- George Zimmerman will not be charged in domestic dispute
- Russian officials press bilateral U.S. trade deal
- Selfies at Funerals blog creator retires after Obama flub: ‘Our work here is done’
- New Obama adviser Podesta is against Keystone but will steer clear of pipeline deliberations
- 40 Australian adults, children found in ‘one of the worst accounts of incest ever made public’
- Venezuela’s Maduro calls on student ‘price vigilantes’ to hit the streets, report businesses
- Atheists smug as Hindus join Satanists to demand display at Oklahoma Statehouse
- Bow before Valkyrie, NASA’s ‘superhero robot’ entry in DARPA challenge
- 10-year-old Pennsylvania boy suspended for pretend bow-and-arrow shooting
- Tea partiers turn on Capitol Hill budget deal
WOOD AND MARTIN: Smart alternatives to immigrant detention
Private-sector supervision can reduce flight risk
Congress held two hearings this month to examine the government's decision to release more than 2,000 immigrants from detention for budgetary reasons. The good news is that committee members of both parties used these hearings to focus on the core issue: our flawed immigration-detention system.
The government's purpose in detaining immigrants is not to punish them, but to ensure that they show up for hearings and comply with removal orders. In many cases, though, detention is not the best way to achieve these goals. Alternatives to detention are both routine and effective. They're employed every day, not just in the immigration system, but in the criminal justice systems of all 50 states and the federal government. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) would be wise to re-examine how it uses alternatives in order to best fulfill its mission.
ICE detains more than 400,000 immigrants in jails and jaillike facilities across the country each year, at a cost of $2 billion. Some people, particularly those who have been determined to pose a threat to public safety, need to be detained. For many others, however, ICE can compel appearance with much less drastic and much more cost-effective measures.Using sophisticated risk-assessment techniques such as those used in the criminal justice system, ICE can identify people whose flight risk can be mitigated and who don't threaten public safety. About half of immigrant detainees have no criminal record at all, and almost 90 percent have never been convicted of a violent crime, according to ICE. This group includes legal immigrants who overstayed their visas, border-crossers with strong community ties, and asylum-seekers who have fled persecution only to find themselves locked up in the United States.
Alternatives to detention programs work, particularly when coupled with a sensible overall strategy to ensure compliance. That's why a large and diverse collection of groups — including the Heritage Foundation, the International Association of Chiefs of Police, the National Conference of Chief Justices, the Council on Foreign Relations' Independent Task Force on U.S. Immigration Policy, and the Vera Institute of Justice — have endorsed alternatives.Used on a limited basis in the immigration system, alternatives to detention are developing a record of success. One alternative-to-detention program at ICE is called the Intensive Supervision Appearance Program II (ISAP II), and is run by a contractor, BI Inc. ICE determines the possible alternatives based on a person's risk profile, with options including a full-service program with case management and a technology-only program. In 2011, 96 percent of active participants in the full-service ISAP II programs showed up for their final hearing, and 84 percent complied with final orders.Alternatives cost taxpayers less than $9 per person per day, compared to $116 per person per day for those in detention. As the agency fine-tunes the program, it should become even more effective, especially if court proceedings for those in alternative-to-detention programs move ahead in a timely manner, which will require adequate funding of our nation's immigration courts.Congress shouldn't limit ICE's ability to develop new measures to ensure compliance. ICE must have the flexibility to address flight risk on a case-by-case basis. Like other law enforcement agencies, ICE needs to be able to make its detention decisions based on actual need and enforcement priorities.People from across the political spectrum are realizing that it pays to get tough on budgets by using alternatives to detention in the immigration system. It will be good news for the country if they make their voices heard as Congress tackles the budget and immigration reform in the weeks to come.
Julie Myers Wood, a former assistant secretary of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (20062008), is president of Guidepost Solutions LLC, whose clients include BI Inc. and other government contractors. Steve J. Martin, former general counsel for the Texas prison system, is a corrections consultant and lawyer.
By Donald Lambro
Growth spikes are little more than trend-free anomalies
Get Breaking Alerts
- Rand Paul: Budget deal 'shameful,' 'huge mistake'
- Tea partiers turn on Capitol Hill budget deal
- Teen thugs in D.C. run wild -- even while wearing GPS ankle bracelets
- Leon Panetta named as source of 'Zero Dark Thirty' scriptwriters information
- CARSON: Why did the founders give us the Second Amendment?
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- American bourbon now better than Scottish whisky: U.K.-born expert
- Obama's antics at Nelson Mandela tribute: Jovial conversation, handshake with Raul Castro
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
- VEGAS RULES: Harry Reid pushed feds to change ruling for casino's big-money foreigners