- Putin calls Internet ‘CIA project’ that must be controlled
- Muslims offended that 9/11 museum movie speaks of jihad
- Obama marks Armenian massacre, avoids using the word ‘genocide’
- Gov. Rick Perry: ‘It’s not a dare, it’s a promise’; Texas will fight BLM
- Howard Dean cheers Obama’s approach to Russian aggression
- Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s childhood nickname? ‘The Surprise’
- Democrat Grimes backs Keystone XL pipeline in Kentucky Senate race
- China spends for 17 new warships as U.S. cuts back military
- In Japan, Obama plays soccer with a robot and warns students of climate change
- FDA proposes ban on e-cigarette sales to minors
CPAC 2013: Jindal says growth, not austerity, the best path for GOP
Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal challenged the recent Republican drumbeat decrying bloated government spending and deficits Friday, saying that the conservative movement’s “obsession with zeroes” and federal spending only serves to narrow the political discourse to its opponents’ turf.
After rehashing some jokes from the recent Gridiron Club dinner — “You know, I understand because of the sequester, the president’s secret service detail has been replaced by Joe Biden with a shotgun” — Mr. Jindal outlined a different path for conservatives to win the argument and then win elections, paraphrasing former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher.
“Right now, we’ve got one party that wants to be in charge of the federal government so they can expand it,” he said. “We’ve got another party that wants to be in charge of the federal government so they can get it under control. I’m here to tell you that’s a terrible debate. It is a debate that is fought entirely on our opponents’ terms.”
He called such a tussle “a very small and short-sighted debate.”
“If our vision isn’t greater than that, we don’t deserve to win,” he said. “Today’s conservatism is in love with zeroes. … It is the wrong game for us to be playing.”
“We must not become the party of austerity — we must become the party of growth,” he continued. “Of course we know that government’s out of control. The public knows that, too. And yet we just lost an election. We must not continue to fight on our opponents’ terms.”
Still, a broad overhaul of the party’s core values isn’t the answer either, he said.
“Our principles are timeless,” he said. “We already have one liberal party in America — we don’t need another one. But we do need to re-orient our focus to the place conservatism thrives in the real world beyond Washington and beyond the Beltway.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
David Sherfinski covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at email@example.com.
- Supreme Court pushes consideration of N.J. gun case to April 25
- Supreme Court weighs appeal to concealed-carry gun laws
- Michael Bloomberg charts $50M challenge to NRA: 'Got to make them afraid'
- McAuliffe's PAC off to fast start, with $254,000 raised in two weeks
- Virginia Republican Bob Marshall stands by remarks that raise eyebrows
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Andrew P. Napolitano
Obama's veil of secrecy is pierced
- Obamacare class-action suit opens a new legal front
- Obama avoids 'red line' for China, prepared to impose tougher sanctions on Russia
- 'Top Gun' for drones: Squadrons of carrier-based killers have Navy's approval
- Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy hailed as patriot, ripped as lawless deadbeat
- 'Conservatives' should feel exposed by Bundy's racist comments: Scarborough
- Texas is next! AG warns BLM wants 90,000 acres after Bundy ranch standoff
- Sold out: Ukraine's leadership swapped best military weapons for cash
- America is an oligarchy, not a democracy or republic, university study finds
- In its hunt for Senate, Republican candidates campaign against Harry Reid
- Opposition rising to Colorado gun control laws
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Celebrity deaths in 2014