- Marco Rubio: U.S. at social, moral crossroads
- ‘We’re coming for you, Barack Obama’: Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL
- White flags baffle NYPD: ‘We’re lucky it wasn’t a bomb’
- N.Y. Gov. Cuomo’s office interfered with, pressured corruption commission: report
- Brit lawmaker: I would fire on Israel if I lived in Gaza
- VA apologizes to forgotten Marine veteran locked in Fla. clinic, forced to call 911
- U.S. social and economic trends on worrisome track, survey finds
- McDonald nomination unanimously referred to full Senate
- Chuck Norris honorary chairman of NRA voter registration campaign
- GOP outraged Obamacare investigators able to get coverage with fake IDs
Stiffer charge sought for making threats in Maryland
Question of the Day
Two men arrested after threatening to go on shooting sprees last year in Prince George’s County faced misdemeanor charges that were far less severe than the nature of the threats made, according to prosecutors supporting legislation that would make it a felony to issue threats of mass violence in Maryland.
Describing a July incident in which a Crofton, Md., man made threats to his former employer over the phone that referenced the movie theater shootings in Aurora, Colo., Prince George’s County State’s Attorney Angela D. Alsobrooks said current state law fell short.
“We felt that this crime warrants some sort of response but learned through that that we had a limited response, which was that we could only file telephone misuse charges,” Ms. Alsobrooks said as she testified in favor of the bill Wednesday in Annapolis.
Police arrested Neil Prescott, 28, and found 25 legally owned guns and a stockpile of ammunition at his home. He was hospitalized for a mental evaluation and is set for trial next week on charges of telephone misuse. Mr. Prescott faces a maximum three years in jail.
In a separate case last March, a University of Maryland, College Park student made threats in an online chat room about going on a shooting spree on the campus.
“I’m going to kill people tomorrow, including myself,” student Alexander Song wrote in the online conversations. “I do need help, but I’m going to go on a rampage and kill people before I get that help.”
Though police did not find any weapons in Mr. Song’s possession after raiding his family home and on-campus dorm room, authorities took the threat seriously and charged him with eight criminal counts. Mr. Song pleaded guilty to disturbing activities at school and to telephone misuse and was sentenced to three years of supervised probation.
“Maryland is only one of seven states that does not have some type of criminal statute that deals with threats of mass violence or threats of terrorism,” Ms. Alsobrooks said.
The proposed bill, which was sponsored by Delegate Kriselda Valderrama, Prince George’s Democrat, would make the offense punishable by up to 10 years in prison or a $10,000 fine. The law would apply to both oral and written threats that cause five or more people to be “placed in fear that the crime will be committed” or take some sort of action as a result of the threat — such as evacuating or taking shelter.
While no one spoke against the proposed legislation, lawmakers at hearings on the bill Tuesday and Wednesday questioned why current laws were not enough to prosecute the individuals cited as examples.
“Could you charge for reckless endangerment for that?” asked Delegate Sam Arora, Montgomery Democrat, of the College Park student’s threats.
After reviewing the exact statute for reckless endangerment, Deputy State’s Attorney Tara Jackson said prosecutors would have had a difficult time showing that a “threat over the Internet caused a substantial risk of death.”
While the majority of states have laws prohibiting general threats, their punishments vary.
A threat made in writing or online in Virginia is punishable by up to five years in prison, though if the threat is for an act of terrorism the crime is punishable by up to 10 years. In the District, a threat to kidnap or injure another person is punishable by up to 20 years behind bars.
Ms. Valderrama called a similar law in Maryland “needed legislation” that would fill in as another prosecutorial tool.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Andrea Noble is a crime and public safety reporter for The Washington Times. She can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Term limits still in question after 22 years in Prince George's County
- ACLU slams Gray on issues of transparency
- D.C. police quietly prepping for change in law on marijuana
- Council overrides mayor's veto of fiscal 2015 budget
- 3 killed, 4 wounded Sunday in three D.C. shootings
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
The subsidies are a hit with patients who don't exist
- Democratic Sen. John Walsh plagiarized War College master's thesis: report
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Netanyahu's Wikipedia page replaced with giant Palestinian flag
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- House task force to recommend National Guard on border, faster deportations
- Hamas orders civilians to die in Israeli airstrikes
- Hezbollah warring in Syria could join fight against Israel
- Family removed from Southwest flight over tweet about rude agent, dad says
- CARSON: Costco and the perils of mixing politics and business
- CANNON: With Russia, different airline crash, same results
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq