- Florida lawmakers move to wipe corrupt ‘Boss Hogg’ town from map
- N.C. math whiz to unveil secret of March Madness picks
- An appealing offer: Chiquita merges with Fyffes to make world’s largest banana firm
- Amnesty International says Syria guilty of war crimes for food blockade
- Mitch McConnell on beating tea party: ‘We are going to crush them’
- Adam Lanza’s dad: He would’ve killed me ‘in a heartbeat’
- North Korea holds election: 100% turnout, Kim Jong-un gets — 100% of vote
- Gentlemen, start your drones: Judge’s ruling opens door for commercial use
- Soldier who hid, bragged about not saluting flag to be punished — in secret
- ‘Maverick’ of the seas: ‘Top Gun’ school for U.S. ship officers to launch
Sen. Mark Udall: ‘We can be safe and protect our civil liberties’
Lawmakers tackled domestic phone surveillance Sunday, agreeing that more debate is needed on the depth of such data collection and its use.
“We can be safe and protect our civil liberties,” said Sen. Mark Udall, Colorado Democrat, on CNN’s “State of the Union.” Mr. Udall suggested that the Patriot Act may need to be re-opened. “Let’s have the debate.”
This so-called metadata involves computers scouring through raw call data without the use of names or conversation content. If something is flagged, then investigators may choose to go to court to be granted access to more information, such as who made the calls and what was said.
“You can extrapolate” a lot of data using this, Mr. Udall said. “We value our privacy as Americans.”
Sen. John McCain, Arizona Republican, also supports more discussion of the parameters of obtaining such information, but he doesn’t object to the measures taken so far, saying he is “not really” bothered by the NSA actions.
He also said that if this were Sept. 12, 2001, that we wouldn’t even be having this discussion.
“The threat [of terrorism] is growing, not diminishing,” Mr. McCain said.
He also disagreed with comments made earlier by Sen. Rand Paul, Kentucky Republican, who called the phone-record collection an assault on the Constitution.
When pressed about what’s the harm in gathering this metadata, Mr. Udall stressed that it hasn’t been proved to work and that this is “only another step” toward crossing a line.
He said “it’s the scale” that concerns him and the fact that it was a secret program.
Other lawmakers have said important information was obtained from such data collection, but Mr. Udall dismissed that.
“I’m not convinced. We could have gotten that from other data,” he said.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
TWT Video Picks
Taxpayers must pay the freight for over-budget train projects
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- Rand Paul wins 2014 CPAC straw poll, Ted Cruz finishes a distant second
- Investigators puzzle: How does a 777 jetliner just disappear into thin air?
- Russia besieges Crimea as U.S. seeks diplomacy; Putin remains undeterred by Obama's sanctions
- As Crimea falls, Obama takes Key Largo golf vacation, Biden hits Virgin Islands
- Senate Democrats, Republicans spar over restoring unemployment benefits
- CURL: Today's GOP really is Reagan's 'Big Tent' party
- Adam Lanza's dad: He would've killed me 'in a heartbeat'
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
Pope Francis meets his 'mini-me'
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Winter storm hits states — again