- GOP: Environmental rules keeping agents from accessing border
- John Kerry: Millions displaced by religious fighting in 2013
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia’s gay marriage ban
- White House says Russia ‘losing’ war in Ukraine
- Hamas turns to North Korea for weapons deal, Iran for money
- Syrian casualties surge as jihadis consolidate
- U.N. rights chief: Flight MH17 downing possible war crime
- Attack on park in Gaza war kills 10, mostly children
- Calif. protesters to block Israel-owned ships at Port of Oakland
- Obama to give Africa $38M, but tells young leaders: Stop ‘making excuses’ for economy
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Safeguard against tyranny
Question of the Day
Some historians whisper that we are more divided now than we were on the eve of the Civil War, while certain high officers in the executive branch of the federal government are engaged in unabashed assault on our Constitution.
Feeling outnumbered? You’re in good company. The Founders felt the same way. Take heart, friends. Our Constitution was written precisely to protect the rights of a minority from the tyranny of the majority. They knew the chaos and failures of Greek models; they wisely selected their best features to form an imperfect (but exemplary) government.
That’s why our Founding Fathers constructed not a true democracy, but rather a constitutional republic. Our Constitution’s framers were very wise. They recognized that any person seeking to enslave the free citizens of the new republic must first disarm them of effective weaponry. After all, the first skirmish of the Revolution was fought because the British were coming to confiscate weapons and powder in the Lexington magazine.
The Second Amendment was written to safeguard against tyranny — not to assure hunting rights or be against any particular polity. Anyone who favors a “progressive socialist” government should be as vehemently opposed to infringement of their right to bear arms as those who might favor government by military junta.
We’re drawn into endless debate over magazine capacity, background checks and loopholes, when the real question is how much will we will give up and what losses we will tolerate. There are, however, a few certainties based on historical precedent: Registration means ultimate confiscation, and nothing surrendered will ever be “enough.”
Only with reservations do we consent to be governed by our Constitution, not ruled by imperial edict. If no one else will defend the Constitution, “we the people” must do so. It’s ours to defend — or lose.
GEORGE R. GREENE
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
By Mark Davis
The nation founders, the Lone Star State thrives
Get Breaking Alerts
- Hillary Clinton: Forget Obama, George W. Bush made her 'proud to be an American'
- Illegal immigrants demand representation in White House meetings
- D.C. police chief orders officers not to arrest legal gun owners carrying weapons in public
- Tennessee Gov. Haslam slams White House for secret dump of illegals in his state
- CURL: Obama, staffers not even pretending any more
- Babson College, BYU win top spots in Money magazine's college rankings
- D.C. seeks stay in order striking down ban on handguns in public
- Family of Marine killed in Afghanistan pushes back against cover-up
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Washington Times strikes content and marketing partnership with Redskins