- The Washington Times - Friday, May 10, 2013

When President Obama tries to make the case that his policies have improved life in America, he isn’t talking about his hometown of Chicago.

The third-largest city in the United States, where Mr. Obama’s political career began, is the murder capital of the country, with one of our nation’s highest unemployment rates.

It is now “governed” — if one can say that with a straight face — by the president’s former chief of staff and top adviser, Rahm Emanuel, and a gang of incompetent Democrats who have taken a troubled city and made things a great deal worse.

It’s a city where jobs are scarce, unemployment has soared, the labor force is shrinking, businesses have fled, gun-wielding drug gangs are killing innocent people with near impunity, schools are dysfunctional, and City Hall seems incapable of taking control of the streets and making the city safe again.

Five-hundred-and-six Chicago residents were gunned down last year, up from 433 in 2011, and it’s headed for another record number this year. Just in the month of January, 43 people were fatally shot.

Mr. Emanuel, who’s been in office for nearly a year, watched the homicide rate climb through most of last year, but apparently without taking any effective actions to halt the killing spree.

Earlier this year, as the crime epidemic worsened, law enforcement authorities beefed up their police presence in some of the worst neighborhoods. It’s unclear whether that is having any long-term impact.

For many discouraged, frustrated Chicagoans, the latest law enforcement initiative is 506 lives too late.

Mr. Emanuel’s police action certainly came too late to prevent the shooting death of 15-year-old Porshe Foster last November. The sophomore honor student had just completed basketball practice and was talking with friends in her South Side neighborhood when a hail of bullets were fired into her group, one of them hitting her in the back.

The city’s disastrous economy undoubtedly is a factor in its soaring crime rate. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 473,731 people in the 14-county Chicago metropolitan statistical area (MSA) were unemployed in March — pushing the jobless rate up to nearly 10 percent.

“In addition to the higher rate, the Chicago MSA lost an estimated 12,303 employed residents between February and March 2013, dropping total regional employment to approximately 4.4 million,” according to the World Business Chicago website.

Chicagoans, seeking answers to the senseless killings that have engulfed their city, blame the high level of youth unemployment and their all-too-often dysfunctional school system.

Some pointed to Mr. Obama’s focus on gun violence and gun-control laws when discussing the wave of killings in the city, but add that he is missing one of the core factors behind Chicago’s descent in lawlessness and death.

“If the main topic with the president is only going to be gun control, we are pushing ourselves backwards,” one community organizer bluntly told CNN last month.

“What we need to do is address the root of the problem, the economic violence on a lot of these kids who don’t have jobs or an education,” she said.

Chicago’s steep, jobless economic decline is certainly a factor. The city is overtaxed. Its inefficient, overweight government is drowning in political patronage, corruption and bureaucracy. The larger social problem cries out for no-holds-barred law enforcement, putting criminals behind bars, taking control of the streets and making its neighborhoods safe again.

The role model for that kind of change was seen in the 1990s under then-New York City Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani, a tough, confident, no-nonsense former criminal prosecutor who cleaned up the streets, put the bad guys in prison and made Manhattan livable again.

When Mr. Giuliani became mayor in January 1994, the city was losing on average about 1,700 private-sector jobs a week. The homicide rate had soared to more than 2,000 a year, and more than 1 million New Yorkers were on welfare.

“The city was, in the oft-used word of the day, ungovernable. Unsalvageable. The economy was a wreck. Nothing the city did seemed to work. Social indicators were uniformly bleak. In 1993, for the first time, a majority of births in the city were delivered to unmarried mothers,” wrote Michael Tomasky in New York magazine.

By the end of Mr. Giuliani’s first year in office, the crime rate had plunged by 12 percent, by 16 percent in 1995 and by 16 percent in 1996. Annual homicides, which had skyrocketed to 2,262 in 1992, fell well below 1,000 for the first time in decades in 1996.

He put more cops on the street, cut budgets and taxes, slashed welfare rolls, showed he could not be pushed around by the unions, and improved the schools.

There’s little if any difference between the problems that confronted Mr. Giuliani and those that now face Mr. Emanuel in Chicago. There’s a big difference between the way they approached them, however.

Mr. Giuliani was a reformer who came into office to shake City Hall by its liberal lapels and end years of dysfunctional Democratic policies that fundamentally changed the way New York was run.

Mr. Emanuel, a life-long pol, is no reformer. His party has run and owned City Hall for as long as anyone can remember (since 1931) and it remains a one-party, Democratic-encrusted fiefdom to this day, resistant to needed political and operational changes.

The result is a crime-ridden city that is rapidly decaying inside and out, economically, socially and politically. It is likely to get worse in the years to come.

It’s too bad we can’t send Mr. Giuliani to Chicago, like the paladins of old, to clean up the town, puts its economy back on track, and go after the bad guys with both guns blazing. If asked, I think he’d take the job in a New York minute.

Donald Lambro is a syndicated columnist and contributor to The Washington Times.