- Chicken pox outbreak puts illegal immigrant facility on lockdown
- Obama to Republicans: ‘Stop just hatin’ all the time’
- U.S. chemical sites vulnerable despite millions spent on security: Congress
- Driverless cars to hit the British streets by 2015
- GOP presses to scrap IRS commissioner position — but put in panel
- New bill would make sure women in military can get free birth control
- Trafficking bust reveals worries over missing kids; minors as young as 11 found
- Catholic League slams Obama: ‘Do Christian lives mean so little to you?’
- National laboratory cancels ‘Southern Accent Reduction’ classes after outcry
- U.S. woman with Ebola is stable, improving, son says
BOOK REVIEW: ‘Europe’
Question of the Day
EUROPE: THE STRUGGLE FOR SUPREMACY FROM 1453 TO THE PRESENT
By Brendan Simms
Basic Books, $35, 690 pages
In his sweeping, intelligent and enormously ambitious book, British historian Brendan Simms argues that whoever controls Central Europe can dominate the world.
The University of Cambridge professor begins his book with 1453, the year that saw the collapse of the Byzantine Empire and the Ottoman invasion of Europe. These events resulted in the Holy Roman Empire defending Christian European values against Muslim religion and dominance.
Over time, the Ottoman Empire managed to penetrate Europe to the outskirts of Vienna, where it was defeated in 1683 by Polish, Austrian and German forces.
During the past two centuries, the key players in the struggle for Europe stretched from Napoleon Bonaparte of France and Otto Bismarck of Imperial Germany to Adolf Hitler of the Third Reich as well as Josef Stalin of the Soviet Union, and Franklin D. Roosevelt, Harry S. Truman and Ronald Reagan of the United States. One might add Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev to the list — though he sought not to dominate Europe, only to save an empire and his nation. He struck out on both.
This united Germany was ideologically dominated by Frederick II of Prussia (ruling from 1740 to 1786), who is supposed to have said that he wanted Prussia to become “not a country with an army, but an army with a country.”
Former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, a refugee from the Third Reich, described the Kaiser’s Germany as “too big for Europe, but too small for the world.” With a population of some 41 million people, Germany was the largest nation on the Continent after czarist Russia, which had 77 million subjects but was vastly inferior in industrial, military and scientific achievements.
As the prominent historian Istvan Deak observed, “While the Habsburg dynasty’s Austria-Hungary disappeared from the face of the earth, and the multinational Ottoman Empire was not quite replaced by a much smaller and nationalistic Turkish Republic, both Germany and Russia emerged from the ruins under the dictators Hitler and Stalin. The two were far for more ruthless and far more efficient than the monarchies had been. The only absolute winners of World War I were the United States and Japan; their rivalry would later form a major part of World War II.”
America had no alternative but to enter a world war again after the Japanese Empire struck Pearl Harbor on Dec. 7, 1941. Hitler’s rash declaration of war against the United States made things easier for Roosevelt to fight in Europe as well.
Mr. Simms researched his book meticulously, with much of his material coming from German archives. One minor error was his assertion that Adm. Miklos Horthy, the governor of Hungary between the two world wars, was replaced “by energetic German action in December 1944.” In fact, Horthy was ousted by the Germans in October 1944 after he made an abortive bid to end the war with the Russians.
Germany, occupied and divided by the Western powers and the Soviets after World War II, became the focus of rivalry.
But postwar Germany also was a driving force of European integration that led to the collapse of the Berlin Wall, the expansion of NATO and the European Union. The key for German and European stability was America’s engagement on the Continent.
The book went to press during a period of what Mr. Simms calls “an exceptional European uncertainty.”
“Nobody knows whether the Franco-German-led Eurozone will survive the onslaught of the markets or whether it will be pulverized by the outside world,” he writes.
If not, Europe could fragment into its component parts, only to be dominated again by Germany.
Frank T. Csongos was a longtime reporter, editor and news executive with United Press International and Radio Free Europe-Radio Liberty.
TWT Video Picks
Get Breaking Alerts
- Geraldo Rivera: Matt Drudge 'doing his best to stir up a civil war'
- Lois Lerner hated conservatives, new emails show
- Catholic League slams Obama: 'Do Christian lives mean so little to you?'
- CARSON: Rudderless U.S. foreign policy
- Patent workers paid to exercise, shop, do chores: report
- Fla. mom arrested for allowing 7-year-old son to walk to park alone
- Obama thanks Muslims for 'building the very fabric of our nation'
- Obama mum on where illegal immigrant children are sheltered
- National laboratory cancels 'Southern Accent Reduction' classes after outcry
- Federal judge grants 90-day stay in D.C. gun case