- Unbeliebable: White House turns Bieber petition response into immigration screed
- Obama signs law denying Iran ambassador’s visa, but says law is ‘advisory’
- Mich. judge to laughing convicted killer: ‘I hope you die in prison’
- Man charged in Kansas City-area highway shootings
- Keystone XL pipeline still on hold after State Dept. decision
- Fla. man charged with killing 16-month-old son to play Xbox undisturbed
- Drones from the deep: Pentagon develops ocean-floor attack robots
- Michigan mayor slaps back atheists’ try to erect ‘reason station’ at city hall
- PHILLIPS: Where is the conservative establishment?
- 7.5-magnitude earthquake shakes southern Mexico
Be all that you can be, but for less money: Army to cut recruiters’ pay
The Army will reduce or eliminate Special Duty Assignment Pay for many recruiters next year, according to an official memo obtained by The Washington Times.
Special Duty Assignment Pay provides extra income for soldiers who perform extremely difficult jobs, or have an unusually high degree of responsibility for a mission. It ranges from $75 to $450 a month.
“Our leadership is well aware of the impacts of this change on our Soldiers and Families. The Army did not make this decision lightly; this decision results primarily because of the emerging budgetary environment that all services are facing,” Maj. Gen. Allen Batschelet, commanding general of Army Recruiting Command, said in the memo.
The Defense Department has been forced to cut its budget by $500 billion over the next 10 years under an automatic spending reduction law.
One recruiter who requested anonymity for fear of reprisals said a reduction in Special Duty Assignment Pay will likely not be well received by recruiters, who tend to work longer hours and are under more pressure to succeed than many of their fellow soldiers.
“Most of us ‘career recruiters’ have factored our special pay into our lifestyles since many of us have had it for years,” the recruiter said. “We are now going to take a pay cut of possibly thousands of dollars a year … [I] certainly have not heard about Congress cutting any of their perks.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Kristina Wong is a national security reporter for The Washington Times, covering defense, foreign policy and intelligence affairs. She can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Despite Pentagon cuts and eye on Pacific, Air Force implored to save the 'Warthog'
- Pentagon welcomes budget deal but says more defense spending needed
- Rep. Hunter to Pentagon: Don't lower combat standards for women
- Scientists raise alarm over plan to destroy Syria's chemical weapons at sea
- Hagel renews Qatar defense pact despite differences over Iran, Syria
TWT Video Picks
Women losing coverage under Obamacare, too
- Scalia to students on high taxes: At a certain point, 'perhaps you should revolt'
- Former Ranger breaks silence on Pat Tillman death: I may have killed him
- Special Forces' suicide rates hit record levels casualties of 'hard combat'
- Feds approve powdered alcohol; 'Palcohol' available later this year
- EDITORIAL: Mark Warner running scared?
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- EDITORIAL: More Lerner smoking-gun emails at IRS
- U.S. Navy to turn seawater into jet fuel
- Harry Reid blasts Bundy ranch supporters as 'domestic terrorists'
- 'Deport Bieber' petition draws no comment from White House
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.