- Obama downplays IRS scandal, blames Obamacare rollout on ‘outdated’ agencies
- Pregnancies decline overall, up among older women
- Pentagon plans to destroy Syrian chemical arms on ship at sea
- Paris Metro issues ‘politeness manual’ to improve passengers’ behavior
- Justin Bieber, crew detained at Australian airport in drug search
- Lee Rigby trial: Muslim who machete-hacked soldier calls it ‘humane’ kill
- GM ending Chevy sales in Europe to focus on Opel and Vauxhall
- Putin’s diplomats to U.S. busted for living high life off $1.5M bilked from Medicaid
- Happy Meal: Couple goes to McDonald’s, leaves with bag packed with cash
- Boehner: It took me 3 to 4 hours to sign up for Obamacare
Obama against U.S. troops in Syria
In his third attempt in four days to explain his position on chemical weapon attacks in Syria, President Obama Friday night all but ruled out sending U.S. troops to fight in the civil war.
"I do not foresee a scenario in which boots on the ground in Syria, American boots on the ground in Syria, would not only be good for America, but also would be good for Syria," Mr. Obama said at a news conference in San Jose, Costa Rica, where he is attending an international summit.
The president said when he talks with other leaders in the Middle East who want to see Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad toppled, "they agree with that assessment" about keeping U.S. troops out of the conflict.
Mr. Obama put himself in the awkward position of having to specify his military view after leaving the impression earlier in the news conference that he might consider sending American troops to Damascus.
In answering a reporter's question about how long he was willing to wait to react to reports of chemical weapons being used in Syria, Mr. Obama at first said his decision as commander-in-chief would be based on "facts on the ground" and U.S. national security interests.
Moments later, he came back to the issue, saying "I didn't want anybody to extrapolate from" his answer that he considers sending U.S. troops to Syria a viable option.
"As a general rule, I don't rule things out as commander-in-chief because circumstances change and you want to make sure that I always have the full power of the United States at our disposal to meet American national security interests," Mr. Obama said. "So I just wanted to make sure that my omission there did not turn into a story."
It was Mr. Obama's latest attempt to explain how he intends to respond to the chemical-weapons reports, which were raised by U.S. intelligence agencies last week. The president has said he considers the use of chemical weapons to cross "red line" that he wouldn't tolerate. But he has resisted spelling out what steps he would take to stop such attacks.
Some U.S. lawmakers have called for Mr. Obama to impose a no-fly zone over Syria. The president has been calling in recent days for the international community to verify the use of chemical weapons, and administration officials have said they are also considering sending arms to some Syrian rebel groups.
Asked how long he was willing to wait to verify reports of chemical weapons, Mr. Obama responded Friday night, "We're not waiting. We're not standing by."
"We are the largest humanitarian donor, the largest contributor of non-lethal aid to opposition," he said. "We are working to apply every pressure point that we can on Syria, working with our international partners."
Mr. Obama said he wants to see "strong evidence" of chemical weapons so he can "present that to the international community."
"We will stay on this," he said. "This is not just an American problem, this is a world problem."
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Dave Boyer is a White House correspondent for The Washington Times. A native of Allentown, Pa., Boyer worked for the Philadelphia Inquirer from 2002 to 2011 and also has covered Congress for the Times. He is a graduate of Penn State University. Boyer can be reached at email@example.com.
- Obama downplays IRS scandal, blames Obamacare rollout on 'outdated' agencies
- Biden leaves with no concessions from China, heads next to South Korea
- Biden in Beijing: From diplomat to tourist on taxpayer dime
- Susan Rice slams Russia, China on human rights
- Joe Biden meets Xi Jinping in China to try to defuse tensions on air defense zone
Latest Blog Entries
Why such hatred toward America's freedom of religion?
- 'Hunger Games' delivers Obama's message on income inequality: liberal group
- Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.
- Russian diplomats busted bilking $1.5 million from Medicaid
- Democratic infighting erupts over 'we can have it all' fantasy on entitlements
- NAPOLITANO: Pope Francis should be saving souls, not pocketbooks
- Hack attack: 2 million Facebook, Twitter passwords stolen
- Obama returns to class warfare as poll numbers plunge
- CARSON: Getting to the top by starting at the bottom
- Activists encourage Obama to circumvent Congress, use more executive authority
- Obama lived with Uncle Onyango Obama in the 1980s, White House admits
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things.
Understanding economic events with a free market explanation
John Wood illustrates a new American politics, and the path to get there.
Interviews and show reviews from the Los Angeles punk scene past and present. Los Angeles has always been rich in punk rock talent since punk rock was born.
White House pets gone wild!