- Gentlemen, start your drones: Judge’s ruling opens door for commercial use
- Soldier who hid, bragged about not saluting flag to be punished — in secret
- ‘Maverick’ of the seas: ‘Top Gun’ school for U.S. ship officers to launch
- Putin declares Sochi Paralympics open amid Ukrainian protest
- ‘In Jesus name, we pray’ sparks ire at Ohio council meeting
- Navy’s first laser weapon ready for prime time; drone killer to deploy this summer
- Billionaire backer: Rick Santorum ‘needs to be heard’ in 2016
- Obamacare fallout: 49 percent pessimistic; 45 percent ‘scared’
- DHS accused of holding U.S. citizen at airport, using emails to pry into her sex life
- Seattle socialist: Minimum-wage discussion skewed by ‘right-wing’ GAO analysis
Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell assailed on transportation
Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell appeared last month to have brokered a landmark, legacy-making bipartisan compromise on transportation funding. But just three weeks later, the $880 million plan is facing withering attacks from Republicans, criticism from a regional transportation body and even questions about whether parts of the bill might be unconstitutional.
Right-wing Republicans have urged the governor to veto the bill or remove its tax increases, and other groups have piled on with their own concerns.
Despite the pressure from his party, many analysts say the legislation means too much to Mr. McDonnell’s legacy and political future for him to turn back now.
“I can’t imagine him putting the kind of energy he put into getting this passed, only to veto it because he got some criticism,” said Quentin Kidd, director of the Wason Center for Public Policy at Christopher Newport University. “This is the one big piece of legacy legislation that he’s got under his belt.”
The need to improve Virginia’s congested roads and infrastructure has been an ongoing issue in the state, but Mr. McDonnell has been criticized for driving passage of a bill that will increase the state sales tax from 5 percent to 5.3 percent and allow an additional sales tax in Northern Virginia and Hampton Roads.
The governor’s role in the plan’s passage was the likely reason that he was not invited to speak at last week’s Conservative Political Action Conference. The blow to his conservative credentials was evident in the conference’s presidential straw poll, where he placed outside the top 10, a year after speaking at CPAC and being mentioned as a possible running mate or Cabinet member for 2012 GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney.
“People who are opposed to tax increases under any circumstances are going to make life difficult for the governor in the future,” said Stephen Farnsworth, a political science professor at the University of Mary Washington. “There’s no doubt that some Republicans would view him as less than fully committed to their vision of Republicanism.”
Aside from criticism by Republicans, the transportation plan has also been hit by the Northern Virginia Transportation Authority, an unelected body that wrote in a letter last week that it wants the governor to remove language that would dissolve the regional taxes if their revenues are used improperly by local governments.
Paul Goldman, former chairman of the Democratic Party of Virginia, has even cast doubts on the legality of state-enacted regional taxes — arguing that the additional taxes in Northern Virginia and Hampton Roads violate a state constitutional requirement that taxes be applied evenly throughout the state.
“There’s no way in good conscience that you could read the constitution of Virginia as saying that a majority of legislators can put a tax on whatever region they want,” he said. “It is strictly a tax to raise money on a handful of people because you can.”
Mr. Goldman drew parallels between this year’s plan and an aborted 2007 transportation proposal under Democratic former Gov. Tim Kaine, which the Virginia Supreme Court struck down as unconstitutional in 2008 because it gave taxing power to nonelected transportation authorities in Hampton Roads and Northern Virginia.
He said the issues with this year’s plan aren’t as blatantly questionable but that he could see a legal challenge on the horizon.
Mr. Kidd said he thinks the regional taxes could stand up to a legal challenge, pointing to the fact that Virginia has long charged an additional 2.1-percent sales tax on gas in Northern Virginia to help pay for rail systems.
He said Mr. McDonnell might consider removing some minor taxes or fees from the bill but that he’s more likely to stick to his guns than to veto the plan or send an altered version back to the assembly that they might reject.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
David Hill joined The Washington Times in February 2011 as a Maryland political reporter. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Md. drivers could face eventual doubling of gas tax
- Federal appeals court restores Maryland's concealed carry law
- Md. bill would end student suspensions for mimicking gun behavior
- Maryland Senate passes bill decriminalizing small amounts of marijuana
- Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell assailed on transportation
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Taxpayers must pay the freight for over-budget train projects
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- Rand Paul wins 2014 CPAC straw poll, Ted Cruz finishes a distant second
- Senate Democrats, Republicans spar over restoring unemployment benefits
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- CURL: The modern GOP really is Reagan's 'Big Tent' party
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
- U.S. deploys 12 F-16 fighter jets to Poland as exercise in response to Ukraine situation
- High schooler suing parents for money shot down by judge
- Six Senate seats could hinge on Keystone pipeline
- Russias Putin nominated for Nobel Peace Prize
Pope Francis meets his 'mini-me'
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Winter storm hits states — again