- Chinese Death Star: The moon cited as the perfect launch pad for ballistic missiles
- Help wanted: Homeland Security plagued by vacancies at the top
- We are not amused: Queen’s protection officers warned to keep ‘sticky fingers’ off the royal cashews
- Unleash the crossbows: Gov. Scott Walker creates new hunting season
- Bubonic plague kills 20 in Madagascar
- G-20 diplomats fell for hacker attack promising nude photos of former French first lady Carla Bruni
- Minnesota guardsman charged with stealing private soldier data for fake IDs
- Florida appeals court rules universities can’t regulate guns
- Vladimir Putin defends Russian conservative values
- Tea Party Patriots call key GOP firing a declaration of war
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Lawmakers should try simplicity
Question of the Day
When our high school freshman recently began tackling Homer’s “The Odyssey,” something struck me about the Senate’s “Gang of Eight” amnesty legislation.
For centuries, scholars and students have studied the nuances of “The Odyssey.” Countless books have been written about the epic poem, and discussion and debate continue unabated to this day. Conversely, the current amnesty legislation is twice as long, with indisputably greater implications fraught with unintended consequences. And at 844 pages the legislation will be a document unread in its entirety by those who will try to force its imposition.
Where is the debate and discussion? Or should we simply rely on the paragons of intellectual firepower in Congress? I think not. To wit, in March 2010, Rep. Henry C. “Hank” Johnson Jr., Georgia Democrat, stated that Guam could tip over as a result of an increase in U.S. naval forces. Last month, Rep. Barbara Lee, California Democrat, introduced legislation claiming that global warming increases prostitution. And the most inane, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, California Democrat, said “Obamacare” had to be passed in order for us to see what was in it. I’m not implying that Democrats have a monopoly on simple-mindedness, but it seems to me that immigration reform requires far more of an Odyssean understanding than any proposal predicated upon Democrats’ inability to rise above the intellectual level of “The Cat in the Hat.”
On immigration, therefore, I’d propose a series of one-page pieces of legislation, the first of which would be on securing the border. Once border security is deemed successful, subsequent one-pagers would each address issues such as E-Verify enforcement, sanctuary-city elimination and so on. These would be simple steps to solve complex problems.
Even Dr. Seuss would be proud.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
By Matt Kibbe
The short-term deal will assure long-term overspending
Get Breaking Alerts
- Obama's Afghanistan experts stumped on U.S. death toll, war costs during hearing
- Comma on!: Twitter erupts over Obama-Castro 'marriage'
- NAPOLITANO: A conspiracy so vast
- N. Korean news agency: Kim Jong Un's uncle executed
- All-out war breaks out in GOP over budget pact
- White House improvises again on patchy Obamacare rollout
- Biden guarantees victory on immigration reform
- Jane Fonda Foundation fails to make single contribution in 5 years: report
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
- VEGAS RULES: Harry Reid pushed feds to change ruling for casino's big-money foreigners