- Obama military strategy too weak for future security, panel reports
- Sen. Tom Coburn vows to slow down budget-busting bills ahead of recess
- Obama fantasizes about more executive power, signs new order on federal contractors
- Clintons call Klein, Halper, Kessler ‘a Hat Trick of despicable actors’: report
- Boehner accuses Obama of ‘legacy of lawlessness’
- Pro-marijuana group claims responsibility for Brooklyn Bridge flag swap
- Young adults shun Obamacare mostly due to cost: survey
- Stabbing attack on transgender girl, 15, was ‘bias motivated,’ police say
- LGBT adults still lean overwhelmingly toward Democratic Party
- Lawmakers rattled by Syria genocide horrors, call on Obama to act
New Jersey court agrees to allow same-sex marriages Monday
Question of the Day
New Jersey can begin issuing marriage licenses to gay couples on Monday, the state high court ruled Friday, as the justices prepare to hear a case on the constitutionality of the state’s law banning same-sex unions.
The New Jersey Supreme Court will still examine the issue of gay marriage in court proceedings in a future hearing, but Friday declined to delay the start of gay marriages, which were ordered to begin Oct. 21 by a lower court judge.
A leading traditional marriage group immediately criticized the decision, accusing the court of short-circuiting the democratic process in the state.
“It is extremely disappointing that the New Jersey Supreme Court has allowed the ruling of an activist judge to stand pending its appeal through the court system,” said Brian Brown, president of the National Organization for Marriage.
But gay rights groups were ecstatic at the news.
“Pop the champagne — love and fairness are winning over discrimination and injustice,” said Kevin Cathcart of Lambda Legal, one of the groups that has been pushing for gay marriage in the courts.
New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie’s administration had asked the state court to maintain the status quo on marriage while the lawsuit, Garden State Equality v. Dow, proceeded.
However, the New Jersey Supreme Court on Friday unanimously upheld a ruling by Mercer County Superior Court Judge Mary Jacobson that said gay couples were injured by being limited to state-licensed civil unions, not marriages.
Federal benefits are now typically given only to gay couples who are legally married by a state.
“The state has advanced a number of arguments, but none of them overcome this reality: Same-sex couples who cannot marry are not treated equally under the law today,” the high court ruled Friday. “The harm to them is real, not abstract or speculative.”
Oral arguments in the gay-marriage case are expected Jan. 6 or 7.
In the meantime, the state government will have to allow weddings and work quickly through some logistical issues: Are gay and lesbian couples that have wed legally elsewhere are now automatically considered married in New Jersey? Does the Monday deadline apply to when marriage licenses must be issued, or when ceremonies can take place? What should officials do about the three-day waiting period between getting a license and marrying?
A state lawmaker asked the state attorney general’s office Thursday whether the 72-hour waiting period would apply for same-sex couples seeking to get married Monday. Several New Jersey towns also started accepting marriage-license applications from same-sex couples, in case the court agreed that the weddings could proceed.
Despite the uncertainty, gay couples in the state — some of whom have been together for decades — have been planning to have ceremonies as soon as they would be recognized by the state government.
Lambertville Mayor David DelVecchio said he’s planning to lead the state’s first legally recognized same-sex wedding. Mr. DelVecchio also performed the ceremony in 2007 when the same couple became among New Jersey’s first to be granted a civil union.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Cheryl Wetzstein covers family and social issues as a national reporter for The Washington Times. She has been a reporter for three decades, working in New York City and Washington, D.C. Since joining The Washington Times in 1985, she has been a features writer, environmental and consumer affairs reporter, and assistant business editor.
Beginning in 1994, Mrs. Wetzstein worked exclusively ...
- Massachusetts lawmakers OK new abortion clinic buffer law
- Mississippi abortion law can't be enforced
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia's gay marriage ban
- Events honoring 20th National Parents' Day reaffirm family
- '50 Shades' movie trailer outrages anti-porn groups
Latest Blog Entries
- Gay therapy ban author seeks Calif. House seat
- Transgender 'bathroom law' gets 5,000 more signatures
- Pro-life, stem-cell bill signed into law by Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback
- N. Dakota lawmakers approve tough abortion bill
- Pope Benedict XVI's successor should allow priests to get a new title: Husband, poll finds
TWT Video Picks
Both parties recognize the Democrats' scam
- Inside the Ring: Israel surprised by Hamas tunnel network
- Army's 3-D printed bombs to create 'a whole new universe' of lethal capabilities
- Chicken pox outbreak puts illegal immigrant facility on lockdown
- CRUZ: A tale of two hospitals: One in Israel, one in Gaza
- GOP leaders delay border bill, leave Obama in control
- Israel surprised by Hamas tunnel network
- Report: 40% of weapons sent to Afghanistan are unaccounted for
- CIA admits improperly hacking Senate computers in search of Bush-era information
- Colorado poll shows women tuning out Democrats' 'war on women' strategy
- 3 African leaders cancel trip to U.S. over Ebola outbreak; Obama still plans summit
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world