- ‘Operation Normandy’ set to send 3,500 volunteers to border to ‘stop an invasion’
- Netanyahu’s spokesman: Safe to fly to Israel
- Oregon vandals smear cars with doughnuts, pastries, chocolate bars
- Obama’s ‘Katrina moment’ leaves his favorability factor at 42 percent
- Feds tout nearly 200 arrests, $625K in seized cash in Texas border crackdown
- Joy Behar: Sarah Palin should be ‘turning letters over on some game show’
- Rhino poacher in South Africa sentenced to 77 years in jail
- John Kerry defies FAA and flies to Israel to talk peace
- Beretta leaves Maryland over gun laws, heads for Tennessee
- Neal Boortz defends Hillary Clinton for representing child rapist
Obama’s drone speech welcomed by Pakistan, Yemen and the U.N.
Question of the Day
President Obama’s pledge to scale back lethal drone strikes against suspected terrorists drew praise in Pakistan and Yemen, where almost all of the strikes take place — and from the U.N. official investigating U.S. targeted killing.
U.N. Special Rapporteur on Counter-Terrorism and Human Rights Ben Emmerson said the speech should be welcomed as “a declaration that the U.S. war with al Qaeda and its associated forces is coming to an end.”
In Pakistan Friday, a statement from the foreign ministry reiterated Islamabad’s opposition to the drone program, but said the newly elected government welcomed Mr. Obama’s acknowledgement that “force alone cannot make us safer.”
It was “Pakistan’s long-standing stance that a comprehensive strategy was acquired to address the root causes that foster terrorism and extremism,” the statement said.
U.S. strikes by remotely piloted drone aircraft in Pakistan’s lawless and remote tribal belt along the Afghan border have long been unpopular in that country, where anti-Americanism and Islamic extremism are rife, and where many believe the strikes have killed thousands of innocent bystanders, although the likely civilian death toll is much lower.
The New America Foundation think tank maintains a database of the strikes, combining reports in major news media that rely on local officials and eyewitness accounts. According to their figures, the CIA and the U.S. military have carried out 416 drone strikes in Pakistan and Yemen, resulting in 3,364 estimated deaths, including extremists and civilians.
Strikes in Pakistan spiked in 2010 under Obama to 122. But the rate has dropped to 12 so far this year. The CIA and the military have carried out some 69 strikes in Yemen, with the Yemeni government’s permission.
Nawaz Sharif, the newly minted Pakistani prime minister, spoke out against the drone strikes during the recent election campaign, and the country’s parliament has called for an end to the program, which is regarded by many as illegal under international law and an insult to Pakistan’s national sovereignty.
Mr. Obama, in his speech Thursday at the National Defense University said he would continue the program, but published new guidelines which he said would govern who could be targeted and when strikes could be carried out. The target must present an “imminent and continuing” threat to Americans, and there must be “near certainty” that there will be no civilian casualties.
The foreign ministry statement said Islamabad “has consistently maintained that the drone strikes are counter-productive, entail loss of innocent civilian lives, have human rights and humanitarian implications and violate the principles of national sovereignty, territorial integrity and international law.”
In his speech, Mr. Obama acknowledged that the strikes had damaged relations with Pakistan, and he praised the sacrifices of the country’s security forces, several thousands of whom have been killed in clashes with extremists and terror attacks.
“We appreciate President Obama’s acknowledgement and recognition of the sacrifices made by Pakistan,” said the foreign ministry.
Earlier this year, Pakistani officials told Mr. Emmerson, the UN rapporteur, that the civilian government had never approved the program. But Mr. Emmerson, a British barrister, said recently in Washington he could not rule out the possibility that military or intelligence officials in Islamabad had tacitly given approval to their U.S. counterparts.
On Friday, Mr. Emmerson called the president’s speech “historic.”
It should “be welcomed as a highly significant step towards greater transparency and accountability; and as a declaration that the US war with al Qaeda and its associated forces is coming to an end,” he said in a statement.
Mr. Obama, he said had “set out more clearly and more authoritatively than ever before the administration’s legal justifications for targeted killing, and the constraints that it operates under,” which had “dispose[d] of a number of myths, including the suggestion that the U.S. is entitled to regard all military-aged males as combatants, and therefore as legitimate targets.”
Mr. Emmerson said he would be “engaging with senior Administration officials in Washington over the coming days and weeks in an effort to put some flesh on the bones” of the president’s speech.
He also welcomed the president’s new push to close the Guantanamo Bay detention center in Cuba. Mr. Obama said he was lifting a ban on transferring approved Yemeni detainees to their home country. The end of that ban is key to any effort to empty the center, given that 30 of the 56 prisoners eligible for transfer are Yemeni, according to the Associated Press. There are 166 detainees at Guantanamo Bay.
An adviser to Yemen’s prime minister, Rageh Badi, praised Obama’s decision to lift the ban as a “welcome step” that would improve relations between the two countries, AP reported.
“This is a responsible speech, especially about the closure of the detention center, which has been an insult to the U.S. more than to any other country,” said Mr. Badi.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Shaun Waterman is an award-winning reporter for The Washington Times, covering foreign affairs, defense and cybersecurity. He was a senior editor and correspondent for United Press International for nearly a decade, and has covered the Department of Homeland Security since 2003. His reporting on the Sept. 11 Commission and the tortuous process by which some of its recommendations finally became ...
- Senator's memo shows Iran links in Homeland Security's troubled immigration program
- Help wanted: Homeland Security plagued by vacancies at the top
- Dems back bill to fix problems in investor visa program
- Democrats proceed with Mayorkas vote despite pending investigation
- NSA monitored 'World of Warcraft' players
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Retailer pays a price for getting too close to Obama
- CARSON: Costco and the perils of mixing politics and business
- David Perdue defeats Jack Kingston in Georgia Republican Senate primary runoff
- IRS seeks help destroying another 3,200 computer hard drives
- Beretta moving to Tennessee over Maryland gun laws
- D.C. appeals panel deals big blow to Obamacare subsidies
- 'Straight White Guy Festival' supposedly set for Ohio park
- HURT: The cost of 'free' water in Detroit
- EDITORIAL: Obamacare in intensive care
- Pentagon team dispatched to Ukraine amid crisis with Russia
- Contrasting judgments on Obama's health care hours apart; appeals court calls subsidies unlawful
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq