- NYT’s David Brooks: Obama has ‘manhood problem’ in Middle East
- Ted Cruz thanks Obama for denying visas to terrorists
- Survivors recall chaos, fear in Everest avalanche
- General Mills apologizes for ‘right to sue’ confusion, reverses policy
- Dealer wanted in U.S. for art fraud nabbed in Spain
- Easter morning delivery for space station
- Boxer Rubin ‘Hurricane’ Carter dies at 76
- Probe could complicate Rick Perry’s prospects
- Ukraine, Russia trade blame for eastern shootout
- Obamas head to church on Easter morning
MILLER: Obama’s victory lap - Republicans routed in shutdown, Obamacare fight
Once again, President Obama routed congressional Republicans. He used zero political capital and got everything he wanted — Obamacare is untouched, deficit spending continues endlessly, the government is reopened and the the debt ceiling is raised.
But the White House victory is a disaster for America.
As the government technically reopened Thursday morning, the president showed that none of this fight was about principle for him. He called the shutdown both a “manufactured” and “self-inflicted” crisis. Actually, it was a genuine and organic crisis from citizens who did not want Obamacare implemented on Oct. 1.
This whole episode started with Sen. Ted Cruz demanding that Obamacare be defunded, delayed or somehow modified before Congress continues to fund the government. The Texas Republican found enormous grassroots support for his effort, and the conservative House GOP caucus quickly joined the effort.
As the shutdown went on, however, Mr. Obama and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid demanded that spending for a continuing resolution negate the sequester and the budget law. They knew this would never fly, but they threw up this red herring to provide themselves with something to pretend to surrender in negotiations.
Republicans fell for it. This spending demand helped the White House take the focus off the original debate — the full implementation of Obamacare, despite the public’s anger about the biggest new entitlement program in 50 years.
Several real alterations to Obamacare were suggested and rejected — ending the medical device tax and forcing White House and congressional staff to go into the exchanges without a subsidy. The president wouldn’t give an inch.
In the end, the small concession to get moderate Republican votes was to require the secretary of Health and Human Services to certify that people getting government handouts for their health care qualified by income.
The GOP also gave up their upper hand over the debt limit.
Even though there were no payments due on Oct. 17, Mr. Obama told the world that the United States would “default” if he couldn’t borrow more money by that date. Republicans could have used this leverage to get something real — like postponing the individual mandate in Obamacare for a year or entitlement reform.
Instead, they got scared by the artificial deadline and ceded all negotiating to the consummate dealmakers — Mr. Reid and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell.
Part of the final deal was that the bicameral leaders of the budget committees would meet in a formal conference to come up with a joint budget for the coming year. While Rep. Paul Ryan, chairman of the House committee, should be praised for trying to get some order to the spending mess, it is very unlikely this group will find a deal that both chambers can pass.
Just look at Mr. Obama’s first demand Thursday morning after signing the Senate deal. He called for Congress to come up with a “balanced approach to a responsible budget” — that’s his standard code for higher taxes and more spending.
The continuing resolution goes until mid-January, a date picked because the GOP wanted the funding to include next year’s sequestration cuts, at least temporarily. But the issue at hand was never spending.
Two week ago, the White House and both parties in Congress agreed not to break the Budget Control Act of 2011 that set spending at levels lower than Mr. Obama wanted at that time. (They called it a “spending cut,” but all it did was slow the increase.) That, in itself, was a small victory for conservatives.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Emily Miller is senior editor of opinion for The Washington Times. She is the author of “Emily Gets Her Gun … But Obama Wants to Take Yours” (Regnery 2013). Miller won the 2012 Clark Mollenhoff Award for Investigative Reporting from the Institute on Political Journalism.
- MILLER: Mark Witaschek tax investigation follows D.C. conviction for muzzleloader bullet ammunition
- MILLER: Harry Reid's hypocrisy on 'Equal Pay Day': No women on top leadership staff
- MILLER: Maryland bathroom bill for transgenders is part of LGBT lobby for sex-change rights
- MILLER: Mark Witaschek surrenders to D.C. police 'Gun Offenders Registry'
- MILLER: Michelle Obama has media blackout in China while touting freedom of press
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Women losing coverage under Obamacare, too
Get Breaking Alerts
- Former Ranger breaks silence on Pat Tillman death: I may have killed him
- Scalia to students on high taxes: At a certain point, 'perhaps you should revolt'
- Special Forces' suicide rates hit record levels casualties of 'hard combat'
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- Feds approve powdered alcohol; 'Palcohol' available later this year
- U.S. Navy to turn seawater into jet fuel
- WILLIAMS: Bill Maher, comedian or bigot?
- NYT's David Brooks: Obama has 'manhood problem' in Middle East
- USAID documents cite Hillary Clinton in chaos of Afghan aid
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters