For three years, the National Security Agency routinely violated rules set down by federal judges governing how the agency was allowed to use mass-collected data about every telephone call made in the United States, according to more than 1,800 pages of declassified documents the Obama administration released Tuesday.
"From a technical standpoint, there was no single person who fully understood exactly how the program functioned," said a senior intelligence official, one of two who agreed to discuss the documents with reporters only on condition of anonymity, despite speaking on a telephone conference call organized by his agency's public affairs office.
"As a result, we did not describe it accurately" in court submissions beginning in May 2006 and the failure to comply with the court's rules did not become apparent until January 2009, he said.
"This was a real compliance issue that NSA uncovered" through its internal vigilance, another official said.
"NSA and [the Department of Justice] reported [it] to the courts and then fixed it" with the judges' help, he added.
But the admission drew withering criticism from privacy and civil liberties advocates.
"How can Congress, the American people, or even the president try to oversee an agency when the agency itself doesn't even know the details of its programs?" asked Mark M. Jaycox, a policy analyst with the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
He called the NSA "a rogue agency."
The documents released Tuesday relate to interpretations of section 215 of the Patriot Act argued by the government and approved by the FISA court, the secret tribunal created by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. Section 215, the so-called "business records" provision, allows the government to issue secret orders, compelling companies to turn over their records and forbidding them from revealing the seizure.
Top secret documents leaked in June by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden showed that the agency had used a secret, and very broad, interpretation of Section 215 to force U.S. telephone companies to hand over data about every phone call made in the United States.
The agency had thereby amassed a vast archival database of the caller, destination, time and duration — the so-called "metadata" — of every phone call made in America over the past five years.
Officials said in June that the database contained no information about the content of calls and that it was only used to look for people in America who had been in direct or indirect contact with suspected terrorists abroad. The FISA court ruled that the agency had to prove a "reasonable articulable suspicion" that a phone number was a legitimate target for counter-terrorism intelligence gathering before it could check the number against the database and see which Americans had been in touch with terrorists.
But beginning in 2006, NSA officials also checked the daily batches of data coming in from the phone companies against a so-called "alert list" — a batch of phone numbers that the agency regarded "of counter-terrorism interest" but many of which had not been cleared by the court. The list included the phone numbers of thousands of Americans.
During the three years the alert list was used, it grew from fewer than 4,000 to nearly 18,000, according to the officials on the conference call. Only about 2,000 of those had court approval.
"There are all kinds of things that [U.S. intelligence agencies do] that don't meet any particular evidentiary standard," one official said.
No intelligence reports had been produced based on the illegal checks, the officials said. They described the alert list as "an analytic tool" and "a way that NSA tried to prioritize its work," rather than an intelligence-gathering tool.
"We were focused on the archive, as was the court," said the official, referring to the massive five-year database.
That was one reason the violations took so long to come to light, the official said.
Tuesday's disclosures are likely to add to pressure on the administration over the Section 215 program and other broad domestic data-gathering by the NSA. The House narrowly failed to delete funding for the program earlier this summer in a vote that came shockingly close for many in U.S. intelligence world.
One of the authors of the Patriot Act — hurriedly passed by Congress after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United States — said last week that Section 215 was never intended to be used in this fashion.
Wisconsin Republican F. James Sensenbrenner Jr., who was chairman of the House Judiciary Committee at the time the act passed, joined a legal challenge by the Electronic Frontier Foundation to the constitutionality of the NSA's use of Section 215.
The lawsuit has also been joined by many other groups, including recently the National Rifle Association and a Jewish social-justice organization called the Shalom Center.
For two years, the foundation has been embroiled in another case about the 215 program in a lawsuit under the U.S. Freedom of Information Act.
The administration "may attempt to portray [the release of the documents] as being done out of the goodness of its heart and as a testament to its commitment to transparency," argued the Electronic Frontier Foundation's Trevor Timm on its blog. But, he said the Justice Department released this information because a court ordered the disclosure in response to the foundation's lawsuit.
Mr. Timm said that the department fought "tooth and nail to keep every page of its interpretations secret, even once arguing it should not even be compelled to release the number of pages that their opinions consisted of."
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.