- Strong quake hits Japan, triggering tsunami
- Sniper heaven: Pentagon’s self-guided bullets leave enemies nowhere to hide
- Violent gang taking advantage of immigration crisis, using border as recruiting hub
- Medicaid enrollment continues to soar under Obamacare, administration says
- Michelle Obama to Latinos: ‘We cannot afford to wait on Congress’ for immigration
- White House urges GOP to act ‘urgently’ on $3.7 billion request for illegal immigrants
- Politicians, criminals using ‘right-to-be-forgotten’ law EU courts forced upon Google
- Combat fatigue: elite special forces troops are ‘fraying,’ Gen. Joseph Votel warns
- German foreign minister to meet Kerry to discuss spying claims
- Florida police spokesman tells citizens: ‘Get yourself some firearms’
GHEI: The price of eroding trust
As suspicion advances, prosperity retreats
Question of the Day
In the latest act of the unfolding Internal Revenue Service scandal, Lois Lerner, the head of the agency’s tax-exempt organizations office, faced with allegations of improper targeting of conservative groups, invoked the Fifth Amendment’s protection against self-incrimination. The entire episode is swiftly degenerating into a bipartisan battle for political advantage.
The justification that the IRS has long been used by those in political power against their opponents is symptomatic of the larger problem in the United States. Years of redistributionist rhetoric, bailouts to firms who should have been responsible for the risks they took, subsidies flowing to the politically connected, and the replacement of flexible social norms by rigid top-down regulations are causing erosion of trust and whittling of social capital; that is, norms and institutions that allow peaceful cooperation and exchange to take place. Eventually, this decline in trust in both our public institutions and civil society will be reflected in slower economic growth and a society that is less prosperous than it could have been.
According to the Legatum Institute, the United States dropped from 10th to 12th in the institute’s Prosperity Index from 2009 to 2012, even as the world as a whole grew more prosperous. The broad-based Prosperity Index includes measures for personal freedom, social capital, governance, and entrepreneurship and opportunity. The United States fell one place for governance, two for social capital, a depressing four for personal freedom, and a shocking eight in entrepreneurship and opportunity in those four years. The economy measure fell by seven places in one year alone between 2011 and 2012. Worse, as the Legatum Institute’s site explains, the decline in the entrepreneurship and opportunity measure is explained to some extent by “a decline in citizens’ perception that working hard gets you ahead.”
This is long-term bad news, with effects that will persist for far longer than the various scandals currently swirling around Washington. Trust in other people, in private institutions and in public institutions is critical to economic growth, and trust is what we are losing. The slow erosion of civil society ultimately is the greater danger we need to address lest we get caught in a stagnation trap.
In a 2001 study, Claremont University economist Paul Zak and World Bank economist Stephen Knack examined 37 countries and found that higher levels of interpersonal trust were associated with higher rates of growth. As Mr. Knack explains, “Interpersonal trust can complement or substitute for formal property rights, reducing transactions costs and encouraging investment,” with a concomitant positive impact on growth.
In addition to interpersonal trust, such as trust between family members, trust matters at the firm level, and even at the macro level of the society or nation. There are at least three ways in which higher trust can encourage economic growth. Conversely, lower trust acts as a drag on growth.
Higher levels of trust reduce transaction costs. The higher the trust level, the lower the need for monitoring and enforcement contracts. People who trust each other are likely to spend fewer resources in litigation. According to the Legatum Institute, lower levels of trust are associated with higher levels of regulation. Lower trust adds the cost of regulatory compliance as an additional drag on growth. Second, as Nobel laureate Elinor Ostrom explained, high-trust societies are more likely to solve problems caused by free riders or external costs, such as overfishing, because people are more willing to cooperate. They are also less likely to take advantage of public programs designed to help the needy. As trust erodes, more people are likely to game the system. This results in demands for more monitoring, which is costly and further drags down growth.
Third, high-trust societies create an environment that is more conducive to innovation. If you can focus your energy and time on creating new products instead of worrying whether your partner is robbing you, or whether the government is going to expropriate your new invention, you are going to be more productive, and the innovation is going to contribute to economic growth. Erosion in trust reverses this virtuous cycle. Low-trust societies tend to view entrepreneurship with hostility and in need of regulation, further aggravating the problem.
Trust in one other and in our institutions can be lost all too easily. We seem to be heading down that path already. If we wish to prevent the loss of potential innovation and growth, and improvements in standards of living, we need to resist behavior that degrades trust, both in public institutions and civil society as a whole.
Nita Ghei is policy research editor at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University.
TWT Video Picks
By Robert N. Tracci
Congress must use its appropriations power to secure the border
Get Breaking Alerts
- Violent gang MS-13 taking advantage of immigration crisis, using border as recruiting hub
- Pentagon's self-guided bullets leave enemies nowhere to hide
- Michelle Obama to Latinos: 'We cannot afford to wait on Congress' for immigration
- A 'new Cold War': China's top paper warns of 'slippery slope' towards conflict with U.S.
- Armed militia sets up Texas command center to 'fight for national sovereignty'
- DOJ investigates Norfolk parade float critical of Obama
- 'Be a leader' Perry tells Obama to confront border crisis
- Eric Holder on Palin: 'She wasn't a particularly good vice presidential candidate'
- Hamas orders civilians to die in Israeli airstrikes
- NASCAR TV contract back to NBC in 2015, leaving ESPN, Turner Sports
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: How many boondoggles to break the bank?
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: The problem is unenforced borders
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Where are condolences for Jewish teens' deaths?
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama welcomes illegals, ignores Americans
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama has no intention of repatriating illegals