- Mich. judge to laughing convicted killer: ‘I hope you die in prison’
- Man charged in Kansas City-area highway shootings
- Keystone XL pipeline still on hold after State Dept. decision
- Fla. man charged with killing 16-month-old son to play Xbox undisturbed
- Drones from the deep: Pentagon develops ocean-floor attack robots
- Michigan mayor slaps back atheists’ try to erect ‘reason station’ at city hall
- PHILLIPS: Where is the conservative establishment?
- 7.5-magnitude earthquake shakes southern Mexico
- ISTOOK: IRS “wants to throw us in jail,” says tea party leader
- Easter woes: Chocolate costs soar, becoming ‘unaffordable’ luxury
What’s in a name? Dumping ‘Redskins’ could have a major financial impact
Racial sensitivities and tradition aside, there are economic costs and benefits if the Washington Redskins decide to drop their storied name, putting the franchise in a tough spot with major financial ramifications at stake.
Any name change puts hundreds of millions of dollars at risk for the team and its owner, Dan Snyder. Branding experts point to sponsorships, merchandise and ticket sales as potential pitfalls. Doing nothing, however, could prove equally costly if popular resistance to the current name continues to grow.
Ronald Goodstein, associate professor of marketing at Georgetown University, values the Redskins franchise at just under $2 billion, when factoring in the brand equity it has created with fans over the years, making it one of the most valuable sports franchises in the world. It could take decades for Mr. Snyder to recreate that sentiment among fans with a new team name.
“The Washington Redskins are actually worth a lot more than what they own,” Mr. Goodstein said. “How much would a name change cost me, if I’m Dan Snyder? The answer is hundreds of millions of dollars.”
According to Forbes, the Washington Redskins are the eighth-most valuable sports franchise in the world, and the fifth-most valuable in the United States. This means Mr. Snyder has a lot to lose if fans don’t go along with a new name for the team.
Mr. Goodstein said sponsors and fans would run away in droves, but other brand experts disagree.
Matt Levine, a sports branding consultant, said a name change could actually open new avenues of businesses for the Washington Redskins, because companies that do not usually sponsor football teams would want to be associated with a franchise that would become bigger than football.
“There’s an enormous market that goes beyond people who are even Redskins fans in the United States and around the world who will get excited about a new team name and a new team logo,” Mr. Levine said.
Anthony Fernandez, another sports branding consultant, agreed.
“You’re going to capture a new market anytime you rebrand yourself,” Mr. Fernandez said. “There will be companies that will naturally latch on, because they see an opportunity here.”
Neither analyst could put a dollar figure on any potential new business, but they both say it would increase from the current level.
Mr. Fernandez said whatever the Redskins lose in old business, they will more than make up for in new business.
“The benefits are only going to outweigh the negatives,” he said. “I think their existing business partners will want to be part of this. But it will also pave the way for new business. If old business goes away, there’s new business to pick up the slack.”
But Mr. Goodstein is not so optimistic.
“Some people would say, ‘But look at all the new sales they would have,’” he explained. “It is not clear to me that at that point people would get on board with that.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Tim Devaney is a national reporter who covers business and international trade for The Washington Times. Previously, he worked for the Detroit News, Grand Rapids Press, Portland Press Herald and Bangor Daily News. Tim can be reached at email@example.com.
- Dysfunction, disarray at Homeland Security management cited in IG's report
- GM's Barra to be first woman to run top American carmaker
- Treasury sells last shares in 'Government Motors'
- U.S. businesses reach out quickly to partners in Iran
- General Motors ending Chevrolet sales in Europe to focus on Opel and Vauxhall
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
- Harry Reid blasts Bundy ranch supporters as 'domestic terrorists'
- Immigration still on hold: Boehner's office
- Inside China: Marine's comment on islands draws sharp Chinese response
- Supreme Court weighs appeal to concealed-carry gun laws
- PRUDEN: When a bored president just 'mails it in'
- Nancy Pelosi washes immigrants' feet in humble Holy Week act then promotes on Twitter
- Atheists rush to stage Easter display: 'Jesus Christ is a myth'
- BRUCE: Obama deliberately emboldening America's enemies
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- Critics rail against liberal bias for commencement speakers
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.