- Texas man arrested for powder-letter hoax
- Islamic State opens ‘marriage bureau’ for single jihadists
- Drone almost blocks California firefighting planes
- Tornado rips off roofs, downs trees near Boston
- GOP: Environmental rules keeping agents from accessing border
- John Kerry: Millions displaced by religious fighting in 2013
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia’s gay marriage ban
- White House says Russia ‘losing’ war in Ukraine
- Hamas turns to North Korea for weapons deal, Iran for money
- Syrian casualties surge as jihadis consolidate
Calif. bill allows midwives, others to abort fetuses
Lower standard of health care feared
Question of the Day
Midwives and other health professionals will be permitted to perform first-trimester abortions under a bill passed by the California legislature.
Pro-choice groups applauded the bill, saying too many California women do not have easy access to an abortion provider. Opponents said the bill will heighten health risks for women by allowing non-physicians to perform abortions.
It will “lower the standard of care for women,” California Assemblywoman Kristin Olsen, Republican, said Friday.
Assemblywoman Toni Atkins, the bill’s sponsor, said questions about the bill had been answered in four legislative hearings, and it clearly would not diminish the standard of care.
The measure, A.B. 154, passed handily, 49-25. It now goes to Gov. Jerry Brown, a Democrat and a pro-choice supporter, for his expected signature.
Early support for the Atkins bill came from a study published in January in the American Journal of Public Health (AJPH).
Some 5,800 physician-performed first-trimester abortions were compared with around 5,700 abortions performed by recently trained nurse midwives, nurse practitioners and physician assistants.
The rate of complications was higher in the non-doctors’ group — 1.8 percent compared to 0.9 percent with the doctors. But most complications were “minor,” and the non-doctors’ outcomes were deemed “statistically no worse than those performed by the more experienced physician group.”
Most abortions are performed in early pregnancy — before 12 weeks gestation — and vacuum or “aspiration” abortions are the most common kind of first-trimester procedures. It involves preparation and dilation of the cervix, and insertion of a straw-shaped cannula that is attached to a suction pump. When the cannula is placed against the fetus, it will suction the fetus out of the uterus, along with other uterine contents.
The process is considered safe for women, although it has risks for infection, bleeding, perforation of reproductive organs and the possibility that a second procedure would be needed if contents were left behind.
Supporters of A.B. 154 said having more health care professionals trained to perform first-trimester abortions will benefit women and save the state Medicaid funds, since second-trimester abortions cost more.
“Black, uninsured, and low-income women have less access” to first-trimester abortions, and “increasing the types of health care professionals involved in abortion care is one way to reduce this health disparity,” the AJPH article said.
NARAL Pro-Choice of California urged passage of the bill, along with ACCESS Women’s Health Justice, American Civil Liberties Union of California, Black Women for Wellness, California Latinas for Reproductive Justice, Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California, and California Women’s Health Alliance.
Pro-life groups said the industry is already underregulated, which is why most states are trying to set new rules for abortion clinics and require abortion doctors to have hospital-admitting privileges.
“The pro-abortion lobby will stop at nothing to force an abortion-first mentality on women and families — committing violence against weak and defenseless preborn children, and ignoring commonsense protections for women in some of their most vulnerable moments,” said Lila Rose, president of Live Action.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Cheryl Wetzstein covers family and social issues as a national reporter for The Washington Times. She has been a reporter for three decades, working in New York City and Washington, D.C. Since joining The Washington Times in 1985, she has been a features writer, environmental and consumer affairs reporter, and assistant business editor.
Beginning in 1994, Mrs. Wetzstein worked exclusively ...
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia's gay marriage ban
- Events honoring 20th National Parents' Day reaffirm family
- '50 Shades' movie trailer outrages anti-porn groups
- Tougher clinic rules lead to drop in Texas abortions
- U.S. social and economic trends on worrisome track, survey finds
Latest Blog Entries
- Gay therapy ban author seeks Calif. House seat
- Transgender 'bathroom law' gets 5,000 more signatures
- Pro-life, stem-cell bill signed into law by Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback
- N. Dakota lawmakers approve tough abortion bill
- Pope Benedict XVI's successor should allow priests to get a new title: Husband, poll finds
TWT Video Picks
By David Keene
Allowing states to innovate could reduce dependency on bureaucracy
- D.C. seeks to stay judge's order allowing gun owners to carry in public
- Hillary Clinton: Forget Obama, George W. Bush made her 'proud to be an American'
- Illegal immigrants demand representation in White House meetings
- Iraqi Christians rally at White House: 'Obama, Obama, where are you?'
- Border surge puts Obama legacy on immigration at stake
- Tennessee Gov. Haslam slams White House for secret dump of illegals in his state
- Romney would win popular vote in rematch against Obama: CNN poll
- Babson College, BYU win top spots in Money magazine's college rankings
- White House says Russia 'losing' war in Ukraine
- D.C. plans to seek stay of order striking down ban on handguns in public
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq