- Marionville mayor ‘kind of agreed’ with Kansas City shooter’s views
- Rev. Al Sharpton’s Easter message: Politically ‘crucified’ Obama has risen again
- Supreme Court to weigh challenge to ban on campaign lies
- UNICEF launches ‘Mr. Poo’ mascot in India to curb public defecation
- Teen taking selfie by train: ‘Wow, that guy just kicked me in the head’
- Goodbye, Afghanistan — hello, Africa: Air Force to shift as U.S. exits Middle East
- Iran mulls ban on vasectomies, decrease on abortions to bolster population
- CNN op-ed claims right-wingers ‘more deadly than jihadists’
- Classes resume at high school rocked by stabbings
- ABC News accuses Center for Public Integrity of stealing Pulitzer-winning work
CPAC 2013: Jindal says growth, not austerity, the best path for GOP
Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal challenged the recent Republican drumbeat decrying bloated government spending and deficits Friday, saying that the conservative movement’s “obsession with zeroes” and federal spending only serves to narrow the political discourse to its opponents’ turf.
After rehashing some jokes from the recent Gridiron Club dinner — “You know, I understand because of the sequester, the president’s secret service detail has been replaced by Joe Biden with a shotgun” — Mr. Jindal outlined a different path for conservatives to win the argument and then win elections, paraphrasing former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher.
“Right now, we’ve got one party that wants to be in charge of the federal government so they can expand it,” he said. “We’ve got another party that wants to be in charge of the federal government so they can get it under control. I’m here to tell you that’s a terrible debate. It is a debate that is fought entirely on our opponents’ terms.”
He called such a tussle “a very small and short-sighted debate.”
“If our vision isn’t greater than that, we don’t deserve to win,” he said. “Today’s conservatism is in love with zeroes. … It is the wrong game for us to be playing.”
“We must not become the party of austerity — we must become the party of growth,” he continued. “Of course we know that government’s out of control. The public knows that, too. And yet we just lost an election. We must not continue to fight on our opponents’ terms.”
Still, a broad overhaul of the party’s core values isn’t the answer either, he said.
“Our principles are timeless,” he said. “We already have one liberal party in America — we don’t need another one. But we do need to re-orient our focus to the place conservatism thrives in the real world beyond Washington and beyond the Beltway.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
David Sherfinski covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at email@example.com.
- Michael Bloomberg charts $50M challenge to NRA: 'Got to make them afraid'
- McAuliffe's PAC off to fast start, with $254,000 raised in two weeks
- Virginia Republican Bob Marshall stands by remarks that raise eyebrows
- Obama urged to enforce ban on importing military-style firearms
- Va. Senate approves Medicaid expansion, but budget stands no chance in House
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By John R. Bolton
Reality calls for attaching Gaza to Egypt and the West Bank to Jordan
- 'Culture of intimidation' seen in Nevada ranch standoff
- Rand and Ron Paul ride to the rescue for Bundy in Nevada standoff with feds
- Atheists rush to stage Easter display: 'Jesus Christ is a myth'
- Removal of military gear limits options for U.S., NATO in Ukraine
- CNN op-ed claims right-wingers 'more deadly than jihadists'
- U.S. Navy to turn seawater into jet fuel
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- Nevada Bundy ranch standoff could leave dirt on Harry Reid reputation
- CARSON: Recovering Tocqueville's vision of American exceptionalism
- GOP writes legislation to deny Attorney General Eric Holder his salary
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.