Supreme Court skeptical of campaign finance cap

Case could let individuals give to more candidates, parties

Question of the Day

What has been the biggest debacle on Obama's watch?

View results

He said the justices are being asked to balance the “First Amendment negative” of a limit on one person’s giving with the “First Amendment positive” that comes from average people believing their small-dollar contributions have an effect on elections.

But he said that division gets mixed up because wealthy individuals can still spend unlimited amounts of money independently.

“Now, that’s, I think, the question that’s being asked. And I think that that is a very serious question, and I’d like to know what flows from it,” he said. “Is it true? So what? What are we supposed to do?”

© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks