- Obama not worried about Ebola at upcoming African summit in D.C.
- Obama: ‘We tortured some folks’ after 9/11
- Obama administration asked whole D.C. Circuit to take on major Obamacare case
- Mark Levin: Topple GOP leadership or country will ‘unravel’
- Massachusetts to let police chief deny gun buys to those deemed unfit
- John Kerry condemns attack on Israeli soldiers, kidnapping
- U.S. starts to evacuate American Ebola patients from West Africa: Report
- Geraldo slammed as ‘dummy’ for backing Clinton’s bin Laden claim
- Israeli spokesman: No need to debate who broke the cease-fire
- 35 Palestinians killed; Israeli officer missing
India key to success of Washington’s Asia ‘pivot’
Question of the Day
India, the world’s most populous democracy, may hold the keys to success for the Obama administration’s self-described foreign-policy “pivot” to Asia, a bipartisan panel of analysts told Congress on Wednesday.
If the pivot’s strategic goal is to counter the rise of China as a global power, U.S. officials would be wise to nurture economic, defense and diplomatic ties with New Delhi, lawmakers on the House Subcommittee on Asia and the Pacific were told in prepared remarks from the analysts.
“Simply put, a fast-growing democratic and pluralistic nation of 1.2 billion people acts as an obvious counterweight to any hegemonic ambitions an authoritarian China may hold,” Sadanand Dhume, a resident fellow at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, told the subcommittee.
The U.S.-India relationship has tightened during recent years. Bilateral trade between the two has surged by 40 percent since 2009, and, Mr. Dhume said, U.S. weapons sales to New Delhi now “total close to $9 billion as India modernizes its armed forces, partly in response to massive Chinese spending on its own defense capabilities.”
But those developments also have coincided with a significant slowdown in India’s domestic economy in recent years. In light of the slowdown, Mr. Dhume said, Washington should be taking steps to “deepen engagement with India” by opening the door for enhanced ties between New Delhi and U.S. allies in the region, particularly Japan.
The U.S. also should consider “championing India’s membership” in the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC), a free-trade forum that reaches across East Asia, added Vikram Nehru, a senior associate in the Asia Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
“India’s presence would make APEC a more inclusive institution, which would be more likely to serve U.S. interests,” Mr. Nehru said.
India’s overall relationship with East Asia and Washington is complicated, however, by New Delhi’s potential economic dependence on China. And, depending on the region’s overall economic and geopolitical trends, such dependence has the potential to lessen New Delhi’s willingness to work with Washington toward countering China’s rise.
“From the Indian perspective, China is first a neighbor — a relatively strong one that the Indian foreign policy and security establishments are loath to provoke,” said Walter Lohman, who heads the Asian Studies Program at the Heritage Foundation. “For India, China is [an] economic opportunity. It is India’s largest trading partner, and each has nascent, growing investment interests in the other.”
On the security front, meanwhile, U.S. leaders should be paying closer attention to the potentially negative impact that the impending withdrawal of U.S. military forces from Afghanistan will have on U.S.-India relations.
The Obama administration has said that U.S. forces will depart by 2014.
But unlike Washington, “India doesn’t have the luxury of simply pivoting away from the badlands of the so-called AfPak region,” said Mr. Dhume, referring to the volatile area between Afghanistan and Pakistan, the latter of which shares a long and contentious border with India.
“If the U.S. is seen as cutting and running by its Islamist foes, and this results in an upsurge of violence in both Afghanistan and India as in the 1990s, it will reduce trust between Washington and New Delhi,” he said, adding that such circumstances likely would force India to “focus more on interests closer to home than farther afield in East Asia.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Guy Taylor is the National Security Team Leader at The Washington Times, overseeing the paper’s State Department, Pentagon and intelligence community coverage. He’s also a frequent guest on The McLaughlin Group and C-SPAN.
His series on political, economic and security developments in Mexico won a 2012 Virginia Press Association award.
Prior to rejoining The Times in 2011, his work was ...
- Israel's ambassador praises Obama, slams Human Rights Watch report
- U.S. intelligence nearly certain pro-Russian separatists downed Malaysian Airlines flight
- U.S. scrambles as violence escalates in Israel-Hamas conflict
- MH17: Fear of ground-to-air missile strike becomes nightmare reality in Ukraine
- U.S., China to participate in unprecedented joint ground force exercise
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Orrin G. Hatch
Procedural changes impede the chamber's traditional deliberative function
- U.N. condemns Israel, U.S. for not sharing Iron Dome with Hamas
- Border agents cleared of civil rights complaints from illegal immigrant children
- Obama military strategy too weak for future security, panel reports
- Ben Carson takes major step toward presidential campaign
- Porn-surfing feds blame boredom, lack of work for misbehavior
- Pentagon wants extra $19M to equip, train Ukrainian troops
- 'Big Bang' star Mayim Bialik helps send bulletproof vests to IDF
- Feds raid S.C. home to seize Land Rover in EPA emission-control crackdown
- Australia issues arrest warrant for men believed to be homegrown ISIL terrorists
- Iraq Christians get meeting with top Obama aide
Top 10 U.S. military helicopters
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors