- Congressman: McAuliffe victory means gun control a winning message
- Clinton aide admits soliciting disgraced D.C. fundraiser; says actions were legal
- Joel Osteen church victimized in $600K theft
- Obama goes shopping at Gap as minimum-wage thanks
- N.J. woman charged after client dies from black-market butt injections
- CIA chief Brennan ‘determined’ to speak out more this year
- Reset? What reset? U.S.-Russia ties at worst since Cold War
- 9/11 terror recruiter released in Syrian prisoner swap
- D.C. elections board gives green light to marijuana legalization initiative
- Elephants can tell difference between human languages: study
Securing border driving House’s immigration efforts
Homeland security committee calls for strict metrics to measure results
Even as the Senate is pushing its massive immigration bill, the House is beginning to move pieces of the puzzle through its committees with a vote Wednesday to force the Obama administration to stiffen border security.
The bill passed the House Homeland Security Committee on a bipartisan voice vote, signaling just how much support there is for securing the border — either independently or as part of a broader immigration deal.
“This is but one component. If you can’t get through this hurdle, you really can’t get to a broader discussion on immigration,” said Rep. Jason Chaffetz, a Utah Republican who sits on the committee. “It is pretty unanimous that you have to address border security. This will put some real metrics to that. Take that out of the hands of the secretary of Homeland Security, and be more objective.”
The bill sets out strict metrics for measuring border security, including drug seizures and the number of illegal immigrants apprehended or deterred from crossing — as well as rules on how to estimate how many people are evading capture.
It also sets deadlines for the administration to submit plans to meet those goals — but the legislation does not authorize any money.
The bill reflects a growing frustration on both sides of the aisle that the Homeland Security Department has no definition for success in controlling the border. The department several years ago scrapped the old definition of miles of the border under “operational control,” but it has offered no replacement.
That led to a heated hearing earlier this year at which members of both parties told department officials they needed to “get in the game” or else risk being the roadblock to passage of an immigration bill.
Wednesday’s bill likely becomes the House’s border security offer in any eventual immigration negotiations with the Senate.
Committee Democrats wanted to include $3 billion to get started on better security.
“Unless we put our money where our mouths are, DHS is bound to fall short,” said Rep. Bennie G. Thompson of Mississippi, the ranking Democrat on the committee. “At a minimum we should provide the $3 billion in new money that Secretary [Janet A.] Napolitano acknowledges she needs to achieve operational control.”
But Republicans said they wanted to get a look at the plan before they dole the money out.
“I don’t want to throw money at this department on an ad hoc basis because frankly I don’t trust them,” said Chairman Michael T. McCaul, Texas Republican.
The 18-page bill is the first major immigration measure to clear a congressional committee this year, and it underscores the different approaches to the issue.
The Senate Judiciary Committee is working on a massive 867-page bill that would spend more on border security while rewriting the legal immigration system and granting legal status to illegal immigrants. Senators have held two days of committee votes and return to work Thursday.
Meanwhile, the House Judiciary Committee will work Thursday on two smaller bills — one that would impose a nationwide electronic worker verification system and another that would create a guest-worker program for agriculture workers.
“I feel very confident we can pass this bill out of the House, and that puts us in play in a conference situation,” he said. “I think we’re all in agreement that more has to be done, that’s why we have this bill.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Stephen Dinan can be reached at email@example.com.
- House panel report concludes that Lerner lied to Congress on IRS targeting
- Congress bans taxpayer funding for political conventions
- Intelligence chairwoman accuses CIA of intimidation, snooping on Congress
- CPAC 2014: Poll shows GOP discontent, Congress frustration
- U.S. has lost track of tens of thousands of foreign students who came study to then took jobs
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
An America drowning in red ink is the land of the free no more
- Inside the Beltway: A new interest in Rahm Emanuel for 2016?
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
- David Jolly wins in Florida, GOP keeps swing district seat
- 80 people publicly executed across North Korea for films, Bibles
- CARNES: Kissinger's flawed and offensive analysis of Ukraine
- Liam Neeson tells NYC mayor to 'man up' in horse carriage fight
- Brennan: Russia 'absolutely' could invade eastern Ukraine
- Joel Osteen church victimized in $600K theft
Pope Francis meets his 'mini-me'
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Winter storm hits states — again