A second-term second chance

Tax reform could save the Obama presidency

Question of the Day

Is it still considered bad form to talk politics during a social gathering?

View results

It’s not too premature to say that President Obama’s second-term agenda is adrift — that is, if he ever had a well-thought-out agenda to begin with.

Little more than four months into his fifth year in office, the prospects of his legislative priorities remain murky at best, while his efforts to win support in Congress and rally the country behind his proposals have been greeted with a big, political yawn.

Even some of his liberal supporters in the news media are giving him failing grades for leadership on Capitol Hill and on his campaign-style efforts to build public support for his agenda at the grass-roots level.

“At this point in his presidency, Obama has pretty much tried it all. He has met privately with Republican leaders in the House, collaborated with bipartisan groups of senators and taken his case to the people,” The Washington Post said in a critical front-page evaluation Monday. “This year, for the most part, none of those approaches have worked.”

The president, known for his political aloofness, even among Democratic leaders on Capitol Hill, has tried to show a little warmth with legislative leaders who can make things happen for him, as Ronald Reagan did with his second-term agenda on tax-rate cuts. But the newspaper ruefully concedes that “Obama still isn’t very good at using his personal charm to achieve political success.”

Let’s go to the videotape record: His ambitious gun control proposals were shot down in the Democrat-run Senate when several members of his own party deserted him. His immigration reforms face an uncertain future in that chamber, too, and perhaps less of a chance in the GOP-controlled House. His tax-raising budget is dead.

Second-term presidencies often face difficult odds, and Mr. Obama’s may be tougher than most because of his narrow re-election margin in the popular vote and a strategic campaign decision to avoid a salient issue that polls showed was the voters’ No. 1 concern: a weak, job-scarce economy.

Reagan soared into his second term with a huge, 49-state mandate and a solidly recovering economy that was growing by nearly 6 percent. He had campaigned on a tax-rate-reducing, revenue-neutral plan to scrub dozens of income-tax exemptions, credits and other loopholes from the Internal Revenue Service code.

That plan, enacted with bipartisan support, brought in a lot of new revenue that was used in part to cut income-tax rates across the board and bring the top rate down to 28 percent. (The top rate under Mr. Obama for high-income taxpayers is now close to 40 percent, weakening capital investment, new business startups and job creation.)

If Mr. Obama were looking for a role model showing how he can reach out to both sides of the aisle, Reagan’s record is the place to start. His 1986 tax-rate reform plan was pushed on Capitol Hill by top Democrats, including Rep. Richard A. Gephardt of Missouri, who went on to become House Democratic leader, and by liberal Sen. Bill Bradley of New Jersey, among others.

While Mr. Obama has shown little if any sincere interest in pro-growth tax reform (he certainly didn’t campaign on this issue last year), it is being championed by Montana Sen. Max Baucus, the Democratic chairman of the tax-writing Senate Finance Committee.

Indeed, a Reagan-like tax-reform bill may have more support among Senate Democrats than the White House realizes at this point.

Not only is Mr. Baucus working on an ambitious legislative plan to overhaul the tax code to both boost revenues and reduce income-tax rates to spur growth, he has been meeting with his House Republican counterpart, Michigan Rep. Dave Camp, who chairs the tax-writing Ways and Means Committee. The two men have become allies in a common cause.

The growing tax-overhaul movement hasn’t been given much attention in the major media, but may be the sleeper issue of the new Congress — quietly working its way through a lengthy, obstacle-strewn legislative process.

While the bipartisan alliance formed by Mr. Baucus and Mr. Camp may be the most underreported story in the capital right how, it is gradually becoming the GOP’s legislative focus as the party prepares for the pivotal 2014 midterm elections.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story

© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks
You Might Also Like
  • Maureen McDonnell looks on as her husband, former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, made a statement on Tuesday after the couple was indicted on corruption charges. (associated press)

    PRUDEN: Where have the big-time grifters gone?

  • This photo taken Jan. 9, 2014,  shows New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie gesturing as he answers a question during a news conference  at the Statehouse in Trenton.  Christie will propose extending the public school calendar and lengthening the school day in a speech he hopes will help him rebound from an apparent political payback scheme orchestrated by key aides. The early front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination will make a case Tuesday Jan. 14, 2014, that children who spend more time in school graduate better prepared academically, according to excerpts of his State of the State address obtained by The Associated Press. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)

    BRUCE: Bombastic arrogance or humble determination? Chris Christie’s choice

  • ** FILE ** Secretary of State Hillary Rodham testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on the deadly September attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Chris Stevens and three other Americans. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

    PRUDEN: The question to haunt the West

  • Get Breaking Alerts