- ISIL creates all-female brigade to terrorize women into following Sharia law
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama to Latin leaders: Help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
Inside the Beltway: A GOP charm offensive toward the American public?
Question of the Day
— CNN’s “Crossfire” analyst S.E. Cupp, during a vigorous discussion about congressional Republican behavior with her fellow analyst Van Jones.
Nobody has managed to rewrite, sanitize or politicize the original lyrics to “The Star-Spangled Banner” in the name of political correctness. Well, not yet, anyway. This is not the case with our good neighbors to the north, however, where a group of high-powered ladies seeks to rewrite “O, Canada,” the national anthem, in more “gender neutral terms.”
Former Prime Minister Kim Campbell, author Margaret Atwood and a host of former and current lawmakers and educators are troubled by the majestic lines, “O Canada! Our home and native land! True patriot love in all thy sons command.” Uh-oh. “Sons.” There’s the problem: the women want the final words to read “in all of us command,” claiming it’s closer to the original lyrics of yore.
“Women are still facing gender equality issues every day. Our National Anthem should reflect what women of the past fought for and like them, we should not settle for the status quo, but rather continue paving the way toward an inclusive Canada,” the ladies reason, in an online rationale of their quest.
They should remember, however, that “gender equality” has come to mean a great more these days, what with transgender folk and others a presence on the gender identity radar. Ms. Campbell and company better make room for an extra lyric.
NEW WILL AT FOX NEWS
As in George Will. The brilliantly reasonable columnist and veteran analyst has departed his perch at ABC News to join forces with the Fox News Channel to offer his observations on the network’s daytime and prime-time programming.
“His wisdom is enduring and his achievements are far too long to list,” says Michael Clemente, executive vice president of news at Fox.
Mr. Will, 72, previously served as a panelist for ABC’s “This Week with George Stephanopoulos,” and was the Washington editor of National Review, among many other things.
USE IT OR LOSE IT
There’s collateral damage amid the stalled budget battle and the bombastic close of the fiscal year. A new University of Chicago study examining federal procurement data reveals hard economic evidence that the proverbial “use-it-or-lose-it” spending sprees in federal agencies are very real — with expenditures nearly five times higher as the fiscal year ebbs away.
“Faced with uncertainty over future spending demands, there’s an incentive to build up a rainy-day fund over the first part of the year, followed by a rush to spend it on lower-quality projects at the end of the year,” says assistant economics professor and study co-author Neale Mahoney.
“Our model confirmed three things,” Mr. Mahoney notes. “First, an organization with a fixed period in which it must spend its budget resources — like the federal government — sees a surge of spending at the end of the year. Secondly, such spending is of lower quality, and third, permitting the rollover of spending into subsequent periods leads to higher quality.”
POLL DU JOUR
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- The border crisis could prove a 'big boost' for Republicans as the midterms approach
- Inside the Beltway: Just a little media protection for the White House
- Some federal help for old American battlefields: $1.3 million to spruce them up
- Inside the Beltway: Frugal-phobic Congress offers 828 spending bills
- It's grim: 911 Commission warns terrorism has entered 'a new and dangerous phase'
Latest Blog Entries
- A startling 20 percent of Democratic lawmakers already endorse Hillary Clinton for president
- Hey food police: calling obesity a 'disease' is actually a health risk
- Cheese and an 'enhanced experience': White House goes showbiz on the State of the Union address
- Cruz calls it a 'circus': the State of the Union spectacle begins
- Half of American fans say God and 'supernatural' forces are in play during sports events
TWT Video Picks
President wants everyone but himself to pay more
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- Ted Nugent loses second casino gig for 'racist remarks'
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Afghan who killed three U.S. Marines in 2012 to serve over 7-year prison sentence
- EDITORIAL: Obama's 'economic patriotism' means higher taxes
- HUSAIN: Fleeing Iraqi Christians find safe haven at the Shrine of Imam Ali
- Brian Kelly, Notre Dame ready for different route to title
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq