- Obama to Central American leaders: I need help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
- HAYDEN: Intelligence, evidence and the case against Russia
- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
Be all that you can be, but for less money: Army to cut recruiters’ pay
Question of the Day
The Army will reduce or eliminate Special Duty Assignment Pay for many recruiters next year, according to an official memo obtained by The Washington Times.
Special Duty Assignment Pay provides extra income for soldiers who perform extremely difficult jobs, or have an unusually high degree of responsibility for a mission. It ranges from $75 to $450 a month.
“Our leadership is well aware of the impacts of this change on our Soldiers and Families. The Army did not make this decision lightly; this decision results primarily because of the emerging budgetary environment that all services are facing,” Maj. Gen. Allen Batschelet, commanding general of Army Recruiting Command, said in the memo.
The Defense Department has been forced to cut its budget by $500 billion over the next 10 years under an automatic spending reduction law.
One recruiter who requested anonymity for fear of reprisals said a reduction in Special Duty Assignment Pay will likely not be well received by recruiters, who tend to work longer hours and are under more pressure to succeed than many of their fellow soldiers.
“Most of us ‘career recruiters’ have factored our special pay into our lifestyles since many of us have had it for years,” the recruiter said. “We are now going to take a pay cut of possibly thousands of dollars a year … [I] certainly have not heard about Congress cutting any of their perks.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Kristina Wong is a national security reporter for The Washington Times, covering defense, foreign policy and intelligence affairs. She can be reached at email@example.com.
- Despite Pentagon cuts and eye on Pacific, Air Force implored to save the 'Warthog'
- Pentagon welcomes budget deal but says more defense spending needed
- Rep. Hunter to Pentagon: Don't lower combat standards for women
- Scientists raise alarm over plan to destroy Syria's chemical weapons at sea
- Hagel renews Qatar defense pact despite differences over Iran, Syria
TWT Video Picks
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- Russia shipping sophisticated weapons systems to Ukraine separatists
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- White House readies for House GOP impeachment push: 'Foolish' to ignore
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- Ted Nugent loses second casino gig for 'racist remarks'
- Let it roll: D.C. Council hits Las Vegas on taxpayer's dime, leaves $14,000 tab
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq