- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
- Rep. Henry Cuellar on border crisis: ‘Playing defense on the one-yard line’
- Activists vow to occupy fast-food restaurants to get higher pay
- Rep. Luis Gutierrez: Senate Dems wary of immigration politics
- Summer camp for 1 percenters: Sushi, limos and shopping at FAO Schwarz
- Colorado gun crackdown law found to be built on faulty data
- Hank Aaron steps to fundraising plate for Democrat Michelle Nunn
- ISIL terrorists blow up burial site of Jonah, vow more of same
- Impeach Obama, say 35 percent in new poll
- Taliban yank 14 Shiites off bus, bind and shoot them on Afghan road
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: No more extremist wool over our eyes
Question of the Day
Tom Howell Jr.'s article, "Israeli airstrikes on Syria put Obama at the crossroads" (Web, May 5), quotes an Obama official as saying: "If he [Assad] drops sarin on his own people, what's that got to do with us?" I was shocked by this remark.
It definitely has a lot to do with us and our ally Israel, because if Bashar Assad uses chemical weapons on his own people, one can just imagine what he will do to Israel, America and other free nations. It is now known that the rebels are not just innocent Syrian people longing for democracy; they are. in fact a large mix of Hamas, al Qaeda and other assorted terrorists backed by Iran. These are not people you want to arm.
Keep in mind that whoever wins this civil war in Syria, the enemies are united in their threats against Israel, America and all other free, non-Muslim nations. Therefore, we have to be united to fight against a common, lethal enemy that can only fuel a civil war globally if left alone. These people have already reached our own soil several times. Do we have to wait until they get Syria's chemical weapons before we can prevent them from using these weapons against us? Israel is not waiting for that; neither should we.
Also, we cannot trust arming one side or the other. We did that in Afghanistan and Pakistan, and Israel did that with Yasser Arafat, who was supposed to be a moderate. Arafat's Fatah agreed to fight against the Hamas terrorists, but what happened? The Palestinians ended up turning their weapons on Israeli soldiers instead.
Just before his re-election last year, President Obama approved the decision to allow approximately 3,000 Palestinians the right to come to our country as refugees from Gaza. I hope Mr. Obama will indeed alter his plans since we Americans now know our goodwill gestures to promote democracy in Muslim nations are not what a majority of Muslims leaders or their people really want.
BARBARA ANN FENNELL BLOOM
Owings Mills, Md.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
Get Breaking Alerts
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- Presidents of Honduras, Guatemala blame U.S. for border children crisis
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- PRUDEN: The Democratic-wannabe mice under Hillary Clinton's feet
- Obama takes aim at 'corporate deserters'
- Crime-ridden U.S. cities differ on ways to fight gun violence