- ‘Gay Jeans’ that fade into rainbow-colored denim created
- Divided court strikes down big porn award
- Jimmy Carter: Don’t hurt Russian people with sanctions
- Oldest ex-MLB player dies in Cuba, 2 days shy of 103rd birthday
- ‘Top Gun’ for drones: Squadrons of carrier-based killers have Navy’s approval
- Bill Clinton to endorse Charlie Rangel for re-election
- Pfc. Bradley Manning is now Pfc. Chelsea Manning: Court says so
- Secret base U.S. special forces used to train Libyans now under terrorist control: report
- 9th suspect in N.C. kidnapping turns self in to FBI
- L.A. sheriff admits to testing flyover spy program without notifying residents
TYRRELL: Is it 2016 yet?
Gaffe-ridden White House is good for laughs, but not for leadership
It has happened again. Our gaffe-prone president has filed another blunder on his presidential record. At the dedication of George W. Bush’s presidential library, he invoked history with his usual mastery of detail. He placed President John F. Kennedy in Air Force One, “on the flight back from Russia, after negotiating with Nikita Khrushchev at the height of the Cold War.”
Actually, the flight was returning from Vienna, not Russia, and not much “negotiating” had been done. Truth be known, it was one of the lowest points in JFK’s presidency. As Kennedy himself recalled, “[Khrushchev] treated me like a little boy.” And more: “Worst thing in my life. He savaged me,” said our 35th president. At least President Obama did not claim anyone at the Kennedy-Khrushchev summit spoke “Austrian.” That was the language our learned president attributed to the citizens of Vienna back on April 6, 2009. No philologist has ever heard of it.
As I have noted before, Mr. Obama will be remembered as America’s gaffable president. He nicely complements Joseph R. Biden Jr., America’s gaffable vice president. Remember back at inauguration time when Joe addressed the Iowa State Society Inauguration Ball: “I’m proud to be president of the United States.” By now, there have been scores of happy blunders committed by both of these public servants.
I am relatively certain that I am the first to say this in a public forum: Mr. Obama and Mr. Biden are the most gaffe-prone leaders of a presidential administration in modern times. I cannot think of any conceivable melange of presidents and vice presidents in recent history who could surpass these two in cloddishness — not Warren G. Harding and Jimmy Carter, not Dan Quayle and Al Gore, not Laurel and Hardy. No, strike that last pair. They never ran for high office. Yet, were they today upright and with all their vital organs functioning, they might have presented a formidable duo, particularly if one — say, Stan Laurel — could have presented himself as suffering a trendy modern affliction such as gender ambiguity, and the other — the portly Oliver Hardy — could have claimed an eating disorder.
That seems to be how Mr. Obama and Mr. Biden got re-elected. They had a miserable record, most notably in economics, but they segmented the population. They captured the vote of the unmarried women, who are not very happy. They won the vote of the young people, who will be paying for my entitlements for years to come, and the entitlements of the poor and the not-so-poor. Most minorities voted for them. These voters along with the Democratic majority — often referred to in this column as the moron vote — beat a Republican ticket with the demonstrated skill to right the economy and to guide the country through tricky foreign-policy challenges, challenges that the Obama-Biden duo have yet to meet.
So our gaffable president and vice president will flounder along for the rest of their terms, and Americans will hope and pray for the best. In the meantime, a news story is beginning to appear with telling regularity. It is the story that speculates on whom the Republicans and Democrats will nominate to represent them in 2016.
Starting around inauguration time, Politico and The Wall Street Journal speculated on Mr. Biden’s candidacy — ha, ha, ha. Also there were reports in The Washington Post, The Washington Times and The New York Times that Hillary Rodham Clinton’s candidacy was practically invincible. Recall, if you will, 2008 when her candidacy was, with tedious regularity, referred to as “inevitable.” Now she has added Benghazi, Libya, to her record as the most unpopular and scandal-tainted first lady in history. That, with her age and questionable health, makes her candidacy very dubious. Then there are stories speculating on the Republicans. There is Chris Christie, Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, Marco Rubio and Paul Ryan. Now there is Jeb Bush.
All of these stories may be fanciful, or they may be based on hard facts, but one thing is certain. Unless you are an angry woman, a clueless young person or a representative of the moron vote, you have moved on from the election of 2012 and dearly want someone to lead us out of the soup.
R. Emmett Tyrrell Jr. is editor in chief of the American Spectator and adjunct scholar at the Hudson Institute.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
TWT Video Picks
By Andrew P. Napolitano
Obama's veil of secrecy is pierced
Get Breaking Alerts
- Pentagon plans to replace flight crews with 'full-time' robots
- 'Top Gun' for drones: Squadrons of carrier-based killers have Navy's approval
- Kansas will nullify local regulation of guns
- Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy hailed as patriot, ripped as lawless deadbeat
- CARSON: When government looks more like foe than friend
- America is an oligarchy, not a democracy or republic, university study finds
- Washington Redskins' 2014 schedule opens with Texans
- Texas is next! AG warns BLM wants 90,000 acres after Bundy ranch standoff
- Georgia governor signs bill expanding gun rights
- Opposition rising to Colorado gun control laws