- Obama military strategy too weak for future security, panel reports
- Sen. Tom Coburn vows to slow down budget-busting bills ahead of recess
- Obama fantasizes about more executive power, signs new order on federal contractors
- Clintons call Klein, Halper, Kessler ‘a Hat Trick of despicable actors’: report
- Boehner accuses Obama of ‘legacy of lawlessness’
- Pro-marijuana group claims responsibility for Brooklyn Bridge flag swap
- Young adults shun Obamacare mostly due to cost: survey
- Stabbing attack on transgender girl, 15, was ‘bias motivated,’ police say
- LGBT adults still lean overwhelmingly toward Democratic Party
- Lawmakers rattled by Syria genocide horrors, call on Obama to act
Be all that you can be, but for less money: Army to cut recruiters’ pay
Question of the Day
The Army will reduce or eliminate Special Duty Assignment Pay for many recruiters next year, according to an official memo obtained by The Washington Times.
Special Duty Assignment Pay provides extra income for soldiers who perform extremely difficult jobs, or have an unusually high degree of responsibility for a mission. It ranges from $75 to $450 a month.
“Our leadership is well aware of the impacts of this change on our Soldiers and Families. The Army did not make this decision lightly; this decision results primarily because of the emerging budgetary environment that all services are facing,” Maj. Gen. Allen Batschelet, commanding general of Army Recruiting Command, said in the memo.
The Defense Department has been forced to cut its budget by $500 billion over the next 10 years under an automatic spending reduction law.
One recruiter who requested anonymity for fear of reprisals said a reduction in Special Duty Assignment Pay will likely not be well received by recruiters, who tend to work longer hours and are under more pressure to succeed than many of their fellow soldiers.
“Most of us ‘career recruiters’ have factored our special pay into our lifestyles since many of us have had it for years,” the recruiter said. “We are now going to take a pay cut of possibly thousands of dollars a year … [I] certainly have not heard about Congress cutting any of their perks.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Kristina Wong is a national security reporter for The Washington Times, covering defense, foreign policy and intelligence affairs. She can be reached at email@example.com.
- Despite Pentagon cuts and eye on Pacific, Air Force implored to save the 'Warthog'
- Rep. Hunter to Pentagon: Don't lower combat standards for women
- Pentagon welcomes budget deal but says more defense spending needed
- Hagel renews Qatar defense pact despite differences over Iran, Syria
- Scientists raise alarm over plan to destroy Syria's chemical weapons at sea
TWT Video Picks
By Ted Cruz
Israel saves its enemies; Hamas endangers its friends
- Inside the Ring: Israel surprised by Hamas tunnel network
- Army's 3-D printed bombs to create 'a whole new universe' of lethal capabilities
- Chicken pox outbreak puts illegal immigrant facility on lockdown
- GOP leaders delay border bill, leave Obama in control
- Report: 40% of weapons sent to Afghanistan are unaccounted for
- CIA admits improperly hacking Senate computers in search of Bush-era information
- CRUZ: A tale of two hospitals: One in Israel, one in Gaza
- Lois Lerner hated conservatives, new emails show
- Catholic League slams Obama: 'Do Christian lives mean so little to you?'
- U.S. troops told not to eat, drink in front of Muslims during Ramadan
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world