- Egypt rights center raided, 2 Mubaraks acquitted
- New Mexico Supreme Court rules same-sex marriage constitutional
- Blame Bush: 5 years later, that’s still the mantra, pollsters find
- Dutch prostitutes demand same retirement benefits as soccer stars
- John McCain to Harry Reid: I’ll ‘kick the crap’ out of you
- Dogs that talk: Researchers seek $10K for ‘No More Woof’ technology
- 1,000 firefighters called to battle stubborn Big Sur wildfire
- Black Friday brouhaha: Millions of Target shoppers hit by credit card theft
- Britain orders airplane to rescue citizens from violent South Sudan
- Mega Millions winner emerges as Georgia mom, in ‘disbelief’
Backers of tax on Web sales renewing push
Question of the Day
Now that the government shutdown is over, House Republicans may turn their attention back to passing a bill that would let states charge online shoppers sales tax when they buy from websites such as Amazon and eBay.
The Senate passed the Marketplace Fairness Act back in May, but the Internet sales-tax bill has been buried in the House Judiciary Committee ever since, as Congress focused on the government shutdown and the debt ceiling.
With Republicans and Democrats agreeing this week to a short-term deal that will fund the government and raise the debt ceiling into early next year, proponents of the Marketplace Fairness Act hope House Republicans will take another look at the bill.
“I think we’re in good shape,” said David French, senior vice president of government relations at the National Retail Federation, which supports the bill. “We’re past the shutdown. The Hill’s back to work. We’re seeing some progress on this bill.”
Traditional retailers have been big supporters of the Marketplace Fairness Act, because they say online merchants that don’t have to collect sales tax enjoy an unfair advantage, because their prices seem lower.
A number of states also back the Marketplace Fairness Act, because they are losing tax dollars to online shoppers who fail to pay such taxes. But this bill would allow them to require online merchants to collect the tax at the point of the sale, making it more likely the states will see the money.
“Right now, the best thing we’ve got going is that we have a chairman who has taken the issue seriously and wants to move it forward,” said David Quam, deputy director for policy at the National Governors Association. “We’ll definitely be talking about this issue now that the shutdown is over. We were pushing it hard before, and now we will take that mantle back up.”
The Marketplace Fairness Act has received an unusually large amount of bipartisan support in the Senate and House, but many Republicans remain wary of supporting a bill that could be seen as a new tax, which is causing Mr. Goodlatte to take a long, hard look at the bill before making any recommendations.
“We’re definitely taking a closer look at this bill than the Senate did,” said a House Judiciary aide.
Last month, Mr. Goodlatte released a list of “seven principles” that he hopes the bill will address as his committee considers sending their own version to the House floor, and eventually back to the Senate.
One of the biggest points he made was that any Internet sales tax needs to be simple for the online merchants that will be collecting the money.
Proponents of the Internet sales tax point to software they say will allow online retailers to easily collect and remit taxes to state and local governments across the country, but opponents say the process will be arduous and time-consuming, adding to the compliance costs these online retailers face.
Mr. Goodlatte also wrote that any Internet sales-tax bill should seek to level the playing field for traditional and online retailers. Right now, traditional retailers complain they are at a disadvantage by having to collect sales taxes that their online peers don’t.
However, online stores say this bill could force them to collect sales taxes for about 9,600 different state and local governments around the country, which would be far more unfair, because a brick-and-mortar store need only charge the tax rates of the few taxing jurisdictions — state, county or city — in which it is based.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Tim Devaney is a national reporter who covers business and international trade for The Washington Times. Previously, he worked for the Detroit News, Grand Rapids Press, Portland Press Herald and Bangor Daily News. Tim can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Dysfunction, disarray at Homeland Security management cited in IG's report
- GM's Barra to be first woman to run top American carmaker
- Treasury sells last shares in 'Government Motors'
- U.S. businesses reach out quickly to partners in Iran
- General Motors ending Chevrolet sales in Europe to focus on Opel and Vauxhall
Latest Blog Entries
By Michael P. Orsi
Edward Snowden should declare his patriotism in court
- Citing 'unfair system,' Obama commutes sentences for 8 crack offenders
- Homeland Security helps smuggle illegal immigrant children into the U.S.
- Gov't wasted $30 billion on 'pillownauts,' crystal goblets -- buying human urine!
- Bill Gates: The Secret Santa disguised as a 'friendly fellow' on Reddit
- Obamacare 'pajamas boy' gets roundly mocked
- Armed response, not restrictive gun laws, brought swift end to school shooting
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- U.S. Army mulls wiping out memory of Robert E. Lee, 'Stonewall' Jackson
- Sebelius adds another Obamacare exemption
- BOLTON: Nero in the White House
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Southern Fried Politics from the Lens of a Persian-American Millennial
All of the world’s problems, solved on your back porch
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow