- Blame Bush: 5 years later, that’s still the mantra, pollsters find
- Dutch prostitutes demand same retirement benefits as soccer stars
- John McCain to Harry Reid: I’ll ‘kick the crap’ out of you
- Dogs that talk: Researchers seek $10K for ‘No More Woof’ technology
- 1,000 firefighters called to battle stubborn Big Sur wildfire
- Black Friday brouhaha: Millions of Target shoppers hit by credit card theft
- Britain orders airplane to rescue citizens from violent South Sudan
- Mega Millions winner emerges as Georgia mom, in ‘disbelief’
- ‘Duck Dynasty’ Phil Robertson suspended ‘indefinitely’ for gay quip
- John Podesta eats crow: ‘I apologize to Speaker Boehner’
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Free speech isn’t harassment
Question of the Day
The Washington Times rightly criticizes the Obama administration for demanding unconstitutional college speech codes (“Repealing free speech,” Comment & Analysis, May 17). The Department of Education wrongly claims that any “unwelcome” speech about sexual topics is “sexual harassment” — even if it does not offend an “objectively reasonable person.”
As a former Department of Education lawyer, I am shocked by this claim. It contradicts both the Supreme Court’s Davis decision defining sexual harassment in the educational setting and federal court rulings striking down campus harassment codes that restrict speech about sexual issues.
The Supreme Court emphasized that sexual speech must be “objectively offensive” and “severe” to constitute sexual harassment under Title IX. In Dambrot v. Central Michigan University (1995), a federal appeals court struck down a harassment code as unconstitutionally vague because it defined harassment in “subjective” terms. In DeJohn v. Temple University (2008), an appeals court declared a sexual-harassment policy unconstitutional because it reached beyond speech that was “objectively” harmful, and it banned even speech that did not unreasonably interfere with an education.
Competitive Enterprise Institute
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
By Andrew P. Napolitano
Fourth Amendment says Obama is not at liberty to collect metadata
Get Breaking Alerts
- Gov't wasted $30 billion on 'pillownauts,' crystal goblets -- buying human urine!
- Half of America strips religion from Christmas
- Obamacare 'pajamas boy' gets roundly mocked
- Duck Dynasty Phil Robertson suspended indefinitely for gay quip
- In court filing, NCAA denies legal duty to protect athletes
- Bill Gates: The Secret Santa disguised as a 'friendly fellow' on Reddit
- U.S. Army mulls wiping out memory of Robert E. Lee, 'Stonewall' Jackson
- Border Patrol helps smuggle illegal immigrant children into the U.S.
- NAPOLITANO: NSA spies pick up interference from the Constitution
- John McCain to Harry Reid: Ill kick the crap out of you