- Unbeliebable: White House turns Bieber petition response into immigration screed
- Obama signs law denying Iran ambassador’s visa, but says law is ‘advisory’
- Mich. judge to laughing convicted killer: ‘I hope you die in prison’
- Man charged in Kansas City-area highway shootings
- Keystone XL pipeline still on hold after State Dept. decision
- Fla. man charged with killing 16-month-old son to play Xbox undisturbed
- Drones from the deep: Pentagon develops ocean-floor attack robots
- Michigan mayor slaps back atheists’ try to erect ‘reason station’ at city hall
- PHILLIPS: Where is the conservative establishment?
- 7.5-magnitude earthquake shakes southern Mexico
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: White Rose, plot to kill Hitler not comparable
A friend of mine had a similar experience to that of writer Jeffrey Scott Shapiro, albeit 30 years ago (“No Dachau? No Auschwitz? Ignoring just as evil as denying,” Commentary, Oct. 18). When my friend visited Dachau, he encountered a German population that professed to know nothing (or pretended to know nothing) about what had occurred there. There was universal denial and no acceptance of blame for those who had been killed.
Having said this, I was surprised that Mr. Shapiro equated the resistance shown by the White Rose with the attempted assassination in 1944 of Hitler by a group of army officers. The motives of the White Rose movement were pure and simple; namely, to protest against a tyrannical regime that was intolerant and bent on killing all opposition and “inferior” races, primarily Jews. On the other hand, Lt. Col. Claus von Stauffenberg and his fellow officers had no such lofty motive, having witnessed by that point the killing of most of the 6 million Jews, many of them at the hands of the regular German military.
Instead, the leaders of the 1944 plot to kill Hitler were motivated more by an effort to save Germany from the bombing and trauma of utter defeat. The White Rose participants were true heroes and paid dearly for their views. The military that tried to overthrow Hitler in 1944 did not do it for altruistic purposes, but rather to lessen the ultimate consequences of the defeat of Nazi Germany by Allied forces.
TWT Video Picks
Women losing coverage under Obamacare, too
Get Breaking Alerts
- Scalia to students on high taxes: At a certain point, 'perhaps you should revolt'
- Former Ranger breaks silence on Pat Tillman death: I may have killed him
- Special Forces' suicide rates hit record levels casualties of 'hard combat'
- Feds approve powdered alcohol; 'Palcohol' available later this year
- EDITORIAL: Mark Warner running scared?
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- Critics rail against liberal bias for commencement speakers
- Harry Reid blasts Bundy ranch supporters as 'domestic terrorists'
- EDITORIAL: More Lerner smoking-gun emails at IRS
- EDITORIAL: Republicans finally fight back in phony 'war on women'