seen in Nevada ranch standoff
- Defiant Reid vows Bundy ranch confrontation 'not over'
- Nevada Bundy ranch standoff could leave dirt on Harry Reid reputation
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Women losing coverage under Obamacare, too
- Scalia to students on high taxes: At a certain point, 'perhaps you should revolt'
- Former Ranger breaks silence on Pat Tillman death: I may have killed him
- Special Forces' suicide rates hit record levels casualties of 'hard combat'
- Feds approve powdered alcohol; 'Palcohol' available later this year
- U.S. Navy to turn seawater into jet fuel
- Justice at last: 'Evil woman' outed for grabbing girl's game ball
- CHARLES: Holder's undermining of the law deserving of contempt
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- Jews being told to register in Ukraine: John Kerry
- EDITORIAL: Republicans finally fight back in phony 'war on women'
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.