- ISIL creates all-female brigade to terrorize women into following Sharia law
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama to Latin leaders: Help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
SIMMONS: Nation has come a long way on voting rights
Question of the Day
All eyes and ears are on Washington, D.C., where this month, perhaps as soon as Monday, the Supreme Court is expected to take the blinders off and rule on challenges to the seminal Voting Rights Act of 1965, whose signing by then-President Johnson drew women attired in hats and gloves, and had whites and blacks sharing near picture-perfect space in the White House as witnesses to history.
The law itself, as well as the attire worn by many of the women at the signing, represents a bygone era, a time when local, state and federal laws and private industry's policies blocked schoolhouse doors, polling booths and prohibited blacks from even trying on clothing and shoes in department stores.
Generally speaking, the Voting Rights Act prohibits voting practices that discriminate on the basis of race, color or membership in a minority group. But that is not why the Supreme Court's calendar has us waiting with bated breath.
Everyone is at attention because the court has already heard arguments on Section 5, the part of the act that explains the so-called preclearance doctrine, which mandates Justice Department approval of states' and localities' proposed voting changes.
Those changes range from voter ID laws to precinct changes to redistricting.
In Oxford, Ala., for instance, when local officials turned Byname School into Bynam Community Center, they had to get Justice Department approval to change the name of the building because it serves as a polling site.
The process took about two months.
Now, with all the racially motivated bloodletting that occurred in Alabama and elsewhere in the deep and near South back in the day, I'm hardly the one to say let all bygones be bygones.
But really, baby, we've come a long way since white men were the only ones empowered with voting rights, and that, I suspect, is what some members of the high court will consider.
Indeed, if states like Texas and South Carolina really and truly want to institute voter ID laws, smart lawmakers would first institute policies that make it easier for the disabled, the extremely poor and those deeply embedded in rural America to get government-issued identification.
Still, you cannot compare a building's name change to poll taxes or any of the asinine questions and tests that blacks were required to answer correctly or "pass" in order to register to vote.
Those white-gloved women who witnessed the signing of the Voting Rights Act were denied rights that whites had always enjoyed, and praise the Lord the men controlling the White House and Congress rewrote that script in 1965 — two generations after women won that same right.
No, the Deep South isn't what it used to be, thanks to good ol' fashioned American democracy, lots of bloodshed and hell raising, and the First Amendment.
If the Supreme Court doesn't nix or call for modifications to the much-debated sections of the Voting Rights Act, then America is in deep trouble.
All gloves will be off — proving justice isn't blind at all.
• Deborah Simmons can be reached at email@example.com
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Award-winning opinion writer Deborah Simmons is a senior correspondent who reports on City Hall and writes about education, culture, sports and family-related topics. Mrs. Simmons has worked at several newspapers, and since joining The Washington Times in 1985, has served as editorial-page editor and features editor and on the metro desk. She has taught copy editing at the University of ...
- SIMMONS: What happened in Vegas can't stay in Vegas
- SIMMONS: Tell Joe Biden and the NAACP that politics aren't black and white
- SIMMONS: Youthful sounds of music stirring in Prince George's County
- 'No cellphone' sidewalk pops up in D.C.
- SIMMONS: Archie Andrews saves the gay
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- Ted Nugent loses second casino gig for 'racist remarks'
- Russia shipping sophisticated weapons systems to Ukraine separatists
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- Let it roll: D.C. Council hits Las Vegas on taxpayer's dime, leaves $14,000 tab
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq