- Gentlemen, start your drones: Judge’s ruling opens door for commercial use
- Soldier who hid, bragged about not saluting flag to be punished — in secret
- ‘Maverick’ of the seas: ‘Top Gun’ school for U.S. ship officers to launch
- Putin declares Sochi Paralympics open amid Ukrainian protest
- ‘In Jesus name, we pray’ sparks ire at Ohio council meeting
- Navy’s first laser weapon ready for prime time; drone killer to deploy this summer
- Billionaire backer: Rick Santorum ‘needs to be heard’ in 2016
- Obamacare fallout: 49 percent pessimistic; 45 percent ‘scared’
- DHS accused of holding U.S. citizen at airport, using emails to pry into her sex life
- Seattle socialist: Minimum-wage discussion skewed by ‘right-wing’ GAO analysis
White House pushes for vote on contentious D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals nominee
Facing the stiffest Republican opposition to a judicial nominee in two years, the White House is pushing for a confirmation vote this week on Caitlin Halligan’s appointment to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
White House spokesman Jay Carney on Tuesday said Republican opponents to Ms. Halligan should back down and confirm her without delay.
The D.C. Circuit Court is hamstrung, he said, because the Senate has refused to confirm anyone since President Obama took office. There are currently four vacancies on the bench, two of which opened up since Ms. Halligan was first nominated in September 2010.
The nearly two-year delay in confirming “someone as clearly well-qualified as Ms. Halligan who has bipartisan support from lawyers and law enforcement” is particularly disappointing, Mr. Carney said. “In fact, the court has never been this understaffed in its history, and the caseload has increased almost 15 percent since 2011,” he said.
Republicans, led by Sen. Jeff Sessions, ardently oppose Ms. Halligan’s confirmation, arguing that she has taken extreme positions on gun rights, abortion and the war on terror.
They take particular exception to her views on the role federal courts should play on the detention and trial of terror suspects and enemy combatants. The D.C. Circuit plays a critical role in national security matters, including deciding the habeas petitions of terrorism suspects.
As a member of the New York City Bar Association's Committee on the Federal Courts, she jointed a 2004 report that came to the conclusion that the U.S. does not have the authority to indefinitely detain enemy combatants.
Republicans filibustered her nomination in December 2011 and repeatedly used Senate rules to send her nomination back to the White House. The White House has responded by renominating Ms. Halligan, the general counsel of the Manhattan district attorney’s office.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Nevada Democrat, backed down on threats to make major changes to filibuster rules at the beginning of this year. But Monday he said Republicans were not upholding their end of the bargain and by opposing Ms. Halligan are breaking a promise not to obstruct confirmations “for the sake of obstruction.”
The White House on Tuesday released an infographic on whitehouse.gov claiming that 78 percent of Mr. Obama’s circuit judge nominations have waited more than 100 days for a vote, compared to 15 percent of President Bush’s nominees.
Mr. Carney highlighted the information on a powerpoint slide during his Tuesday briefing with reporters. A second slide claimed that Mr. Obama’s district court nominees have faced similar delays with 42 percent having waited more than 100 days for a vote, compared to 8 percent of Bush’s nominees.
But Republicans, and some critics of the president on the left, counter that Mr. Obama is to blame for the delays because he has not made judicial nominations a priority, has been slow to nominate judges for the federal bench and is trying to play catch-up in his second term.
Sen. Chuck Grassley, Iowa Republican and the ranking member of the Judiciary Committee, said Mr. Obama’s two Supreme Court nominations sucked up a lot of the Senate’s time and since then the president only recently has started making judicial nominations a serious priority.
Still, Mr. Carney pointed to some positive signs of a potential break to the logjam on Capitol Hill when it comes to confirming judges.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Susan Crabtree is an award-winning investigative reporter with more than 15 years of reporting experience in Washington, D.C. Her reporting about bribery, corruption and conflict-of-interest issues on Capitol Hill has led to several FBI and ethics investigations, as well as consequences for members within their caucuses and at the ballot box. Susan can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- GOP senators want IG probe of Sebelius' 'Obamacare' fundraising
- Teaming up with Christie, Obama says Jersey shore 'back in business'
- No Moore: Obama flubs name of Oklahoma city devastated by tornado, calls it 'Monroe'
- Obama to Okla. tornado victims: 'We have got your back'
- Amid his own challenges, Obama calls on Navy grads to hold themselves accountable
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Taxpayers must pay the freight for over-budget train projects
- CPAC 2014: Rand Paul urges conservatives to fight for liberty
- Putin has transformed Russian army into a lean, mean fighting machine
- Soldier who hid to avoid saluting the flag to be punished in secret; Army won't release details
- EDITORIAL: Connecticut revolts against gun controls that could criminalize 300,000
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
- Bill Clinton cashes in on struggling nonprofit hospital
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- EDITORIAL: Harry Reid's corrupt Senate house of cards
- Russias Putin nominated for Nobel Peace Prize
Pope Francis meets his 'mini-me'
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Winter storm hits states — again