- House passes VA reform compromise
- Obama admin to blame for HealthCare.gov woes, $840M cost: GAO
- Al Gore’s climate-changers at EPA hearings foiled by cool temperatures
- Army’s 3-D printed bombs will create ‘a whole new universe’ of deadly capabilities
- Hamas calls on Hezbollah to join in fight against Israel
- Senators to FIFA, others: Don’t reward Putin with the World Cup in 2018
- U.S. condemns Israeli shelling of shelter in Gaza
- Obamacare shoots premiums up by 88 percent in California
- Chicken pox outbreak puts illegal immigrant facility on lockdown
- Obama to Republicans: ‘Stop just hatin’ all the time’
States push new privacy blueprint for drones
Question of the Day
A coalition of state officials is drawing up a uniform blueprint for drone privacy laws in an effort to head off a patchwork of conflicting rules and regulations being adopted across the country.
The model legislation could, theoretically, be used by lawmakers everywhere to put in place a uniform system, as opposed to the state-by-state approach unfolding now.
“I believe we all view privacy as a serious issue that our constituents are concerned about, yet we also see the long-term benefits in the use of unmanned aircraft for carrying out missions that are otherwise dirty, dull or dangerous,” said Alaska Lt. Gov. Mead Treadwell, a Republican who is chairman of the Aerospace States Association, a nonprofit group of public officials, industry leaders and others that advocates for the aerospace and aviation sector.
The association is partnering with the Council of State Governments and the National Conference of State Legislatures “to develop suggested legislation for consideration by the states.”
The groups have reached out to a number of industry organizations, civil liberties and law enforcement groups and other entities for suggestions on how to pen the model legislation, the adoption of which would be entirely voluntary.
Comments are due by June 1.
The blueprints could bring clarification to what’s already a confusing situation, as many states are racing forward on the drone privacy issue.
Idaho and Florida already have laws restricting the use of drones by law enforcement agencies. Virginia has considered similar legislation, though Republican Gov. Bob McDonnell wants police to have access to drones and has amended a bill that would have prohibited it.
Dozens of other states are considering their own drone-related bills, which range from modest restrictions to near-total bans on any use of the craft, including by police or first responders.
Most of those proposals stem from public fear — sometimes bordering on paranoia — about drones, what they can do and how much surveillance average citizens will be under once the craft are fixtures in American skies.
The drone industry is trying to calm the national debate, keenly aware of the fact that many Americans harbor deep concerns about its products, centering around their ability to snoop and their widely reported use in assassinating terrorism suspects in the Middle East.
The sector’s leading trade group, the Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International, praised the efforts of the privacy coalition.
“The unmanned systems industry welcomes this conversation about how best to advance unmanned aircraft technology while safeguarding Americans’ privacy rights,” said association President Michael Toscano. Drones “hold tremendous potential to keep the public safe, create lasting jobs, boost local economies and further advance the U.S. as a leader in technology and innovation.”
It’s the latest step the association has taken to cast itself as a proponent not only of drone technology, but also of the Fourth Amendment and “responsible” personal privacy protections.
Last year, the group adopted a code of conduct, which called on all drone operators, whether they be private businesses, law enforcement agencies or average citizens, to respect the privacy rights of others when piloting their craft.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Ben Wolfgang covers the White House for The Washington Times.
Before joining the Times in March 2011, Ben spent four years as a political reporter at the Republican-Herald in Pottsville, Pa.
He can be reached at email@example.com.
- Obama to Republicans: 'Stop just hatin' all the time'
- White House: No choice but to act now on climate change
- EPA hears testimony on proposed carbon emissions rules
- Russia in violation of 1987 missile treaty, White House says
- In politics, all states are 'border' states
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
- Geraldo Rivera: Matt Drudge 'doing his best to stir up a civil war'
- Catholic League slams Obama: 'Do Christian lives mean so little to you?'
- Al Gore's climate-changers at EPA hearings foiled by cool temperatures
- Lois Lerner hated conservatives, new emails show
- HURT: Impeaching Obama is a losing strategy for the GOP
- MSNBC's Ronan Farrow questions lack of racial diversity in emoji characters
- CARSON: Rudderless U.S. foreign policy
- Obama thanks Muslims for 'building the very fabric of our nation'
- Obama vows veto of House border bill
- ISTOOK: Get ready for super-priced burgers due to NLRB decree
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world