- NYT’s David Brooks: Obama has ‘manhood problem’ in Middle East
- Ted Cruz thanks Obama for denying visas to terrorists
- Survivors recall chaos, fear in Everest avalanche
- General Mills apologizes for ‘right to sue’ confusion, reverses policy
- Dealer wanted in U.S. for art fraud nabbed in Spain
- Easter morning delivery for space station
- Boxer Rubin ‘Hurricane’ Carter dies at 76
- Probe could complicate Rick Perry’s prospects
- Ukraine, Russia trade blame for eastern shootout
- Obamas head to church on Easter morning
White House pushes for vote on contentious D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals nominee
Facing the stiffest Republican opposition to a judicial nominee in two years, the White House is pushing for a confirmation vote this week on Caitlin Halligan’s appointment to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
White House spokesman Jay Carney on Tuesday said Republican opponents to Ms. Halligan should back down and confirm her without delay.
The D.C. Circuit Court is hamstrung, he said, because the Senate has refused to confirm anyone since President Obama took office. There are currently four vacancies on the bench, two of which opened up since Ms. Halligan was first nominated in September 2010.
The nearly two-year delay in confirming “someone as clearly well-qualified as Ms. Halligan who has bipartisan support from lawyers and law enforcement” is particularly disappointing, Mr. Carney said. “In fact, the court has never been this understaffed in its history, and the caseload has increased almost 15 percent since 2011,” he said.
Republicans, led by Sen. Jeff Sessions, ardently oppose Ms. Halligan’s confirmation, arguing that she has taken extreme positions on gun rights, abortion and the war on terror.
They take particular exception to her views on the role federal courts should play on the detention and trial of terror suspects and enemy combatants. The D.C. Circuit plays a critical role in national security matters, including deciding the habeas petitions of terrorism suspects.
As a member of the New York City Bar Association’s Committee on the Federal Courts, she jointed a 2004 report that came to the conclusion that the U.S. does not have the authority to indefinitely detain enemy combatants.
Republicans filibustered her nomination in December 2011 and repeatedly used Senate rules to send her nomination back to the White House. The White House has responded by renominating Ms. Halligan, the general counsel of the Manhattan district attorney’s office.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Nevada Democrat, backed down on threats to make major changes to filibuster rules at the beginning of this year. But Monday he said Republicans were not upholding their end of the bargain and by opposing Ms. Halligan are breaking a promise not to obstruct confirmations “for the sake of obstruction.”
If Republicans continue to hold up judicial nominations, Mr. Reid said the Senate’s inaction “will also have consequences.”
The White House on Tuesday released an infographic on whitehouse.gov claiming that 78 percent of Mr. Obama’s circuit judge nominations have waited more than 100 days for a vote, compared to 15 percent of President Bush’s nominees.
Mr. Carney highlighted the information on a powerpoint slide during his Tuesday briefing with reporters. A second slide claimed that Mr. Obama’s district court nominees have faced similar delays with 42 percent having waited more than 100 days for a vote, compared to 8 percent of Bush’s nominees.
But Republicans, and some critics of the president on the left, counter that Mr. Obama is to blame for the delays because he has not made judicial nominations a priority, has been slow to nominate judges for the federal bench and is trying to play catch-up in his second term.
Sen. Chuck Grassley, Iowa Republican and the ranking member of the Judiciary Committee, said Mr. Obama’s two Supreme Court nominations sucked up a lot of the Senate’s time and since then the president only recently has started making judicial nominations a serious priority.
Still, Mr. Carney pointed to some positive signs of a potential break to the logjam on Capitol Hill when it comes to confirming judges.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Susan Crabtree is an award-winning investigative reporter with more than 15 years of reporting experience in Washington, D.C. Her reporting about bribery, corruption and conflict-of-interest issues on Capitol Hill has led to several FBI and ethics investigations, as well as consequences for members within their caucuses and at the ballot box. Susan can be reached at email@example.com.
- GOP senators want IG probe of Sebelius' 'Obamacare' fundraising
- Teaming up with Christie, Obama says Jersey shore 'back in business'
- No Moore: Obama flubs name of Oklahoma city devastated by tornado, calls it 'Monroe'
- Obama to Okla. tornado victims: 'We have got your back'
- Amid his own challenges, Obama calls on Navy grads to hold themselves accountable
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Women losing coverage under Obamacare, too
- Scalia to students on high taxes: At a certain point, 'perhaps you should revolt'
- Former Ranger breaks silence on Pat Tillman death: I may have killed him
- Special Forces' suicide rates hit record levels casualties of 'hard combat'
- Feds approve powdered alcohol; 'Palcohol' available later this year
- Harry Reid blasts Bundy ranch supporters as 'domestic terrorists'
- U.S. Navy to turn seawater into jet fuel
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- NYT's David Brooks: Obama has 'manhood problem' in Middle East
- CHARLES: Holder's undermining of the law deserving of contempt
- Ted Cruz thanks Obama for denying visas to terrorists
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.