- Gentlemen, start your drones: Judge’s ruling opens door for commercial use
- Soldier who hid, bragged about not saluting flag to be punished — in secret
- ‘Maverick’ of the seas: ‘Top Gun’ school for U.S. ship officers to launch
- Putin declares Sochi Paralympics open amid Ukrainian protest
- ‘In Jesus name, we pray’ sparks ire at Ohio council meeting
- Navy’s first laser weapon ready for prime time; drone killer to deploy this summer
- Billionaire backer: Rick Santorum ‘needs to be heard’ in 2016
- Obamacare fallout: 49 percent pessimistic; 45 percent ‘scared’
- DHS accused of holding U.S. citizen at airport, using emails to pry into her sex life
- Seattle socialist: Minimum-wage discussion skewed by ‘right-wing’ GAO analysis
SHAW: The ‘P.C.’ dumbing down of U.S. schools
U.S. campuses succumb to groupthink
U.S. colleges and universities are drowning in a sea of “political correctness,” and many of higher education’s “best and brightest” don’t recognize the danger.
Indeed, speech codes and groupthink are so prevalent on American campuses that we now take them for granted.
Instead of meekly accepting the edicts of the thought police, however, students and faculty should be fighting them. Consider the following examples of political correctness, starting with a classic:
Seeing only what they want to see: Sensitivity and tolerance are supposed to be hallmarks of today’s “diverse” universities. Yet sensitivity to America’s Sept. 11 survivors was missing when, soon after the terrorist attacks, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill freshmen were required to read Michael Sells‘ rosy view of Islam, “Approaching the Qur’an: The Early Revelations.”
As my colleague George Leef observed at the time, little of value is learned from a study of the “pleasant parts” of the Koran. What Americans really need to understand is why jihadists hate us and the source of that hate.
The truth is that the Koran is also a source of Islamic fundamentalist intolerance. The “religion of love and peace” isn’t always loving and peaceful. If we see only what we want to see, we don’t learn anything.
Where you came from still matters: The Rev. Martin Luther King’s dream of a colorblind society is long gone in academia. With higher education’s pervasive system of formal and informal preferences and quotas, ethnic origin matters as never before.
In the world of political correctness, diversity is the “Holy Grail.” To look good among their peers, colleges need to have appropriate percentages of minority students and faculty. This has led to all sorts of abuses.
Blond, blue-eyed Elizabeth Warren, a former college professor elected to the U.S. Senate last November, claimed when she served on the University of Pennsylvania and Harvard University faculties that she was part American Indian. She denies using the designation to improve her chances of getting hired, but it’s clear that Harvard counted her as a “minority” in its federally mandated faculty profile. The trouble is, Ms. Warren’s American Indian blood, if she has any, is so diluted that many in her family deny it exists.
The now-deceased Sen. Hubert H. Humphrey, Minnesota Democrat, once said he’d “eat [his] hat” if affirmative action ever turned into quotas. It did, but he didn’t.
Origins may matter, but the Constitution doesn’t: In 2007, the University of North Carolina held a student convention to rewrite the U.S. Constitution. The new preamble, written in Chapel Hill, not Havana, included this thought: “Working for collective rights will create a more harmonious society.”
While understanding the collectivist mentality is a worthwhile academic undertaking, a more constructive use of the University of North Carolina’s resources might have been to help students better appreciate why our Constitution — stressing individual rights — is the oldest written constitution still in effect. Besides, how harmonious are the collectivist “paradises” of China, Cuba, North Korea, Turkmenistan and Venezuela?
Life and sex: It may be true that many college students are preoccupied with sex. Do the adults on campus have to encourage it?
Yale University, for example, observes Sex Week every other year, presumably to enhance healthy sex. The lusty lineup in 2010 featured pornographic filmmakers and sex consultants, therapists and sex workers, including a “professional dominatrix.” One speaker’s goal was to “challenge gender norms through porn,” while another discussed sex with multiple partners.
What was the purpose: education, better health or pandering?
TWT Video Picks
Taxpayers must pay the freight for over-budget train projects
Get Breaking Alerts
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- Rand Paul wins 2014 CPAC straw poll, Ted Cruz finishes a distant second
- Senate Democrats, Republicans spar over restoring unemployment benefits
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- CURL: The modern GOP really is Reagan's 'Big Tent' party
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
- U.S. deploys 12 F-16 fighter jets to Poland as exercise in response to Ukraine situation
- High schooler suing parents for money shot down by judge
- Six Senate seats could hinge on Keystone pipeline
- Russias Putin nominated for Nobel Peace Prize
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Time for feckless president to show resolve
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama reserves 'Chicago way' for GOP
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Public education would wither in free market
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Turkey not committed to Cyprus peace
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Spoiled-kid culture creates greedy adults