- French president accuses Syria’s Assad of gassing his own citizens
- Jimmy Carter’s grandson makes gains in governor’s race in Georgia
- Yemen: Airstrike targets al Qaeda training camps
- Easter worshippers shocked as car rams church, injuring 21
- NYT’s David Brooks: Obama has ‘manhood problem’ in Middle East
- Ted Cruz thanks Obama for denying visas to terrorists
- Survivors recall chaos, fear in Everest avalanche
- General Mills apologizes for ‘right to sue’ confusion, reverses policy
- Dealer wanted in U.S. for art fraud nabbed in Spain
- Easter morning delivery for space station
EPA’s ‘listening sessions’ on new rules held in cities, skirt coal towns
San Francisco and Seattle are synonymous with the environmental movement, not coal mining — but that hasn’t stopped the Obama administration from holding “listening sessions” in those and other major metropolitan areas to hear questions, concerns and complaints about its new global-warming regulations.
The meetings, hosted at Environmental Protection Agency regional offices across the nation, including one at its D.C. office Thursday, are part of the administration’s public outreach campaign as it implements harsh new limits on carbon emissions from power plants.
Those regulations — which already have been released for future plants and are under development for existing facilities — are expected to have devastating impacts on coal plants, which simply can’t meet the standards with currently available, financially feasible technology.
The rules are expected to have a spillover effect on the mining industry, as demand for the fuel would decrease as U.S. power-generation facilities are forced to close.
While the EPA paints itself as open to all points of view, critics say the agency is intentionally avoiding towns that rely heavily on coal mining, or those that rely on coal-fired power plants to support their local economy.
“As the listening session tour concludes, it is increasingly clear EPA never wanted to listen in the first place,” said Laura Sheehan, senior vice president of communications at the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity. “These listening sessions are just one more example of an administration that continues to exclude from its rule-making process the millions of Americans who stand to lose the most.”
Events also have been held in New York City, Chicago, Denver and other major cities.
The EPA has pushed back against charges it wants to avoid critics and minimize the complaints from coal proponents and the power-generation sector. Agency officials say they’ve actively reached out to and maintained a working relationship with the fossil-fuels sector while writing new climate-change regulations.
“We’ve been working with everyone,” said Janet McCabe, the EPA’s acting assistant administrator for the Office of Air and Radiation, at the beginning of Thursday’s session in Washington. “We’re doing this because we want to be open to any and all information about what is important to each state and stakeholder. That’s what this process is all about.”
The current round of sessions specifically are focused on upcoming EPA rules that would govern existing power plants. Those regulations will have a disproportionate effect on coal, which provides about 40 percent of U.S. electricity and remains a key part of economies across Appalachia, the Midwest and elsewhere.
Two months ago, the agency released new guidelines for future power plants, a central component of President Obama’s ambitious second-term global-warming agenda.
The regulations limit coal facilities to no more than 1,100 pounds of CO2 per megawatt hour, a figure that analysts say simply can’t be met in a remotely cost-effective way with today’s technology.
Members of Congress from West Virginia and elsewhere have invited the EPA to towns in their home states, with the goal of putting faces to the lost jobs the agency likely will cause if it moves forward with current proposals.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Ben Wolfgang covers the White House for The Washington Times.
Before joining the Times in March 2011, Ben spent four years as a political reporter at the Republican-Herald in Pottsville, Pa.
He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- What will a grandchild mean for Hillary?
- What will a grandchild mean for Hillary Clinton?
- Obama to tour site of Washington mudslide
- Obamas head to church on Easter morning
- Joe Biden's biggest gaffe: VP blowing his 2016 head start
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Women losing coverage under Obamacare, too
- Former Ranger breaks silence on Pat Tillman death: I may have killed him
- In Colorado, a marijuana holiday tries to go mainstream
- Scalia to students on high taxes: At a certain point, 'perhaps you should revolt'
- Special Forces' suicide rates hit record levels casualties of 'hard combat'
- USAID documents cite Hillary Clinton in chaos of Afghan aid
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- Feds approve powdered alcohol; 'Palcohol' available later this year
- CURL: Shelly O first lady Michelle Obama comes in last
- UNICEF launches 'Mr. Poo' mascot in India to curb public defecation
- See the scathing documents detailing $600 billion squandered in Afghanistan
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.