Caution voiced on Iran’s nuclear program proposal; Israel still wary

Question of the Day

Should Congress make English the official language of the U.S.?

View results

“We are going into these discussions with our eyes open,” Ms. Psaki said. “We have put in place the most crippling sanctions — some of the most crippling sanctions in history here, which is why Iran is at the point it’s at.”

“We wouldn’t take any action unless we felt it was warranted and it was proportional,” she said. “But we also have a responsibility to seek diplomatic options when the door opens, and that’s the point we’re at now.”

With Iran signaling a desire to retain some uranium-enrichment capabilities and Israel demanding a halt of enrichment activity, it remains to be seen how the administration will proceed.

Still, many Middle East scholars in Washington were guardedly optimistic about the prospects for a breakthrough.

“I think that a deal can be attained that provides sufficient constraints on the Iranian program and sufficient transparency for the international community and would probably reach Israel’s bottom-line requirements as well,” said Suzanne Maloney, a scholar at the Brookings Institution who studies Iran, the political economy of the Persian Gulf and Middle East energy policy.

“Whether or not we reach that,” she added, “is very uncertain.”

This article is based in part on wire service reports.

© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

About the Author
Guy Taylor

Guy Taylor

Guy Taylor is the National Security Team Leader at The Washington Times, overseeing the paper’s State Department, Pentagon and intelligence community coverage. He’s also a frequent guest on The McLaughlin Group and C-SPAN.

His series on political, economic and security developments in Mexico won a 2012 Virginia Press Association award.

Prior to rejoining The Times in 2011, his work was ...

Latest Stories

Latest Blog Entries

blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks