- New Mexico Supreme Court rules same-sex marriage constitutional
- Blame Bush: 5 years later, that’s still the mantra, pollsters find
- Dutch prostitutes demand same retirement benefits as soccer stars
- John McCain to Harry Reid: I’ll ‘kick the crap’ out of you
- Dogs that talk: Researchers seek $10K for ‘No More Woof’ technology
- 1,000 firefighters called to battle stubborn Big Sur wildfire
- Black Friday brouhaha: Millions of Target shoppers hit by credit card theft
- Britain orders airplane to rescue citizens from violent South Sudan
- Mega Millions winner emerges as Georgia mom, in ‘disbelief’
- ‘Duck Dynasty’ Phil Robertson suspended ‘indefinitely’ for gay quip
EDITORIAL: A grand bargain
But Republicans must beware of the sucker deal
Question of the Day
John A. Boehner began talking up a “grand bargain” Wednesday, a bargain with congressional Democrats and the White House to enable the government to reopen for business, guarantee a rancor-free agreement to increase the debt limit and set the stage for entitlement and tax reform. Good luck with that.
The president and his allies still think they can pressure Republicans to surrender by making the government shutdown as painful as possible, and once they have chased them into the tall grass, they can extract a “clean” debt-ceiling agreement to set the stage for higher taxes and more spending. Barack Obama and Harry Reid would no doubt consider that grand.
The Wednesday evening invitation to the White House, to bring Republicans and Democrats “to reason together,” in LBJ’s favorite phrase, turned out to be just another occasion for Mr. Obama to listen to his favorite orator, lecturing everybody else. He let the Republicans know that he won’t negotiate on anything. He did give the photographers a nice photo-op.
He would negotiate only after Republican leaders give him the “clean” continuing resolution and agree to raise the debt ceiling without conditions. This was his nuclear option, writ large. Do it his way, or he will blow the Republicans away, to hosannas from all.
The Republicans in the House adopted legislation in May that, in the event of failure to raise the debt ceiling in the fall, the United States could meet its obligations with current revenue. Many states have similar rules requiring the state to pay its bills before it takes on more debt.
The Senate didn’t agree, and the White House rejected the House insurance policy. The Republicans tried to attach it to a continuing resolution last week, but Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid stripped it out and denounced it as the “pay China First Act.” But he warned of the dire consequences that would follow if the nation is forced by Republicans to default on debts to creditors like China. The Democrats think the Republicans will lose both battles, and give them control of both House and Senate, leaving them free to demonize the successful, expand the government and raise taxes at will.
Mr. Boehner deserves credit for both courage and stamina in his search for a reasonable path to a resolution of the impasse. But he’s a politician of the old school, who believes that leaders of both parties have an incentive to sit down, negotiate and solve problems. His opponents, alas, are playing a different game.
The tide may shift during the next week. Wednesday night’s meeting at the White House suggests that the president, who earlier boasted that he wouldn’t negotiate, blinked because he knows he can’t appear to be saying that it’s his way or the highway. He knows that the winds are fickle.
When they shift, Republicans must be prepared to be reasonable — and appear to be reasonable — and get what they can in a continuing resolution, and, most important, be ready to defend their position on taxes, spending and governmental reform as the debate over the debt ceiling approaches.
If they do that, they will have turned the tables on Mr. Obama. If the 2014 congressional races are fought over Obamacare, whether Americans want to pay higher taxes or enable a bloated government to grow fatter, sloppier and more slovenly still, the result is likely to be grand indeed.
About the Author
- EDITORIAL: A man for 2016
- EDITORIAL: Spies unlike us
- EDITORIAL: Amnesty by another name
- EDITORIAL: Navigating the swindle
- EDITORIAL: Payback time in Wisconsin
Latest Blog Entries
By Andrew P. Napolitano
Fourth Amendment says Obama is not at liberty to collect metadata
Get Breaking Alerts
- Border Patrol helps smuggle illegal immigrant children into the U.S.
- Gov't wasted $30 billion on 'pillownauts,' crystal goblets -- buying human urine!
- Duck Dynasty Phil Robertson suspended indefinitely for gay quip
- Obamacare 'pajamas boy' gets roundly mocked
- Bill Gates: The Secret Santa disguised as a 'friendly fellow' on Reddit
- Half of America strips religion from Christmas
- U.S. Army mulls wiping out memory of Robert E. Lee, 'Stonewall' Jackson
- BOLTON: Nero in the White House
- In court filing, NCAA denies legal duty to protect athletes
- La. Gov. Jindal defends suspended Duck Dynasty star