- The Washington Times - Monday, March 4, 2013

“I applied to speak and was ignored. I tried to get a room for an American Freedom Defense Initiative event, ‘The War on Free Speech,’ and was ignored. So, for the first time in five years, I won’t be at CPAC,” declares Pam Geller, the outspoken opponent of radical Islam, who has her own theories about the situation.

She joins New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie and the gay Republicans of GOProud among those also not invited to participate in the 40th annual Conservative Political Action Conference in mid-March, sparking yet another round of discussions among observers who ponder the wisdom of infighting while parsing the private decisions made by event organizers at the American Conservative Union.

Who’s in, who’s out? The situation presents a complex choice for conservatives.

Should the conservative group embrace all comers as critical midterm elections approach, ensuring all hands are indeed on deck and that an evolving Republican Party emerges victorious? Or should organizational leaders hold the line on authentic, established thinking, underscoring civility and traditional methods? It remains a tricky work in progress, but a vital one.


Actress Bette Davis once said, “If you want something done right, get three old broads to do it.” Ask Mike Huckabee, though, and he’ll vouch for the abilities of a half dozen former governors to solve the sequester crisis — or noncrisis — of implementing a 2.4 percent spending cut.

“Between the payroll tax hike, the doubled gas prices and the drop in incomes, most Americans have had to cut their own spending by far more than 2.4 percent,” Mr. Huckabee says.

“When I was governor of Arkansas, I had to cut spending by 10 percent. Somehow, schools stayed open and police still answered calls. In fact, if nobody in Washington can figure out how to cut 2.4 percent, then here’s my suggestion. Pick six former governors, three from each party, and give them two hours and lunch. They’ll find that much to cut before the fried pies arrive. I’d volunteer, but I doubt the president would trust me around the budget, or around the fried pies,” the former presidential hopeful concludes.


“The sequester has arrived! And this just in — life goes on.”

Fox Business News anchor Neil Cavuto, in a tweet Monday.


Uh-oh. Liberal bias has invaded Twitter. A yearlong, software-aided study of millions and millions of tweets during the 2012 election by the Pew Research Center reveals that “in some instances, the Twitter reaction was more pro-Democratic or liberal than the balance of public opinion.” Such events as news of President Obama’s re-election predictably sparked happy tweets.

“While polls showed that most voters said Mitt Romney gave the better performance in the first presidential debate, Twitter reaction was much more critical of Romney, according to an analysis of social media reaction to the debate,” the study noted.

“This tilt to the Twitter conversation was evident throughout the fall campaign. In nearly every week from early September through the first week of November, the Twitter conversation about Romney was substantially more negative than the conversation about Obama.”

Story Continues →