- Mexican train carrying 1,300 migrants headed toward U.S. derails
- Secret Service begins regular K-9 patrols around White House
- Pentagon’s human memory-chip program moves forward
- Obama blasts GOP, ignores immigration crisis in Texas speech
- Marine Warfighting Lab tests the Godzilla of amphibious assault vehicles
- Harry Reid: Birth-control ruling the worst Supreme Court decision in 25 years
- Vet suicides ‘horrible human cost’ of VA dysfunction: lawmaker
- First marijuana customer in Spokane says he was fired
- Hagel: ‘Make no mistake,’ ISIL is an ‘imminent’ threat to U.S.
- Armed militia sets up Texas command center to ‘fight for national sovereignty’
Inside the Beltway: And in summation …
Question of the Day
“These are the tactics of the Third World.”
— Sen. Marco Rubio, Florida Republican, commenting on the combined effects of the Benghazi matter, the Justice Department seizure of Associated Press phone records and the IRS probe of conservative groups, before the Senate.
HILLARY + BENGHAZI = NO 2016
The equation of Hillary Rodham Clinton and Benghazi is an uneasy one. Unanswered questions about the terrorist attack eight months ago could prevent the former secretary of state from entering the 2016 presidential race — a palpable fear among Democrats who treasure Mrs. Clinton’s favorable poll numbers and the prospect that former President Bill Clinton could actually end up as “first gentleman.” But wait. If Benghazi compromises Mrs. Clinton’s chances of a White House run, is it the fault of Republicans — or President Obama?
Depends on who’s talking.
“Republicans are trying to bully Hillary Clinton out of running for president by attacking her on Benghazi,” points out Jonathan Easley, who cites former White House strategist David Axelrod’s latest theory. “I really view the Benghazi flare-up right now as throwing a high hard one at Hillary Clinton to try and dissuade her from running for president,” Mr. Axelrod told MSNBC on Wednesday.
It’s not just the Grand Old Party that puts Mrs. Clinton at risk, however.
“After a trifecta of scandals buffeting President Obama Clinton’s close connections with Obama could become politically problematic,” observes National Review analyst Josh Kraushaar.
“Being so closely tied to Obama, she could reap some blowback if any of these scandals metastasize. If they do, Democratic voters may be looking for a fresher face, someone who has spent less time in Washington,” says Mr. Kraushaar, though he notes Mrs. Clinton already “knows something about being embarrassed by a president.”
And what about all that legendary Hillary Rodham Clinton favorability? Does she really have the edge? It appears the Republicans could have something to fret about.
According to the likely 2016 presidential matchups in a Public Policy Polling survey released Wednesday, Mrs. Clinton leads among Democrats with 63 percent of the votes, compared to 13 percent for Vice President Joseph R. Biden, 4 percent for New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo and 3 percent each for Sens. Mark Warner of Virginia and Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts.
In a matchup against Sen. Rand Paul, Mrs. Clinton clinched 51 percent of the vote among all voters, compared to 41 percent for the Kentucky Republican. She wins 47 percent to 44 percent, respectively, when facing off against New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie. Against Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida, Mrs. Clinton wins, 47 percent to 41 percent over the Florida lawmaker.
AN UNLIKELY CRITIC
“There’s a dangerous narrative emerging for President Obama in the wake of these controversies involving Benghazi, the IRS and The Associated Press. It says he’s passive and uninterested in governing. In the face of the cascade of negative stories the president seemed to lack a response. He’s allowed the impression to emerge out there that, as I said last night, he’s a ship with the engine turned off.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- Got justice? 60 percent of Americans say Supreme Court 'gets too mixed up in politics'
- Inside the Beltway: What will become of the Obama legacy?
- Journalists to Obama: Whatever happened to that new 'era of openness'?
- Inside the Beltway: President Obama's script change in the Texas immigration drama
- Pew Research Center: One-in-10 Americans couldn't care less about politics
Latest Blog Entries
- A startling 20 percent of Democratic lawmakers already endorse Hillary Clinton for president
- Hey food police: calling obesity a 'disease' is actually a health risk
- Cheese and an 'enhanced experience': White House goes showbiz on the State of the Union address
- Cruz calls it a 'circus': the State of the Union spectacle begins
- Half of American fans say God and 'supernatural' forces are in play during sports events
TWT Video Picks
Senate majority leader practices politics of personal destruction
- Armed militia sets up Texas command center to 'fight for national sovereignty'
- HUSAIN: The fake caliph of 'The Islamic State'
- IRS employee suspended for pro-Obama activities
- GOP aims to sue Obama first over health care employer mandate
- Amid border crisis, Obama to take 15-day vacation in Martha's Vineyard
- Facebook allows 'Kill Kendall Jones' page, but deletes her game hunting photos
- MARTIN: Iraq without Nouri al-Maliki
- Trial: dengue shot offers some protection
- GOP: Lerner warned IRS employees to hide information from Congress
- Sgt. Andrew Tahmooressi denied freedom by Mexican judge
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq
World Cup's sexiest WAGs
U.S.-Ghana World Cup opener