- House and Senate negotiators reach two-year budget deal
- Congress seeks ban on in-flight calls
- Michelle Malkin’s Twitchy site sold to owners of Townhall, HotAir: report
- GM’s Barra to be first woman to run top American carmaker
- China: Poisonous smog is a military asset, if you think about it
- Texas woman admits to sending ricin to Obama
- Ron Paul on son Rand: ‘I think he probably will’ run for president
- Cold War heats up again in the Arctic: Russian airfield reactivated after 20 years
- 6-year-old boy suspended for sexual harassment over kiss
- Voters deciding Mass. congressional contest
Tea party group targeted by IRS suspected opposition research for Obama campaign
When the chairman of one of the tea party groups targeted by the IRS for special scrutiny saw the agency’s questions, his first thought was that the queries were so outrageous that the Obama administration was engaging in campaign opposition research.
Tom Zawistowski, head of the Portage County Tea Party in Ohio, said when his group applied to the Internal Revenue Service for tax-exempt status, it was asked to print out every posting it ever made on its Facebook page and to turn over the names of every person who spoke at its meetings, along with topics, transcripts and handout materials.
“I’ll tell you flat-out, I got the letter and the first thing I thought was, ‘This is opposition research. This doesn’t have anything to do with tax status, it doesn’t even have anything to do with political activity,” he said.
“Look at all the questions — they never ask us anything about political activity. They never say, ‘Did you give money to a candidate or party?’” he said.
“So when I got it, I was thinking this is opposition research. They’re coming after us in Ohio this year and they want to know how many people I have, who I have.”
The Treasury inspector general for tax administration released an audit Tuesday that found the IRS gave special scrutiny to applications from groups that had “tea party” or “patriot” or “9/12” in their names — a move that lawmakers on both sides of the aisle say appeared to chill First Amendment rights.
President Obama announced Wednesday night that the acting head of the IRS had resigned as a result of the scandal.
The IRS said it wasn’t motivated by politics but rather by the flood of applications from groups that formed after the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision, which opened up avenues for interest groups to have a voice in political debates — though they were still generally barred from donating directly to candidates for office.
Agency officials have said the extra scrutiny was their way of streamlining the processing of the flood of applications.
But Cleta Mitchell, a lawyer who represents some of the organizations that were targeted, said that explanation makes no sense.
“Streamline? So you streamline by sending people requests and they have to submit 400 or 500 pages of stuff? That’s streamlining?” she said.
She said the problem isn’t just the intrusive questions, but also the delay in approving the applications. Groups that applied in 2009 and 2010 are still awaiting certificates showing their tax-exempt status, she said.
“This isn’t in the past tense. This is all still going on,” she said.
One of her organizations was asked 29 questions, including demands to provide: copies of bylaws; a resume for each organization officer; family relationships between officers; minutes of every board meeting; copies of all solicitations for money; a list of “all issues that are important to your organization” and their positions on them; a total number of volunteers and how they are used; and the amount of time spent on each activity.
Some organizations have given up and withdrawn their applications, while others said they opted not to apply after hearing about the scrutiny.
“There were already rumors in the mill to beware,” said John Hull, chairman of the Summerville 9-12 Project in South Carolina, which is affiliated with the national Tea Party Patriots.
He said his group talked about the legitimacy that came with being tax-exempt, but members decided they didn’t want the hassle or the potential harassment.
“We don’t believe it’s in our best interest to put a bull’s-eye on our back,” he said.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Stephen Dinan can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Federal deficit shrinks 20 percent in fiscal 2014
- Wind farms: Interior Department sacrifices eagle protection for alternative energy
- Activists urge Obama to go rogue, sidestep Congress
- Bipartisan House votes against 'patent trolls' who file lawsuits against innovators
- Bipartisan House votes to stop patent 'trolls'
Latest Blog Entries
By Donald Lambro
Growth spikes are little more than trend-free anomalies
- Harry Reid's visa pressure cooker
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
- Chinese man fed up with his girlfriend's shopping jumps to his death
- FITTON: A closer look at the Benghazi lie
- CARSON: Why did the founders give us the Second Amendment?
- American bourbon now better than Scottish whiskey: U.K.-born expert
- Somber duty: U.S. presidents in hot demand at Mandela's memorial
- Obama shakes hands with Cuba's Raul Castro at Nelson Mandela's funeral
- KOENIG: Should Congress hike your taxes ... or, instead, slash spending?
- Christmas secularists get 6-foot beer-can Festivus pole at Florida Statehouse
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things.
The “Silver Tsunami” created by aging Baby Boomers is hitting America. Let’s explore how we adjust to it, enjoy it and defy negative expectations about age.
Find the latest news and happening that effect those in the Washington D.C., Northern Virginia and Maryland Metro region.
Global economy, the civilizing power of markets and public morals.
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow