- Putin declares Sochi Paralympics open amid Ukrainian protest
- ‘In Jesus name, we pray’ sparks ire at Ohio council meeting
- Navy’s first laser weapon ready for prime time; drone killer to deploy this summer
- Billionaire backer: Rick Santorum ‘needs to be heard’ in 2016
- Obamacare fallout: 49 percent pessimistic; 45 percent ‘scared’
- DHS accused of holding U.S. citizen at airport, using emails to pry into her sex life
- Seattle socialist: Minimum-wage discussion skewed by ‘right-wing’ GAO analysis
- U.N. warns of Muslim ‘cleansing’ in Central African Republic
- Senate blocks change to military sex assault cases
- Drug mix may have cured child born with HIV, doctors say
Gunmakers fire back at Big Brother by pulling firearms from police, paychecks in gun-control states
Sellers target New York cops, government
In a protest against new gun laws, more than 100 firearms dealers say they will stop selling guns to government and law enforcement officials in New York and other states unless those same firearms are also available to average citizens.
It’s part of a backlash from the industry to new gun controls, and it follows major firearms companies, such as Beretta and Magpul, that have threatened to bolt Maryland and Colorado, respectively, if those states enact legislation to restrict military-style semiautomatic weapons or high-capacity ammunition magazines.
In early February, Texas-based LaRue Tactical changed its policy to “limit all sales to what law-abiding citizens residing in their districts can purchase or possess” because it did not want to risk triggering lawsuits with new gun laws either passed or pending.
“If you write the law, you live under the law, no special category of people just because you’re a government employee,” said Sean Sorrentino, a gun-rights advocate who keeps a tally at ncgunblog.com of companies that are adopting those kinds of policies.
The National Shooting Sports Foundation, the firearms industry trade association, said companies are free to independently decide the customers and markets they want to serve, but agreeing with others to boycott certain customers or markets raises serious legal questions concerning antitrust laws and may be illegal.
“Due to these antitrust concerns, NSSF is unable to promote this protest,” the group said. “We are also concerned that members of law enforcement are not made less safe due to the ill-advised decisions of antigun politicians.”
Gun owners tend to be fiercely loyal and the firearm companies are responsive to their clients. Owners launched a boycott of Smith & Wesson after the company signed an agreement with the Clinton administration voluntarily limiting some sales.
This year, companies are being proactive in defending their clients’ firearms rights — and their own markets.
New York has become a chief target after Gov. Andrew Cuomo in January signed the strictest gun control measures of any state in the country, including a beefed-up ban on so-called assault weapons and a prohibition on gun magazines that hold more than seven bullets — a law praised by New York City Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, a major gun control advocate, as protecting the Second Amendment while making the state’s residents safer.
Olympic Arms Inc. subsequently followed up with a policy specifically in regard to New York, saying that the state’s new gun controls have “caused a division of the people into classes.”
Going beyond mere sales policies, Magpul and Berretta have threatened to simply pack up and move because of proposed laws.
Richard Fitzpatrick, founder and president of Magpul, announced that the company would relocate if a Colorado bill banning ammunition magazines holding more than 15 rounds, or what he called “standard-capacity magazines,” becomes law.
Maryland-based Beretta, meanwhile, has been courted by multiple states after the company expressed dissatisfaction with that state’s push to pass gun controls, including bans on so-called assault weapons and high-capacity magazines.
At least one business — Shield Tactical — isn’t waiting. The company announced on its Facebook page last month the relocation of its retail division from California to Texas, though it did say in the announcement it plans to keep its training division in California “until the legislature outlaws everything.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
David Sherfinski covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- CPAC 2014: Huckabee says government impeding religious liberty
- CPAC 2014: Rick Perry to conservatives: 'You are the path to the future'
- CPAC 2014: McConnell works to reassure conservatives
- CPAC 2014: GOP optimism, agenda emerge at CPAC
- CPAC 2014: NRA's LaPierre says gun owners won't back down
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Tammy Bruce
- Bill Clinton cashes in on struggling nonprofit hospital
- Putin has transformed Russian army into a lean, mean fighting machine
- BRUCE: Obama's bizarre immigration rules
- IRS to turn over Lerner emails in tea party targeting probe
- Unemployment insurance vote could happen next week
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
- DELAY: A revolution for the Constitution
- PRUDEN: Likening Putin to Hitler on Ukraine shows Hillary's shaky grasp of history
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
Pope Francis meets his 'mini-me'
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Winter storm hits states — again