- Texas man arrested for powder-letter hoax
- Islamic State opens ‘marriage bureau’ for single jihadists
- Drone almost blocks California firefighting planes
- Tornado rips off roofs, downs trees near Boston
- GOP: Environmental rules keeping agents from accessing border
- John Kerry: Millions displaced by religious fighting in 2013
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia’s gay marriage ban
- White House says Russia ‘losing’ war in Ukraine
- Hamas turns to North Korea for weapons deal, Iran for money
- Syrian casualties surge as jihadis consolidate
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Benghazi facilities should have been closed
Question of the Day
The accountability report by former Ambassador Thomas Pickering and retired chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Mike Mullen was grossly inadequate (“McCain senses Benghazi ‘cover-up,’ wants more Clinton testimony,” Web, May 12). The two men concluded those responsible for the Benghazi murders were low-level State Department staff; they totally ignored the basic problem of why the Benghazi facilities remained open.
The facilities did not meet the standards for protection with adequate perimeter control or the required number of security personnel in the 1980s report of Bobby Ray Inman, a former CIA deputy director. Nor were they adequate according to the Adm. William J. Crowe Jr. report that followed the 1998 bombings of two U.S. embassies in Africa. Adm. Crowe also recommended information sharing and made it clear that the secretary of state must be informed and is responsible for the protection and security of embassy personnel. Why did they not question former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton when she was the one ultimately responsible? Mrs. Clinton has no excuse to justify her failure to do her job; because of her failure four Americans were killed and many injured.
The White House talking points are like all the Democrats’ talking points: all the information they feel you should know, not necessarily all of the facts. The talking points were doctored to deflect criticism on the total failure related to the Benghazi attacks. Mr. Pickering, Adm. Mullen and former Secretary of Defense Leon E. Panetta should have been objective.
MARVIN L. HOOVIS
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
By David Keene
Allowing states to innovate could reduce dependency on bureaucracy
Get Breaking Alerts
- D.C. seeks to stay judge's order allowing gun owners to carry in public
- Hillary Clinton: Forget Obama, George W. Bush made her 'proud to be an American'
- Iraqi Christians rally at White House: 'Obama, Obama, where are you?'
- Illegal immigrants demand representation in White House meetings
- White House defends Kerry failure to broker Middle East cease-fire
- Tennessee Gov. Haslam slams White House for secret dump of illegals in his state
- Border surge puts Obama legacy on immigration at stake
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia's gay marriage ban
- Federal judge rules D.C. ban on handguns in public is unconstitutional
- White House says Russia 'losing' war in Ukraine