- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
- HAYDEN: Intelligence, evidence and the case against Russia
- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
- Rep. Henry Cuellar on border crisis: ‘Playing defense on the one-yard line’
- Activists vow to occupy fast-food restaurants to get higher pay
HARRIS: Redskins can absorb opening loss, but Packers game looms large
Question of the Day
Many of the Redskins’ faithful likely woke up Tuesday morning, perhaps with a slight headache, and rushed to their favorite news outlet to see if maybe it was all some awful dream.
Nope. It is there in the record books. The Eagles, led by coaching genius of the moment Chip Kelly, came into FedEx Field and raced by the Redskins 33-27 on Monday night. Philadelphia gained 322 yards. In the first half. The Eagles’ offense made the Redskins’ defense look lost, and Skins wunderkind RG3 looked like he hadn’t played all preseason.
What is perhaps more disturbing for the Skins after a restless night’s sleep is not the 0-1 record that hangs by their name. Heck, half the NFL is 0-1 right now and a good portion of the 12 teams that will eventually make the playoffs are in that half.
What has to be a bit scary now is the Redskins face the very real prospect of opening the season 0-2. Their next game is Sunday at Green Bay, which is also 0-1 after losing to San Francisco. Green Bay, with quarterback Aaron Rodgers. Angry Green Bay. A very good Green Bay team that has no interest is going to 0-2, just as the Redskins don’t. In Green Bay.
One of the great things about the NFL is the angst that every week brings. It’s not a 162-game season like baseball or even 82 like the NBA and NHL. It’s 16 games and the sun rises and sets with each one.
You figure six games is the most you can lose and still be relatively safe for a playoff spot (though it isn’t guaranteed, as the 11-5 Patriots found out in 2008). You can also get in with more losses, as the 9-7 Giants did two years ago when they won the Super Bowl. Still, 10-6 is a fairly safe number.
The Redskins got to six losses after nine games last season and didn’t lose again in the regular season en route to the NFC East title. Not an envelope you really want to push more than once.
And starting 0-2 is not a death sentence. The 2007 Giants — there they are again — started 0-2 and won the Super Bowl over the Patriots.
But your odds of a prosperous season do decrease, significantly, if a second loss comes before a first victory.
The New York Times did a thorough look at this subject about a year ago, after six teams got off to 0-2 starts. The Saints, who lost their opener to the Redskins, were the only 0-2 NFC team and probably the only surprise on the list. The AFC teams at 0-2 were Jacksonville, Tennessee, Cleveland, Oakland and Kansas City.
None of those six teams made the playoffs. Since 1990, a total of 190 teams have had 0-2 starts. Of those, 22 went on and qualified for the playoffs. That’s only 11.5 percent over almost a quarter century.
Now, a lot of those 190 teams got to 0-2 for a pretty good reason. They weren’t very good. They pretty much had a zero percent chance of getting to the playoffs anyway.
That’s not the case with the Redskins. Despite what was on display for much of Monday night, the team remains a capable one and still should be considered a playoff contender. Going 7-0 to finish a season as the Skins did last year is a rarity, but it happened for a reason. It wasn’t luck.
But an NFL season is enough of an obstacle course, even for the most capable teams. The past three Super Bowl champions had six, seven and six regular-season losses.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Washington Times sports editor Mike Harris has more than 30 years experience in the business as a reporter, columnist and manager. He’s covered a wide variety of events including two Olympics, horse racing, auto racing, professional and college sports. E-mail him at email@example.com and follow the section on Twitter @WashTimesSports.
- HARRIS: Break but don't bend? Bryce Harper quandary rears its head again for Nats
- HARRIS: Offseason nothing to look forward to for Caps or Wizards
- HARRIS: D.C. not yet spellbound by Wizards, but they're no illusion
- HARRIS: Echoes of 1978 NBA champs in these Wizards
- HARRIS: Wizards have moved to head of D.C.'s class
Latest Blog Entries
- Gio Gonzalez living a dream by throwing bullpen sessions to ex-Yankee Jorge Posada
- Meet Connor Carrick, the youngster who played his way onto the Caps' final roster
- Go Aggies: Nationals notes and lineups for Sept. 14
- RG3: There is no conflict with Redskins coach Mike Shanahan
- Sunday Nats-Dodgers lineups and some thoughts from reliever Craig Stammen
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Russia shipping sophisticated weapons systems to Ukraine separatists
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is 'torture'
- Brian Kelly, Notre Dame ready for different route to title
- White House readies for House GOP impeachment push: 'Foolish' to ignore
- Presidents of Honduras, Guatemala blame U.S. for border children crisis
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq