- Virginia police: 2 dead after storm at campground
- Ukrainian prime minister announces resignation
- House members question $17 billion VA request
- N.Y. Gov. Cuomo launches statewide task force to collect LGBT data
- Obama’s motorcade prevents woman in labor from crossing street to hospital
- Grijalva: Anti-trafficking law ‘line in the sand for many of us’
- Joe Biden: ‘Businesses are hiring at historic rates’
- Jeb Bush to Congress: Don’t use border crisis as excuse to delay immigration reform
- U.N. Human Rights head accuses Israel of war crimes
- CBP Commissioner: Border is ‘more secure and more safe’
California bucks trend on abortion restrictions
Question of the Day
At a time when other states are moving to restrict abortion services, California Democrats have pushed through two new laws that will permit nonphysicians such as midwives to perform abortion procedures in the first 12 weeks and will loosen building standards for abortion clinics.
The laws, signed by Gov. Jerry Brown, a Democrat, late last week, have sparked sharp reactions on both sides of the divide over abortion policy.
Proponents say the laws are needed to boost access to abortion to women in areas of the state with few or no clinics, but opponents counter that the laws are likely to boost the number of abortions in California, which already has the fifth-highest abortion rate among states.
What is not in dispute is that California has bucked the national trend of enacting laws restricting abortion: One of its new laws actually repeals building standards that were set for abortion clinics.
“Early abortion access is a critical public health issue,” said Democratic state Assemblywoman Toni Atkins, lead sponsor of AB 154, which will permit trained midwives, nurse practitioners and physician assistants to perform first-trimester “aspiration” abortions. Aspiration abortions refer to procedures in which the fetus is suctioned out of the womb.
With more qualified providers available to do early abortions, women in underserved areas should be able to get early abortions without traveling “excessively long distances,” Ms. Atkins said.
Moreover, if more women can get early, less-expensive abortions more readily, there should be fewer costly, second-trimester abortions, a legislative analysis said.
Physicians and surgeons will still be required to perform abortions after the first 12 weeks of a pregnancy.
Dozens of groups, representing midwives, nurse practitioners, physician assistants and reproductive-justice advocates, strongly backed the law.
A six-year study from the University of California San Francisco “showed that specially trained health professionals can provide high-quality early abortion care,” said Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California Action Funds.
Planned Parenthood also cheered enactment of AB 980, which repeals outdated and “out-of-sync” facility requirements for clinics that perform abortions. Now all “primary care clinics” will be “held to the same standards,” it said.
These measures “support the health and well-being of women in California,” Mr. Brown said Oct. 9, when he signed these and five other bills related to women’s health.
Pro-life groups, however, said that California was bucking a national trend at the state level, where some 43 other states have been setting what they say are “common-sense” restrictions on abortions every year.
“Reducing the medical standards for abortion, both in the personnel and the sanitary conditions required, defies logic for those who say they care about women,” said Anissa Smith, spokeswoman for the California Pro-Life Council.
Efforts will be made to limit the midwife law as its regulations are being written, and there is talk of legal action to stop it before it goes into effect Jan. 1, Brian Johnston, executive director of California Pro-Life Council, recently told Craig Roberts on KFAX-AM radio in San Francisco.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Cheryl Wetzstein covers family and social issues as a national reporter for The Washington Times. She has been a reporter for three decades, working in New York City and Washington, D.C. Since joining The Washington Times in 1985, she has been a features writer, environmental and consumer affairs reporter, and assistant business editor.
Beginning in 1994, Mrs. Wetzstein worked exclusively ...
- U.S. social and economic trends on worrisome track, survey finds
- David Tyree hired by Giants in a move bashed by gay-rights groups
- JAMA opinion piece calls for ending lifetime ban on blood donation by gay men
- HIV rate drops in U.S. for most groups; percentage for young gay, bisexual men up
- VH1's 'Naked Dating' outrages parents group
Latest Blog Entries
- Gay therapy ban author seeks Calif. House seat
- Transgender 'bathroom law' gets 5,000 more signatures
- Pro-life, stem-cell bill signed into law by Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback
- N. Dakota lawmakers approve tough abortion bill
- Pope Benedict XVI's successor should allow priests to get a new title: Husband, poll finds
TWT Video Picks
The subsidies are a hit with patients who don't exist
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- Obama's empty tough-talk: Gun prosecutions plummet on his watch
- Algerian plane diverted due to storms, second aircraft: 116 missing
- Obama dispatches researchers to border to check on National Guard
- Whistleblowers flood VA with lawsuits despite apology
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Conservative groups decry Democrats' 'war on women' tactic
- Obama says public not familiar enough with issues
- Astronaut shares 'saddest photo' from space: Bombs bursting over Israel, Gaza
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq