JERUSALEM (AP) — Over the decades, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has cultivated an image as a tough-talking leader in the global struggle against terrorism. That reputation could be put to the test this month in a landmark court case that could force him to choose between supporting victims of Palestinian violence and risking a diplomatic rift with China.
Mr. Netanyahu’s government must decide whether to allow a former Israeli security official to testify as a star witness who could tip the scales in the case, filed by families of victims of suicide bombers who accuse the Bank of China of facilitating terrorist funding via accounts in the United States.
Critics say that after initially encouraging the claims against the bank, Israel is now having second thoughts, fearing it could jeopardize valuable trade ties with China if it allows the former official, who is sworn to secrecy, to testify.
“Israel has to decide whether they are fighting terrorism and continuing the struggle which they initiated … or collapsing to the pressure of China and abandoning the terror victims,” said Nitsana Darshan-Leitner, an Israeli lawyer involved in the case.
Mrs. Darshan-Leitner is representing 22 families of people who were killed in Palestinian suicide bombings.
The families accuse the government-owned Bank of China, through its U.S. branches, of serving as a key conduit in transfers of money to Hamas and Islamic Jihad, Palestinian groups that have killed hundreds of Israelis.
The family of Daniel Wultz, a 16-year-old American who was killed in a 2006 suicide bombing in Tel Aviv carried out by Islamic Jihad, is pursuing a separate but related case against the bank.
The families are seeking hundreds of millions of dollars in damages in U.S. courts. With claims based in part on U.S. anti-terrorism laws, a verdict against the bank also potentially could affect its ability to do business in the United States.
While these cases are legally separate, they all depend heavily on the testimony of a former Israeli official named Uzi Shaya. The ex-counterterrorism agent has emerged as a key witness in determining how much the Bank of China knew about the financial transfers.
According to court documents, Mr. Shaya was part of a delegation of Israeli counterterrorism officials who met with Chinese officials in April 2005, warning them that Hamas and Islamic Jihad were transferring large sums of money to their militants through the Bank of China. At that meeting, the Israelis asked Chinese officials to “take action” to prevent further transfers.
Mr. Shaya is scheduled to appear for questioning in New York on Nov. 25, but the Israeli government has not said yet whether it will allow him to go.
U.S. District Judge Shira Scheindlin, who is hearing the case, said at a July hearing that Israel’s position could be a “make-or-break decision” for the case.
“This may be the only person who really has the knowledge as to what transpired at the meeting,” according to a transcript.
In an Aug. 29 letter to lawyers for the victims, Mr. Shaya said he wanted to testify but did not yet have permission to do so.
“In light of my moral and national obligation and my commitment to the war on terror, I am inclined to give a deposition,” he wrote. “However, thus far, the State of Israel has not yet formulated its final position on the matter.”
“The assumption is that he’s coming,” she said, but she acknowledged that nothing was certain.
Mr. Netanyahu’s office and the Israeli Justice Ministry declined comment on the case. Dani Arditi, director of the counterterrorism bureau at the time of the meetings with the Chinese, and Mr. Shaya also refused to comment.
Mr. Netanyahu has fashioned himself as an expert on fighting terrorism for his entire political career, and signs of official Israeli involvement in the case are everywhere.
The claims against the bank include detailed listings of account numbers, dates and precise sums of money that were transferred over several years — information that would almost certainly require professional intelligence work to obtain.
In addition, another former Israeli security official in the prime minister’s office, Shlomo Matalon, submitted a sworn statement in 2009 outlining some of the transfers and attesting that the Israelis had warned Chinese officials about the transactions. Despite such warnings, he said the bank continued to carry out transfers for Islamic Jihad and Hamas.
“The Israeli government asked us through our lawyers to bring this case and provided relevant evidence,” Wultz’s father, Yekutiel, who was wounded in the 2006 bombing, said in a statement.
“We believe it is critically important to stop the flow of money to terrorists to prevent attacks like the one that killed Daniel and are grateful for the support we have received from many people in Israel, the United States and around the world who all want to see commitments honored, justice done and a safer, more peaceful world,” said Mr. Wultz, who lives in Florida.
Adding to the high profile of the case, Daniel Wultz’s mother, Sheryl, is a cousin of U.S. House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, Virginian Republican. His office said he is “not involved” in the case.
Mrs. Darshan-Leitner, the lawyer representing the other families, said she plans to subpoena Stuart Levey, a former U.S. Treasury Department official, as a witness who could help the case, especially if Mr. Shaya doesn’t testify.
She said she believes Mr. Levey, who monitored the financial dealings of terrorist groups, has evidence showing Bank of China accounts were used by Hamas to channel funds to operatives in Gaza. Mr. Levey’s current employer, HSBC Holdings PLC, declined comment and would not make him available for an interview.
The Bank of China declined comment. But in Beijing, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei said China opposes “all forms of terrorism” and takes a “proactive role in global counterterrorism cooperation.” He said China also takes safeguards “to prevent any financial institutions from supporting terrorist activities.”
Israeli media reports have said Mr. Netanyahu began to have misgivings about the case last spring, shortly before leading a trade delegation to China. The Yediot Ahronot daily has said the Chinese threatened to cancel the visit if Mr. Netanyahu allowed Mr. Shaya to testify.
China has a history of using its considerable economic might to voice displeasure with other countries. For three years, Beijing has frozen relations with Norway since a committee appointed by the Norwegian Parliament awarded the 2010 Nobel Peace Prize to an imprisoned Chinese dissident. Diplomatic ties have been gutted, meetings canceled and economic ties hamstrung.
Israeli businessman Amos Yudan, one of the members of Mr. Netanyahu’s delegation, said he was not privy to any of the political discussions that took place during the trip, but he said China is a major target for Israeli businesses. China is especially interested in Israeli technology in agriculture and medical equipment.
“Generally speaking, Israel today is doing a lot of efforts to try to increase commercial activities,” Mr. Yudan said. “I think the visit of the prime minister was important because they laid out basic agreements.”
Last week, Mr. Netanyahu hosted Meng Jianzhu, a senior Chinese official, in Jerusalem. His office said the visit “was a sign of the rapidly improving relations” between Israel and China. “The prime minister added that there were very many areas in which the two countries could cooperate and noted that Israel would be very pleased to do so,” it said.